Competitive Reactions to Product Quality Improvements in Industrial Markets

European Journal of Marketing - 1994
JosLemmink1, HansKasper1
1University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Generally it is assumed that quality improvements are important tools for companies to gain a sustainable competitive advantage. The result of product quality improvements depends, for example on the reaction of competitors. If competitors react intensively and quickly, the outcome of a product quality improvement might be different from what was expected. From an empirical study in The Netherlands, concludes that, in general, the typical reaction of competitors is quite a fast reaction with only one marketing mix instrument. The intensity of the competitive reaction appears to be lower in mature and declining markets than it is in growing markets, and improvements in reliability and service quality aspects appear to be important weapons in quality competition. Service quality improvements are difficult to imitate swiftly. Moreover, they lead to higher market shares for the initiating company. Quality competition based on other quality aspects, like conformance to standards and performance, does not result in a real competitive advantage. For these quality improvements, following a “traditional” competitive pattern of action and, more‐or‐less the same reaction, are quite easy to imitate. They are also needed just to keep up with the leading competitors in the industry. However, they do not lead to long‐term sustainable advantages.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Biggadike, E.R., Corporate Diversification: Entry, Strategy and Performance, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, 1979.

2. Yip, G.S., Barriers to Entry, Lexington Books, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA, 1982.

3. Robinson, W.T., “Marketing Reactions to Entry”, Marketing Science, Vol. 7 No. 4, Fall 1988, pp. 368‐85.

4. Wildt, A.R., “Multifirm Analysis of Competitive Decision Variables”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XI, February 1974, pp. 50‐62.

5. Lambin, J.J., Naert, P.A. and Bultez, A., “Optimal Marketing Behavior in Oligopoly”, European Economic Review, Vol. 60, 1975, pp. 105‐28.

6. Hanssens, D.M., “Market Response, Competitive Behavior and Time Series Analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XVII, November 1980, pp. 470‐85.

7. Lemmink, J.G.A.M., Kwaliteitsconcurrentie tussen ondernemingen (Quality Competition between Firms), Proefschrift Datawyse, Maastricht, 1991.

8. Lemmink, J.G.A.M. and Kasper, J.D.P., “The Impact of Product Quality Improvements on Market Share and Net Profit in Industrial Markets”, in Baker, M.J. (Ed.), Perspectives on Marketing Management, Volume III, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993, pp. 319‐32.

9. Nightingale, J., “On the Definition of Industry and Market”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 27, 1978, pp. 31‐40.

10. Lilien, G.L., “ADVISOR 2: Modelling the Marketing Mix Decision for Industrial Products”, Management Science, Vol. 25, February 1979, pp. 191‐204.

11. Moss, S.J., An Economic Theory of Business Strategy, Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1981.

12. Burke, M.C., “Strategic Choice and Marketing Managers: An Examination of Business‐level Marketing Objectives”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXI, November 1984, pp. 345‐59.

13. Marris, R., The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1968.

14. Booy, H., Prijsreacties en oligopolie; Capita Selecta der Economie (Price Reactions and Oligopoly), H.E. Stenfert Kroese, Leiden, 1965.

15. Garvin, D.A., “What Does Product Quality Really Mean?”, Sloan Management Review, Fall1984, pp. 25‐43.

16. Alemson, M., “Demand, Entry and the Game of Conflict in Oligopoly over Time: Recent Australian Experience”, Oxford Economic Papers, 1969, pp. 220‐43.

17. Frey, J.B., commentary on “Marketing Mix Reactions to Entry”, Marketing Science, Vol. 7 No. 4, Fall 1988, pp. 386‐87.

18. Smith, S., A Note on the Interpretation and Analysis of the Linear Discriminant Model for Prediction and Classification, working paper 127, College of Business Administration, University of Oregon, OR, 1979.

19. Mosteller, F. and Wallace, D.F., “Influence in a Authorship Problem”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 58, June 1963, pp. 275‐309.

20. Aw, R.W. and Waters, D., “A Discriminant Analysis of Economic, Demographic, and Attitudinal Characteristics of Bank Charge‐card Customers”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 29, 1974, pp. 973‐80.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

European Journal of Marketing

Thông tin tác giả