Giáo dục y khoa dựa trên năng lực và học thuật: Tạo ra một nền văn hóa học thuật tích cực trong thời gian nội trú

Perspectives on Medical Education - Tập 4 - Trang 254-258 - 2015
James A. Bourgeois1, Ana Hategan2, Amin Azzam3,4
1Department of Psychiatry/Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, Consultation-Liaison Service, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, USA
2Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
3Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco USA.
4School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley USA

Tóm tắt

Phong trào giáo dục y khoa dựa trên năng lực đã được áp dụng trong một số hệ thống giáo dục y khoa trên thế giới. Điều này có khả năng dẫn đến sự tham gia tích cực hơn của các bác sĩ nội trú trong quá trình giáo dục, vì học thuật được coi là một lĩnh vực năng lực chính. Những hoạt động học thuật đáng kể hoàn toàn nằm trong tầm với của những bác sĩ nội trú có động lực, đặc biệt là khi các giảng viên cung cấp đủ sự hướng dẫn. Những bác sĩ nội trú được trang bị học thuật này có lợi thế trong việc có được kinh nghiệm sớm trong các lĩnh vực khám phá học thuật, tích hợp, ứng dụng và giảng dạy. Trong bài viết này, tác giả xem xét tầm quan trọng của việc thiết lập các giai đoạn khởi đầu của năng suất học thuật trong việc tạo ra một nền văn hóa học thuật tích cực trong thời gian nội trú. Các chiến lược rõ ràng và nhất quán của tổ chức và phòng ban nhằm thúc đẩy phát triển học thuật trong thời gian nội trú được khuyến khích mạnh mẽ.

Từ khóa

#giáo dục y khoa #năng lực #học thuật #nội trú #văn hóa học thuật

Tài liệu tham khảo

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDs 2015. http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/canmeds/canmeds2015. Accessed 2 Feb 2015 Snell LS, Frank JR. Competencies, the tea bag model, and the end of time. Med Teach. 2010;32:629–30. Martinez J, Phillips E, Harris C. Where do we go from here? Moving from systems-based practice process measures to true competency via developmental milestones. Med Educ Online. 2014;19. doi:10.3402/meo.v19.24441. Brownie SM, Thomas J. A single competency-based education and training and competency-based career framework for the Australian health workforce: discussing the potential value add. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(4):215–21. Scheele F, Teunissen P, Van Luijk S, et al. Introducing competency-based postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):248–53. Frank JR, Snell LS, Sherbino J, editors. Draft CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework – Series III. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada;2014. Moskowitz EJ, Nash DB. Accreditation council for graduate medical education competencies: practice-based learning and systems-based practice. Am J Med Qual. 2007;22:351–82. Back SE, Book SW, Santos AB, et al. Training physician-scientists: a model for integrating research into psychiatric residency. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35:40–5. Yager J, Greden J, Abrams M, et al. The Institute of Medicine’s report on research training in psychiatry residency: strategies for reform-background, results, and follow up. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:267–74. Glassick CE. Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000;75:877–80. Grady EC, Roise A, Barr D, et al. Defining scholarly activity in graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:558–61. Leahy N, Sheps J, Tracy CS, et al. Family physicians’ attitudes toward education in research skills during residency: findings from a national mailed survey. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:413–4. Seehusen DA, Weaver SP. Resident research in family medicine: where are we now? Fam Med. 2009; 41:663–8. Neale AV. A national survey of research requirements for family practice residents and faculty. Fam Med. 2002;34:262–7. Hamoda HM, Bauer MS, DeMaso DR, et al. A competency-based model for research training during psychiatry residency. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19:78–85. Fogel J. Research as part of the career of a psychiatrist entering clinical practice. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33:269–72. Dunn LB. Strategies for academically oriented residents in psychiatry. In: Roberts LW, Hilty DM, editors. Handbook of career development in academic psychiatry and behavioral sciences. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2006. pag. 11–22. Ryan JG, Bonanno RJ, Dunn G, Fahrenwald R, Kirsch S. Required research a disservice? Fam Med. 1997;29(9):610–1. Hueston WJ. Research activity in family medicine: the ‘best of times’ or ‘can I have more, please’? J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21:4–5 Hebert RS, Levine RB, Smith CG, Wright SM. A systematic review of resident research curricula. Acad Med. 2003;78:61–8. Schott NJ, Emerick TD, Metro DG, et al. The cost of resident scholarly activity and its effect on resident clinical experience. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1211–6. Institute of Medicine. Resident duty hours: enhancing sleep, supervision, and safety. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2008. Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, et al. A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery. Impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1041–53. Parshuram CS, Amaral A, Ferguson ND. Patient safety, resident well-being and continuity of care with different resident duty schedules in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial. CMAJ. 2015. doi:10.1503/cmaj.140752. Zibrowski E M, Weston WW, Goldszmidt MA. ‘I don’t have time’: issues of fragmentation, prioritisation and motivation for education scholarship among medical faculty. Med Educ. 2008;42:872–8. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1103–15. Levy AS, Kata JT, Wolf MA, Sillman JS, Handin RI, Dzau JV. An initiative in mentoring to promote resident’s and faculty members’ careers. Acad Med. 2004;79(9):845–50. Melle E van, Curran V, Goldszmidt M, et al. Toward a common understanding: advancing education scholarship for clinical faculty in Canadian medical schools. A position paper. Ottawa: Canadian Association for Medical Education; 2012. Simpson DE, Marcdante KW, Duthie EH Jr, et al. Valuing educational scholarship at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Acad Med. 2000;75(9):930–4. LaMantia J, Kuhn GJ, Searle NS. The CORD Academy for scholarship in education in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17 Suppl 2:S13–5. Kirschner, PA, Merrienboer JJ van. Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educ Psychol. 2013;48:169–83. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On Horizon. 2001;9:1–6. Veen W, Vrakking B. Homo Zappiens: Growing up in a digital age. London: Network Continuum Education; 2006. Rowlands I, Nicholas D, Williams P, et al. The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings. 2008;60:290–310.