Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems - Tập 20 Số 4 - Trang 193-205 - 2005
Emmanuel K. Yiridoe1, Samuel Bonti‐Ankomah2, Ralph C. Martin3
1Department of Business and Social Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 5E3, Canada,.
2Agri-Food Chain and Integrated Risk Management Analysis, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada,.
3Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada and Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, PO Box 550, Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 5E3, Canada,.

Tóm tắt

AbstractGrowing interest in organic agriculture has prompted numerous studies that compare various aspects of organic and conventionally produced foods. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of empirical studies comparing organic products and conventionally grown alternatives. The emphasis is on key organic consumer demand and marketing issues, including: (1) the implications of an economic definition of organically grown food for consumer demand; (2) attributes that shoppers consider most when comparing organic with conventionally grown products; (3) level and characteristics of consumer knowledge and awareness about organic food; (4) assessment methods and characteristics of organic consumer attitudes and preferences; (5) size of price premium and characteristics of consumers’ willingness-to-pay for organic products; and (6) profile of organic consumers. Overall, although there is some knowledge and awareness about organic products, consumers are not consistent in their interpretation of what is organic. Secondly, while consumers typically understand the broad issues about organic foods, many tend not to understand the complexities and niceties of organic farming practices and organic food quality attributes. Uncertainty regarding the true attributes of organic, and skepticism about organic labels, part of which stems from reported cases of (inadvertent) mislabeling, and product misrepresentation, and partly because of nonuniform organic standards and certification procedures, may hold some consumers back from purchasing organic. Thirdly, concern for human health and safety, which is a key factor that influences consumer preference for organic food, is consistent with observed deterioration in human health over time and, therefore, motivates consumers to buy organic food as insurance and/or investment in health. Fourthly, the proportion of consumers who are willing to pay a price premium for organic food decreases with premium level. On the other hand, premiums tend to increase with (combinations of) preferred attributes. In addition, demand tends to depend more on the price differential with respect to conventionally grown products, than on actual price. In contrast to sensitivity of demand to changes in price, income elasticity of demand for organic foods is generally small. Finally, it is important for policy analysts and researchers to note that organic fresh fruits and vegetables currently dominate the organic consumer's food basket. Furthermore, it is not clear whether frequent buyers consider particular organic products (e.g., organic meat) as normal goods, or if consumers consider such products as luxury goods.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1086/466756

48 Wolf M.M. 2002. An analysis of the impact of price on consumer interest in organic grapes and a profile of organic purchasers. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California, 28–31 July.

10.1080/10408690290825439

10.1108/07363760210451410

78 Wier M. , Hansen L.G. , and Smed S. 2001. Explaining demand for organic foods. Paper presented at the 11th Annual EAERE Conference,Southampton,England.

11 Food and Agricultural Organization. 1999. Organic agriculture [online]. Available at Web site http://www.fao.org/unfao/bodies/COAG/COAG15/X0075E.htm#P78_976 (verified 30 November 2004). Proceedings of the Fifteenth Session of the Committee on Agriculture, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

72 Millock K. , Hansen L.G. , Wier M. , and Andersen L.M. 2002. Willingness to pay for organic foods: A comparison between survey data and panel data from Denmark. [online]. Available at: http://www.akf.dk/organicfoods/conference/willingness.pdf (verified 6 December 2004). Proceedings of the Conference on Consumer Demand for Organic Foods, Denmark.

10.1108/00070700210425787

10.1093/erae/23.3.331

Baker, 1993, Measuring food safety preferences: identifying consumer segments, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18, 277

79 Van Ravenswaay E. and Hoehn J.P. 1991. Contingent valuation and food safety: the case of pesticide residues in food. Staff paper No. 91–13. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

10.17660/ActaHortic.1990.259.14

10.1002/1520-6297(199011)6:6<593::AID-AGR2720060606>3.0.CO;2-Z

14 Torjusen H. , Nyberg A. , and Wandel M. 1999. Organic food: consumers' perceptions and dietary choices [online]. Available at Web site http://www.sifo.no/english/publications/environment/1999–05.htm (verified 30 November 2004). SIFO-Report No. 5–1999. Oslo, Norway.

10.2307/1244215

Wang, 1997, Agricultural Production and Nutrition, 187

10.2307/1244088

10.1300/J047v08n04_02

10.2307/1242447

10.1086/259880

50 Øystein S. , Persillet V. , and Sylvander B. 2001. The consumers' faithfulness and competence in regard to organic products: Comparison between France and Norway. Paper Presented at the 2002 IFOAM Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

Fishbein, 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research

10.1111/j.1744-7976.2002.tb00380.x

61 The Packer. 2001. Fresh Trends 2001: Understanding consumers and produce. [online]. Available at Web site: http://www.pma.com (verified July 2004). Produce Marketing Association Fresh Summit 2000 Workshop Summary.

71 Bailey W.C. 1996. Comparative study of the willingness to pay for organic and irradiated meat products—An experimental design. NE-165 Working Paper Series, WP-48. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut.

10.1017/S0021859600068817

Lancaster, 1991, Modern Consumer Theory

Hack, 1993, Organically grown products: Perception, preferences and motives of Dutch consumers, Acta Horticulturae, 340, 247

10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199601/02)12:1<89::AID-AGR8>3.0.CO;2-L

10.1108/00070700210425723

10.17660/ActaHortic.1984.155.38

10.1108/00070709510104529

10.1111/1467-8489.00060

Jolly, 1989, Organic foods: Consumer attitudes and use, Food Technology, 43, 60

10.1108/00070709110002706

10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00044-X

10.1017/S1068280500006481

10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00004-3

10.1108/00070709510104303

Jolly, 1991, Differences between buyers and non-buyers of organic produce and willingness to pay organic price premiums, Journal of Agribusiness, 9, 97

Lo, 2002, Results of routing testing of organic food for agrochemical residues, 61

10.1017/S0889189300004227

76 Turco G. 2002. Organic food - an opportunity at who's expense? [online]. Available at http://www.rabobank.com/repository/far/farpublications.pdf (verified 6 December 2004). Industry Note, Food and Agribusiness Research. Rabobank International, Sydney, Australia.

10.1016/0167-4870(94)00034-8

19 Hansen L.G. 2001. Modeling demand for organic products—Implications for the questionnaire [online]. Available at Web site http://www.akf.dk/organicfoods/papers/wp4-lgh.pdf (verified 30 August 2004). Working Paper 4. AKF, Danish Institute of Local Government Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark.

27 Sparling E. , Wilken K. , and McKenzie J. 1992. Marketing fresh produce in Colorado supermarkets. Report to Colorado Department of Agriculture and USDA Federate State Marketing Improvement Program, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

10.1017/S0889189300004471

Estes, 1994, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

10.1016/0167-8809(89)90109-6

1996, Fresh Trends—A 1996 Profile of the Fresh Produce Consumer

Petterson, 1977, A comparison between conventional and bio-dynamic farming systems as indicated by yield and quality, BioDynamics, 124, 19

Buzby, 1994, Consumers want reduced exposure to pesticides in food, Food Review, 17, 19

10.1108/00070700210425778

10.1017/S0889189300003933

10.1007/BF02370931

10.1108/00070700210425697

10.1016/0167-8809(96)01027-4

Hutchins, 1997, Organic confusion: Sustaining competitive advantage, British Food Journal, 99, 336

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199707)74:3<281::AID-JSFA794>3.0.CO;2-Z

10.1080/03670244.1979.9990543

10.4315/0362-028X-60.11.1400

10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.295.18

MacEachern, 1990, Save Our Planet—750 Everyday Ways You Can Help Clean Up the Earth

Hussein, 2000, On-farm factors can decrease risk of E. coli contamination, Feedstuffs, 13, 18

10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300040010x

10.1300/J046v09n02_03

68 The Packer. 2002. Fresh trends 2002: Key findings of Packer's fresh trends report. [online]. Available at Web site http://www.bountyfresh.com/fresh_report4.htm (verified July 2004).

10.1108/00070700210425949

Goldman, 1972, The Basic Book of Organically Grown Foods

65 Aguirre G.J.A. 2001. Marketing and consumption of organic products in Costa Rica. Working Paper No. 5. The School for Field Studies, Centre for Sustainable Development, Atenas, Costa Rica.

10.1108/00070700210425732

10.1007/BF01095422

Menghi, 1997, Consumer response to ecological milk in Sweden

10.5367/000000000101293310

10.1108/00070700210425921

Schmidt, 1999, Safe food: an all-consuming issue, Environmental Health Perspectives, 107, A144, 10.2307/3434501

10.1007/BF01094025

10.1108/00070700210434570

Demeritt, 2002, All Things Organic 2002: A Look at the Organic Consumer

10.1016/S0315-5463(89)70322-9

10.1086/259630

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Tập 20 Số 4

193-205

Thông tin tác giả