Comparison of the results of open PLIF versus UBE PLIF in lumbar spinal stenosis: postoperative adjacent segment instability is lesser in UBE
Tóm tắt
To compare the difference in efficacy between open PLIF and UBE for lumbar spinal stenosis and the effect on postoperative adjacent segment instability. The clinical data of 37 patients with PLIF and 32 patients with UBE for lumbar spinal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed to compare the differences in perioperative conditions and short- and medium-term outcomes. All 69 patients completed the surgery successfully. The operating time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies and hospital days were higher in the UBE group than in the open PLIF group. Intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage were lower than in the open PLIF group (P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain was lower in the UBE group than in the open PLIF group at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), and there were no statistically significant VAS scores for low back pain in the two groups at 1 day and 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). Leg pain VAS scores were lower in the UBE group than in the open PLIF group at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), and leg pain VAS scores were not statistically significant in both groups at 1 day postoperatively (P > 0.05). The ODI index was lower in the UBE group than in the open PLIF group at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) and was not statistically significant in the two groups at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in postoperative interbody height, sagittal diameter of the spinal canal, efficacy of modified MacNab and interbody fusion (P > 0.05). The open PLIF group was more prone to postoperative adjacent vertebral instability than the UBE group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). With appropriate indications, the open PLIF group and the UBE group had similar short- and medium-term clinical outcomes for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, but patients in the UBE group had better symptomatic improvement than the open PLIF group at 3 months postoperatively, and the effect on postoperative adjacent vertebral instability was smaller in the endoscopic group than in the open PLIF group.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattani A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Global Spine J. 2018;8(8):784–94.
Taiji R, Iwasaki H, Hashizume H, et al. Improving effect of microendoscopic decompression surgery on low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and predictive factors of postoperative residual low back pain: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):954.
Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, et al. Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2011;11(4):295–302.
Bresnahan LE, Smith JS, Ogden AT, et al. Assessment of paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area after lumbar decompression: minimally invasive versus open approaches. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(3):E162–8.
Kwon JW, Moon SH, Park SY, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: review update 2022. Asian Spine J. 2022;16(5):789–98.
Lu WW, Luk KD, Ruan DK, et al. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. Spine. 1999;24(13):1277–82.
Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Takakuda K, et al. A cadaveric study on the stability of lumbar segment after partial laminotomy and facetectomy with intact posterior ligaments. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9(6):518–26.
Hashimoto K, Aizawa T, Kanno H, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after fusion spinal surgery-a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2019;43(4):987–93.
Manfre L, De Vivo AE, Al Qatami H, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided lumbar trans-facet pedicle screw fixation in lumbar microinstability syndrome: feasibility of a novel approach. Neuroradiology. 2020;62(9):1133–40.
Muto M, Giurazza F, Guarnieri G, et al. Neuroimaging of spinal instability. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016;24(3):485–94.
Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, et al. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(2):143–9.
Briggs HMP. Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal. JBJS. 1944;26:125–30.
Pm L. A technical modification of Cloward’s posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 1977;1:118–24.
de Kunder SL, Rijkers K, Caelers I, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: a historical overview and a future perspective. Spine. 2018;43(16):1161–8.
Guigui P, Ferrero E. Surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(1S):S11–20.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2–18.
Wang MC, Yu KY, Zhang JG, et al. Progression and clinical application in unilateral biportal endoscopic. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;58(11):892–6.
Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, Duranceau J, Oxland T, Crisco JJ. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(11):1142–7.
Pao JL, Lin SM, Chen WC, et al. Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(2):438–46.
Soliman HM. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2282–9.
Eun SS, Eum JH, Lee SH, et al. Biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression for lumbar disk herniation and spinal canal stenosis: a technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2017;78(4):390–6.
Choi DJ, Choi CM, Jung JT, et al. Learning curve associated with complications in biportal endoscopic spinal surgery: challenges and strategies. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(4):624–9.
Pan A, Hai Y, Yang J, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(5):1522–32.
Pieper CC, Groetz SF, Nadal J, et al. Radiographic evaluation of ventral instability in lumbar spondylolisthesis: do we need extension radiographs in routine exams? Eur Spine J. 2014;23(1):96–101.
Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Sato K, Kurihara A, Yoshiya S, Nishida K, Miyamoto H, Doita M. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(4):284–90.
Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, et al. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology. 2007;245(1):62–77.
Kong WZ, Goel VK, Gilbertson LG, et al. Effects of muscle dysfunction on lumbar spine mechanics. A finite element study based on a two motion segments model. Spine. 1996;21(19):2197–206 (discussion 206–7).
Hakkinen A, Kuukkanen T, Tarvainen U, et al. Trunk muscle strength in flexion, extension, and axial rotation in patients managed with lumbar disc herniation surgery and in healthy control subjects. Spine. 2003;28(10):1068–73.
Heo DH, Lee DC, Park CK. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(5):E9.
Guha D, Heary RF, Shamji MF. Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis following laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis: systematic review and current concepts. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(4):E9.
Asgarzadie F, Khoo LT. Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes. Orthop Clin N Am. 2007;38(3):387–99 (abstract vi–vii).
Musluman AM, Cansever T, Yilmaz A, et al. Midterm outcome after a microsurgical unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):68–76.
Chen Z, Zhou H, Wang X, et al. Complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2023;170:e371–9.
Hong Y-H, Kim S-K, Suh D-W, et al. Novel instruments for percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery for full decompression and dural management: a comparative analysis. Brain Sci. 2020;10(8):516.
Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ. Risk factors and options of management for an incidental dural tear in biportal endoscopic spine surgery. Asian Spine J. 2020;14(6):790–800.
Heo DH, Ha JS, Lee DC, et al. Repair of incidental durotomy using sutureless nonpenetrating clips via biportal endoscopic surgery. Global Spine J. 2020;12(3):452–7.
Park HJ, Kim SK, Lee SC, et al. Dural tears in percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery: anatomical location and management. World Neurosurg. 2020;136:e578–85.
Ahn JS, Lee HJ, Choi DJ, et al. Extraforaminal approach of biportal endoscopic spinal surgery: a new endoscopic technique for transforaminal decompression and discectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(5):492–8.
Zheng B, Shaaya E, Feler J, et al. Endoscopic techniques for lumbar interbody fusion: principles and context. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:4979231.
Hara M, Takahashi H, Yokoyama Y, et al. Comparison of the invasiveness of conventional discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: differences in the methods of approach. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(1):40–7.