Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants
Tóm tắt
A compilation was made of 307 studies using nuclear DNA markers for evaluating among‐ and within‐population diversity in wild angiosperms and gymnosperms. Estimates derived by the dominantly inherited markers (RAPD, AFLP, ISSR) are very similar and may be directly comparable. STMS analysis yields almost three times higher values for within‐population diversity whereas among‐population diversity estimates are similar to those derived by the dominantly inherited markers. Number of sampled plants per population and number of scored microsatellite DNA alleles are correlated with some of the population genetics parameters. In addition, maximum geographical distance between sampled populations has a strong positive effect on among‐population diversity. As previously verified with allozyme data, RAPD‐ and STMS‐based analyses show that long‐lived, outcrossing, late successional taxa retain most of their genetic variability within populations. By contrast, annual, selfing and/or early successional taxa allocate most of the genetic variability among populations. Estimates for among‐ and within‐population diversity, respectively, were negatively correlated. The only major discrepancy between allozymes and STMS on the one hand, and RAPD on the other hand, concerns geographical range; within‐population diversity was strongly affected when the former methods were used but not so in the RAPD‐based studies. Direct comparisons between the different methods, when applied to the same plant material, indicate large similarities between the dominant markers and somewhat lower similarity with the STMS‐based data, presumably due to insufficient number of analysed microsatellite DNA loci in many studies.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barker JHA, 1999, Characterisation of genetic diversity in potential biomass willows (Salix spp.) by RAPD and AFLP analyses, Genome, 42, 173, 10.1139/g98-105
Campbell D, 2003, AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites, Molecular Ecology, 12, 1963, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01856.x
Goodman SJ, 1997, R ST calc: a collection of computer programs for calculating estimates of genetic differentiation from microsatellite data and determining their significance, Molecular Ecology, 6, 881, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1997.tb00143.x
Hamrick JL, 1989, Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources, 43
Hamrick JL, 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in London Series B
Marsh GD, 2002, Genetic structure of Senecio layneae (Composital): a rare plant of the chapparral, Madrono, 49, 150
Michalalakis Y, 1996, A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci, Genetics, 142, 1061, 10.1093/genetics/142.3.1061
Olsen KM, 2001, Microsatellite variation in cassava (, Manihot Esculenta, 88, 131
Powell W, The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis, Molecular Breeding, 2, 225, 10.1007/BF00564200
SlatkinM(1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies.Genetics 139 457–462.
Squirrel J, 2003, How much effort is required to isolate nuclear microsatellites from plants?, Molecular Ecology, 12, 1339, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01825.x
Sun G‐L, 1999, Genetic diversity in Elymus caninus as revealed by isozyme, RAPD, and microsatellite markers, Genome, 42, 420, 10.1139/g98-130
Wachira F, 2001, Genetic variation and differentiation in tea (Camellia sinensis) germplasm revealed by RAPD and AFLP variation, Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 76, 557
Weising K, 1995, DNA Fingerprinting in Plants and Fungi