Competition, fee-for-service requirements, and government performance: evidence on the Federal Reserve

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy - Tập 21 - Trang 315-356 - 2002
Ken S. Cavalluzzo1
1Department of Accounting, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alchian, 1965, The basis of some recent advances in the theory of management of the firm, Journal of Industrial Economics, 14, 30, 10.2307/2097649

Anderson, 1971

Ansari, 1987, Rational, rationalizing and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 549, 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90008-0

Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank, Annual Report, 1981; 1982; 1983

Banker, 2000, An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures, The Accounting Review, 75, 65, 10.2308/accr.2000.75.1.65

Bauer, 1993, Efficiency and technical progress in check processing, FRB Cleveland––Economic Review, 29, 24

Bauer, 1993, The efficiency of federal reserve check processing facilities, Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 287, 10.1016/0378-4266(93)90033-A

Bavon, 1995, Innovations in performance measurement systems: a comparative perspective, International Journal of Public Administration, 18, 491, 10.1080/01900699508525018

Beck, 1995, What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross section data, American Political Science Review, 89, 634, 10.2307/2082979

Blayney, P., Yokoyama, I., 1991. Comparative analysis of Japanese and Australian cost accounting and management practices. Working Paper, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Borcherding, 1982, Comparing the efficiency of private and public production: the evidence from five countries, Zeitschrift fur Natialokonomie, 127

Buchanan, 1978

Cavalluzzo, 1998, Competition, efficiency gains, and cost allocation changes in government agencies: evidence on the federal reserve, Journal of Accounting Research (Spring), 1, 10.2307/2491318

Caves, 1980, The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a competitive environment, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 958, 10.1086/260916

Chicago Federal Reserve Bank, Annual Report, 1981; 1982

Clarke, P., 1995. Management accounting practices and techniques in Irish manufacturing firms. Working Paper, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank, Annual Report, 1980; 1982

Cooper, 1995, Activity-based costing: theory and practice, 177

Davies, 1971, The efficiency of public versus private firms, the case of Australia’s two airlines, Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 149, 10.1086/466706

De Alessi, 1980, The economics of property rights: a review of the evidence, Research in Law and Economics, 2, 1

Domberger, 1986, Privatization policies and public enterprise: a survey, Economic Record, 62, 145, 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1986.tb00891.x

Domberger, 1986, Competitive tendering and efficiency: the case of refuse collection, Fiscal Studies, 69, 10.1111/j.1475-5890.1986.tb00530.x

Doran, 1983, On the relative efficiency of estimators which include the initial observations in the estimation of seemingly unrelated regressions with first-order autoregressive disturbances, Journal of Econometrics, 23, 165, 10.1016/0304-4076(93)90075-G

Downs, 1967

Federal Reserve, 1984. The Federal Reserve System: Purposes and Functions. Division of Support Services, Washington, DC

Ford, 1983, The changing role of the federal reserve in the payment system, Journal of Cash Management, 12

Furubotn, 1974

Gore, 1994

Greene, 2000

Hart, 1997, The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1127, 10.1162/003355300555448

Hayes, 1985, Exploring the sources of productivity differences at the factory level, 151

Heckman, J., Smith, J., Taber, C., 1996. What do bureaucrats do? In: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Growth, vol. 7, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 197–217

Humphrey, D., 1984. The US payments system: costs, pricing, competition, and risk. Monograph Series in Finance and Economics, Salomon Brothers and New York University, Monograph

Humphrey, 1985, Resource use in federal reserve check and ACH operations after pricing, Journal of Bank Research, 12, 45

Ittner, 1994, An examination of the indirect productivity gains from quality improvement, Production and Operations Management, 3, 153, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1994.tb00117.x

Ittner, 1998, Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance. An analysis of customer satisfaction, Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 1, 10.2307/2491304

Ittner, 1997, The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts, The Accounting Review, 231

Joyce, 1993, Using performance measures for federal budgeting: proposals and prospects, Public Budgeting and Finance, 3, 10.1111/1540-5850.00987

Kamensky, 1993, Program performance measures: designing a system to manage for results, Public Productivity and Management Review, 16, 395, 10.2307/3381017

Kmenta, 1970, Estimation of seemingly unrelated regressions with autoregressive disturbance, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 186, 10.2307/2283586

Langford, 1982, Public corporations in the 1980s: moving from rhetoric to analysis, Canadian Public Administration, 25, 619, 10.1111/j.1754-7121.1982.tb02098.x

McClintock, 1984, Impact of the monetary control act, Journal of Cash Management, 34

Niskanen, 1971

Osborne, 1993

Pankratz, 1983

Prais, S., Winsten, C., 1954. Trend estimators and serial correlation. Cowles Commission discussion paper no. 383, Chicago, IL

Rehfuss, 1991, A leaner, tougher public management? competition with private contractors, Public Administration Quarterly, 239

Savas, 1982

Spann, 1977, Public vs. private provision of government services

Smith, K., Sullivan, C., 1990. Survey of cost management systems in manufacturing. Working Paper, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Tullock, 1965