Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Versus Biological Indexing for the Optimal Detection of Viral Pathogens in Grapevine

Phytopathology - Tập 105 Số 6 - Trang 758-763 - 2015
Maher Al Rwahnih1, Steve Daubert1, Deborah Golino1, Christina M. Islas1, Adib Rowhani1
1Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis 95616.

Tóm tắt

A bioassay is routinely used to determine the viral phytosanitary status of commercial grapevine propagation material in many countries around the world. That test is based on the symptoms developed in the field by specific indicator host plants that are graft-inoculated from the vines being tested. We compared the bioassay against next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of grapevine material. NGS is a laboratory procedure that catalogs the genomic sequences of the viruses and other pathogens extracted as DNA and RNA from infected vines. NGS analysis was found to be superior to the standard bioassay in detection of viruses of agronomic significance, including virus infections at low titers. NGS was also found to be superior to the bioassay in its comprehensiveness, the speed of its analysis, and for the discovery of novel, uncharacterized viruses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00545.x

10.1016/j.virol.2009.02.028

10.1007/s00705-010-0869-8

10.1094/PHYTO-10-12-0253-R

10.1016/j.virusres.2011.10.018

10.1128/JVI.01444-12

10.1094/PHYTO-04-11-0114

10.1007/s11262-011-0607-7

10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01258.x

10.3390/v6010106

10.3390/ijms12117861

Brister R. J., 2014, Nucleic Acids Res.

10.1371/journal.pone.0102945

10.1016/j.virol.2010.01.023

10.1111/j.1755-0238.2012.00204.x

10.1094/Phyto-70-394

10.1016/j.virusres.2011.10.010

Golino D. A., 1992, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 43, 200, 10.5344/ajev.1992.43.2.200

10.1016/j.virol.2009.03.024

10.1016/j.virusres.2008.02.015

10.3389/fmicb.2013.00082

Martelli G. P., 2014, J. Plant Pathol., 96, 7

10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.029

10.1099/vir.0.80815-0

10.1099/vir.0.81533-0

10.1016/j.coviro.2011.12.004

10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174

10.1371/journal.pone.0064194

10.1186/1743-422X-10-324

10.1007/s13337-013-0133-4

10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033

10.5344/ajev.2011.10104

10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.11.1238

10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.7.799

10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135919

10.1371/journal.pone.0088513

10.1094/PHYTO-02-11-0034