Conceptual lessons on financial strategy following the US sub‐prime crisis

Emerald - 2008
Check‐TeckFoo1
1System and Engineering Management, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Solbridge International, WooSong University, Daejeon, Korea, School of Management, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK and Zicklin Business School, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeOn September 18, 2007, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee took a major step by cutting the federal funds rate by one‐half a percent (50 basis points). The only time this had happened in the USA was immediately after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Then the sub‐prime derivatives market threatened to engulf the US economy under a dark cloud of uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is an attempt to draw lessons relevant to international financial strategy from the US sub‐prime crisis.Design/methodology/approachThis paper presents reflections upon the sub‐prime derivatives market that had begun to evolve since 1993. Reviewing the situation from then until as late as of October 18, 2007, five key lessons are conceptualized. Where possible, insights on the major lessons to be drawn are rendered through simple diagrams.FindingsFive major lessons may be drawn from the sub‐prime turmoil. For easy citation, these are presented as idioms: “Do not put all bad eggs in one basket,” “Excessive demand outbalances risk and return,” “Robustness of actions for resolving a crisis,” “Banks to stay respectable as banks,” “Outcome of innovation, greed, and politics.” In conclusion, all these lessons are integrated through an overview.Practical implicationsThese lessons are explained in a manner so as to render them useful for both practitioners in the financial industry globally and a broader audience of interested readers. In particular, a thinking approach to learning is emphasized. Financial innovators are reminded of the wisdom of the ancients (eggs in a basket), and the applications of artificially intelligent forecasts of financial futures; specifically, US$ exchange rates are brought into the discussion.Originality/valueThis is an original piece of thinking on what lessons may be drawn from a major highly turbulent event: the sub‐prime crisis. It is an event that is a direct consequence of innovation in the financial markets.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bookstaber, R. (2007), A Demon of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge Funds, and the Perils of Financial Innovation, Wiley, New York, NY.

Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (2002), Contemporary Chinese Dictionary, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.

Foo, C.T. and Foo, C.T. (2003), “Forecast‐ability, chaos and foresight”, Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, Vol. 5, pp. 22‐3.

Greenspan, A. (2007), The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World, Allen Lane, London.

Hayre, L. (Ed.) (2001), Salomon Smith Barney Guide to Mortgage‐Backed and Asset‐backed Securities, Wiley, New York, NY.

Hiscock, G. (2007), “Learn to adapt”, (interview of Foo Check‐Teck), Australian Times, November 19.

Lintner, J. (1965), “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, pp. 13‐37.

Maggin, J., Tuttle, D., Pinto, J. and McLeavey, D. (2007), Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process, 3rd ed., CFA Institute, Charlottesville, VA.

Morecroft, J. (2007), Strategic Modeling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach, Wiley, New York, NY.

Partridge, D. (1998), Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering: Understanding the Promise of the Future, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, Chicago, IL.

Sharpe, W. (1964), “Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, pp. 425‐42.