Comprehension of quantifier sentences in poor readers with different levels of arithmetic proficiency
Tóm tắt
This study compared the sentence hyperbole comprehension performance of Chinese poor readers with various levels of arithmetic proficiency. A total of 168 Chinese poor readers in Grade 1 were recruited, and their nonverbal intelligence, verbal working memory, Chinese receptive vocabulary, Chinese grammatical knowledge, character reading and morphological awareness were controlled. The reaction times of these students in correctly answering literal and inferential questions was selected for further comparison. Results of a mixed-effect model analysis show that the participants with good and poor arithmetic proficiency levels demonstrated similar levels of literal information comprehension, regardless of the presentation form of the quantifier construction that was built by the quantifier location of the sentences, the number of numeric characters in a single quantifier and the hyperbole function applied in the sentence quantifier. Students with good arithmetic proficiency also demonstrated faster response in comprehending quantifier inferential information. Primary school students with good arithmetic proficiency outperformed those with poor proficiency in the inferential reading of verbal numeric information. In addition, differences in arithmetic proficiency did not significantly affect the students’ word/character semantic representation cognition and shallow literal information processing. Overall, the results distinguish the interaction and independent numerical information processes at the literal and inferential levels of text quantifier comprehension for young primary school students with poor reading proficiency.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adelson, J. L., Dickinson, E. R., & Cunningham, B. C. (2015). Differences in the reading–mathematics relationship: A multi-grade, multi-year statewide examination. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 118–123
Akhondi, M., Malayeri, F. A., & Samad, A. A. (2011). How to teach expository text structure to facilitate reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 368–372
Armeni, K., Willems, R. M., Van den Bosch, A., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2019). Frequency-specific brain dynamics related to prediction during language comprehension. Neuroimage, 198, 283–295
Arsalidou, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2011). Is 2 + 2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. Neuroimage, 54(3), 2382–2393
Åsberg, J. (2010). Patterns of language and discourse comprehension skills in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(6), 534–539
Åsberg, J., & Sandberg, A. D. (2010). Discourse comprehension intervention for high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders: preliminary findings from a school‐based study. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10(2), 91–98
Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Jezzard, P., Padmanabhan, S., Clark, V. P., Karni, A., & Neville, H. (1997). Sentence reading: A functional MRI study at 4 Tesla. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 664–686
Beymer, D., Orton, P. Z., & Russell, D. M. (2007, September). An eye tracking study of how pictures influence online reading. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 456–460). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Bianco, M., Bressoux, P., Doyen, A. L., Lambert, E., Lima, L., Pellenq, C., & Zorman, M. (2010). Early training in oral comprehension and phonological skills: Results of a three-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(3), 211–246
Bott, O., & Radó, J. (2009). How to provide exactly one interpretation for every sentence, or what eye movements reveal about quantifier scope. The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics, 1, 25–46
Brasoveanu, A. (2011). Sentence-internal different as quantifier-internal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(2), 93–168
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5), 489–503
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing, 12(1), 31–40
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683–696
Chow, B. W. Y., Hui, A. N. N., Li, Z., & Dong, Y. (2021). Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820981399.
Cohn, N. (2020). Your brain on comics: A cognitive model of visual narrative comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 352–386
Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 405–438
Davenport, H. (1999). The higher arithmetic: An introduction to the theory of numbers. Cambridge University Press
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42
Desai, S., McLean, J., Lawrence, C., & Filik, R. (2021). The impact of hyperbole on perception of victim testimony. Journal of Pragmatics, 174, 143–156
Author (2020). Enhancing Poor Readers’ Reading Comprehension Ability through Word Semantic Knowledge Training.Reading & Writing Quarterly,1–17
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 55–80
Dong, Y., Chow, B. W. Y., Wu, S. X. Y., Zhou, J. D., & Zhao, Y. M. (2021). Enhancing poor readers’ reading comprehension ability through word semantic knowledge training. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(4), 348-364.
Glenberg, A., Willford, J., Gibson, B., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2012). Improving reading to improve math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(4), 316–340
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 163–189
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182
Grimm, K. J. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 410–426
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193–225
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160
Kim, Y. S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120
Kim, Y. S. G. (2020). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–684
Kim, Y. S. G., Guo, Q., Liu, Y., Peng, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Multiple pathways by which compounding morphological awareness is related to reading comprehension: Evidence from Chinese second graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(2), 193–212
Kim, Y. S. G., & Petscher, Y. (2020). Influences of individual, text, and assessment factors on text/discourse comprehension in oral language (listening comprehension).Annals of Dyslexia,1–20
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182
Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text processing: Inferences. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 193–202
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 21–31
Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition, 48(3), 243–279
Li, S. (2018). An Intervention Study on Vocabulary Comprehension Impairment in Children with Autism Using Semantic and Contextual Pairing Design. (Master Dissertation of Nanjing Normal University)
Liberman, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. Advances in Psychology (94 vol., pp. 167–178). North-Holland
Liu, Y., Lin, D., & Zhang, X. (2016). Morphological awareness longitudinally predicts counting ability in Chinese kindergarteners. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 215–221
Lyster, S. A. H., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Lervåg, A. O. (2021). Preschool phonological, morphological and semantic skills explain it all: Following reading development through a 9-year period. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 175–188
McGlone, M. S. (2011). Hyperbole, homunculi, and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 563–574
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–456
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 323–348
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 472–488
Morgan, P. L., Li, H., Farkas, G., Cook, M., Pun, W. H., & Hillemeier, M. M. (2017). Executive functioning deficits increase kindergarten children’s risk for reading and mathematics difficulties in first grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 23–32
Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment? Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 199–211
Niehaus, J., & Young, R. M. (2014). Cognitive models of discourse comprehension for narrative generation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(4), 561–582
Norris, D., Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., & Butterfield, S. (2006). Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 146–193
Nortvedt, G. A., Gustafsson, J. E., & Lehre, A. C. W. (2016). The importance of instructional quality for the relation between achievement in reading and mathematics.Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes,97–113
Palm, T. (2008). Impact of authenticity on sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 37–58
Primor, L., Pierce, M. E., & Katzir, T. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among Hebrew-speaking readers with and without a reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(2), 242–268
Rader, A. W., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2002). Processing of logically valid and logically invalid conditional inferences in discourse comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 59–68
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Psychologists Press
Robertson, D. A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Guidotti, S. J., Robertson, R. R., Irwin, W., Mock, B. J., & Campana, M. E. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(3), 255–260
Roehling, J. V., Hebert, M., Nelson, J. R., & Bohaty, J. J. (2017). Text structure strategies for improving expository reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 71–82
Schuh, J. M., Eigsti, I. M., & Mirman, D. (2016). Discourse comprehension in autism spectrum disorder: Effects of working memory load and common ground. Autism Research, 9(12), 1340–1352
Siemann, J., & Petermann, F. (2018). Evaluation of the Triple Code Model of numerical processing—Reviewing past neuroimaging and clinical findings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 72, 106–117
Silinskas, G., Leppänen, U., Aunola, K., Parrila, R., & Nurmi, J. E. (2010). Predictors of mothers’ and fathers’ teaching of reading and mathematics during kindergarten and Grade 1. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 61–71
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Fall, A. M., Roberts, G., Hall, C., & Miller, V. L. (2017). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below-average readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(1), 37–53
Swanson, H. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 471–491
Van Bon, W. H., & Van Der Pijl, J. M. (1997). Effects of word length and wordlikeness on pseudoword repetition by poor and normal readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 101–114
Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 2(2), 113–126
Varga, D. (2000). Hyperbole and humor in children’s language play. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14(2), 142–151
Wen, Y., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019). Parallel, cascaded, interactive processing of words during sentence reading. Cognition, 189, 221–226
Wu, X.(2003). The relation of working memory and language comprehension. (Master Dissertation of Hunan Normal University)
Wu, Y., Barquero, L. A., Pickren, S. E., Barber, A. T., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). The relationship between cognitive skills and reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 4. Learning and Individual Differences, 80(20), 1–14
Yang, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). The Relations between Cardinal Number Knowledge and Quantifier Comprehension.Language Learning and Development,1–17
Ye, X, L. (2018). Mechanisms of Working Memory and Quantitative Representation on Arithmetic Learning Difficulties in Primary School Children. (Doctor Dissertation of East China Normal University)
Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2018). Cognitive precursors of word reading versus arithmetic competencies in young Chinese children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 55–65