Comparison of Prophylactic Anti-Emetic Effects of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone in Women Undergoing Day-Case Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Journal of International Medical Research - Tập 31 Số 6 - Trang 481-488 - 2003
Mustafa Şahin Yüksek1, H. A. Alici1, Alı Fuat Erdem1, Mehmet Cesur1
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

Tóm tắt

We aimed to determine the effect of ondansetron and dexamethasone on preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Sixty women undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery were randomized to receive ondansetron 4 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg or saline. Drugs were administered 2 min before induction of anaesthesia, and anaesthesia and post-operative analgesic regimens were standardized. The incidence of PONV in the first 24 h after the operation was 35% in the ondansetron group, 55% in dexamethasone group and 85% in the control group. A significant difference between the groups was only seen in the first 3 h post-operatively. In this period, ondansetron was significantly more effective than dexamethasone and saline, but no differences were seen between dexamethasone and saline. In all treatment groups, post-operative visual analogue scale scores, sedation scores and usage of analgesics were similar. In conclusion, ondansetron, but not dexamethasone, prevented PONV in the first 3 h after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.117-az0113.x

10.1093/bja/70.2.135

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03576.x

10.1093/bja/83.4.611

10.1213/00000539-199109000-00003

10.1213/00000539-199710000-00015

10.1001/jama.1989.03430210050028

10.1097/00000542-199207000-00023

10.1097/00006565-198706000-00007

10.1213/00000539-198912000-00010

10.1213/00000539-199710000-00036

Wang JJ, 1999, Anesth Analg, 89, 200

10.1213/00000539-199611000-00004

Dicato MA, 1992, Eur J Anaesthesiol, 9, 19

10.1213/00000539-199106000-00005

10.1177/0310057X9402200203

10.1016/S0385-8146(02)00004-4

10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02323.x

10.1093/bja/87.4.588

10.1097/00000539-200001000-00038

10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00581.x

10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00504.x

10.1213/00000539-199906000-00032

10.1007/BF03009605

10.1093/bja/83.5.761

10.1093/bja/69.supplement_1.63S

10.1097/00000542-198809000-00027

10.2165/00003495-200059020-00005

10.1056/NEJM198108273050914

10.1056/NEJM198408303110901

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07474.x

10.1093/bja/83.5.772

10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013470

Tzeng JI, 2000, Acta Anaesthesiol Sin, 38, 137

Fujii Y, 2002, Obstet Gynecol, 99, 58

Wang JJ, 2000, Anesth Analg, 91, 136, 10.1213/00000539-200007000-00025

10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05294.x