Computed Tomography Imaging of the Acute Pelvis in Females

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal - Tập 64 - Trang 108-118 - 2013
Douglas S. Katz1, Maria Khalid1, Esther E. Coronel1, Joseph P. Mazzie1
1Department of Radiology, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

Sonography is the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of pelvic pain in female patients, especially if gynaecological pathology is suspected. However, computed tomography (CT) is frequently used in patients who present to emergency departments (and elsewhere) with otherwise nonspecific abdominal and pelvic pain and may be the first imaging modality to demonstrate an acute gynaecological abnormality. Computed tomography can also be used prospectively in selected patients to further evaluate findings initially identified on sonography, although to reduce radiation exposure, magnetic resonance imaging is being used more frequently in this situation. The purpose of this article is to discuss the spectrum of gynaecological findings of the acute female pelvis that may be identified on CT by the emergency radiologist and by the general radiologist, with a brief review of the imaging literature of each specific diagnosis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181958173 10.1007/s10140-011-0962-7 10.1007/s10140-008-0754-x 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31815202df 10.1148/rg.286085504 10.2214/AJR.10.7293 10.1148/rg.285075130 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.02.001 10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1289 10.1053/j.sult.2008.06.006 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.04.024 10.2214/AJR.06.0073 10.2214/ajr.152.1.123 10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.018 Lee J.H., 2009, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 16, 115 10.1007/s10140-009-0808-8 10.1148/radiology.171.3.2717741 10.1148/rg.284075069 10.1097/00004728-199911000-00016 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740261 Nitinauakam B., 2006, J Med Assoc Thai, 89, 513 10.1148/rg.271065042 10.1007/s002619900502 10.1016/j.rcl.2005.07.005 10.1097/00004728-200405000-00006 Shin D.S., 2010, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 296, 325 10.2214/AJR.06.0874 10.1097/00004728-199307000-00020 10.1007/s13244-012-0157-0 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.1.59 10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl18785 10.1007/s00261-003-0152-5 10.1097/00004728-198304000-00010 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00021 10.1148/rg.286085506 10.1097/00013644-200409000-00005 10.1007/s00261-006-9039-6 10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541123 10.1007/s10140-006-0570-0 10.1007/s10140-008-0732-3 10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00044-7 Crossman S.H., 2006, Am Fam Physician, 73, 859 10.1007/s00261-002-0052-0 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1738998 10.1148/rg.226025062 Hiller N., 2005, J Reprod Med, 50, 203 Jung S.I., 2011, J Obstet Gynaecol, 37, 228, 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01380.x 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.005 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.1.40 10.1007/s10140-007-0635-8 10.1007/s00261-008-9472-9 10.1148/radiology.170.2.2911683 10.2214/ajr.161.4.8372760 10.1148/rg.246045016 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181b5451e 10.1148/radiographics.13.4.8356266 10.2214/AJR.08.1015 10.2214/ajr.155.2.2115254 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888736 10.2214/ajr.171.2.9694481 10.1148/radiology.167.3.3283835 10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308461 Catry F., 2003, Abdom Imaging, 29, 120 10.1007/s00261-007-9206-4 10.1056/NEJMicm075079 10.1148/radiographics.10.6.2259770 10.1097/00004728-199409000-00027 10.1148/rg.25si055518 10.2214/ajr.159.3.1503024 10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.12.002 10.1097/00130747-200308000-00003