Computer use in cognitive psychology

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 26 - Trang 81-93 - 1994
Doris Aaronson1
1Psychology Department 8th Floor, New York University, New York

Tóm tắt

Some influences of computers on theory and methodology in cognitive research are discussed. Theoretical constructs that cognitive science has borrowed from computer science include processing algorithms, processing rates, information organization, and information selection. The application of these constructs to human information processing is considered, with illustrations from memory and reading research. Further, the role of computers in research methodology is evaluated, on the basis of a comparison of 1962 and 1992 journal articles. Attributes considered include the nature of stimulus control, item content and physical features, cognitive task demands, information feedback to subjects, and assessment of individual differences in cognitive strategies. These methodological attributes are illustrated by memory and reading paradigms for which computer technology is critical. Computer science has enriched theory and data in cognitive science, but the comparison of journal articles from 1962 and 1992 suggests that many psychologists are not taking full advantage of these possibilities.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aaronson, D., &Ferres, S. (1986). Reading strategies for children and adults.Psychological Review,93, 89–112. Aaronson, D., &Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 56–70. Aaronson, D., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative models.Journal of Verbal beaming & Verbal Behavior,16, 277–303. Ammon, P. R. (1968). The perception of grammatical relations in sentences: A methodological exploration.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 869–875. Becg, I. (1971). Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 176–181. Carroll, J., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (Eds.) (1971).American Heritage word frequency book. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Glanzer, M., &Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 381–398. Glanzes, M., &Razel, M. (1974). The size of the unit in short-term storage.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 114–131. Kling, J. W., &Rigcs, L. A. (1972).Woodworth & Schlosberg’s experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Learning, Motivation & Memory (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Lincoln, C. E., &Lane, D. M. (1980). Reaction time measurement errors resulting from the use of CRT displays.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 55–57. Mapou, R. B. (1982). Tachistoscopic timing on the TRS-80.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 534–538. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two.Psychological Review,63, 81–97. Miller, G. A. (1962). Decision units in the perception of speech.IRE Transactions,8, 81–83. Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P. S., &Laird, J. E. (1991). Symbolic architectures for cognition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 93–132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1991). Computing in cognitive science. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 49–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reed, A. V. (1979). Microcomputer display liming: Problems and solutions.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,11, 572–576. Snodgrass, J. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1980). Comparing parallel and serial models: Theory and implementation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 330–354. Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., &Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 275–290. Thorndike, E. L. (1931).Human learning. New York: Century. Vera, A. H, &Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation.Cognitive Science,17, 7–48. Wilkes, A. L., &Kennedy, R. A. (1969). Relationship between pausing and retrieval latency in sentences of varying grammatical form.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 241–245. Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H. (1954).Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.