Conceptual Issues in the Study of Dynamic Hazard Warnings
Tóm tắt
This paper presents a conceptual analysis of dynamic hazard warning systems. The normative aspects of responses to warnings are analyzed, and a distinction is made between two forms of responses to a warning system, referred to as compliance and reliance. Determinants of the responses to warnings are identified, and they are broadly classified into normative, task, and operator factors. Existing research on warnings and automation is assessed in view of this conceptual framework, and directions for future research are discussed. Some implications of this analysis for practitioners, designers, and researchers are indicated. Actual or potential applications of this research include recommendations for the analysis, design, and study of dynamic warning systems.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Breznitz, S., 1983, Cry-wolf: The psychology of false alarms.
Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph., 2003, The polygraph and lie detection.
Edworthy, J., 1998, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2, 3
Green, D. M., 1966, Signal detection theory and psychophysics.
Jürgensohn, T., Park, I., Sheridan, T. B. & Meyer, J. (2001). Conflict warnings and the search and detection of collisions in a simulated ATC-like task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 458–462). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Meyer, J., Bitan, Y., Shinar, D. & Zmora, E. (1999). Scheduling of actions and reliance on warnings in a simulated control task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 251–255). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Pritchett, A. R., 2001, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 5
Wiener, E. L. (1981). Complacency: Is the term useful for air safety? In Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar (pp. 116–125). Denver, CO: Flight Safety Foundation.