Comparison between meloxicam and transdermally administered fentanyl for treatment of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing osteotomy of the tibia and fibula and placement of a uniplanar external distraction device

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association - Tập 227 Số 11 - Trang 1768-1774 - 2005
Pilar Lafuente1, Jordi Franch2,3,4,5, I. Durall2,3,4,5, Ma Carmen Díaz‐Bertrana2,3,4,5, Rosa M. Márquez2,3,4,5
1Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
238th National Conference of the Spanish Small Animal Veterinary Association, Sevilla, Spain, October 2003.
3Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
4From the Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
5Ingelheim España.

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjective—To compare the efficacy of meloxicam administered perioperatively with transdermal administration of fentanyl via a patch placed preoperatively in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery.Design—Prospective study.Animals—16 dogs.Procedure—Unilateral or bilateral osteotomy of the tibia and fibula was surgically performed, and a uniplanar external distraction device was placed in each limb. Postoperative pain and lameness were assessed 24, 48, and 72 hours after administration of the first of 3 doses of meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg [0.09 mg/lb], IV, given preoperatively, followed by 0.1 mg/kg [0.045 mg/lb], IV, after 24 hours, and 0.1 mg/kg, PO, after 48 hours) or preoperative placement of a transdermal fentanyl patch (50 μg/h) left in place for 72 hours.Results—No significant differences in total pain scores were detected between groups. Mean ± SD lameness scores assessed at 24 and 72 hours were lower in dogs in the meloxicam group than dogs in the fentanyl group. Lameness scores decreased with time in a similar manner in both treatment groups.Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Perioperative administration of meloxicam or preoperative placement of a transdermal fentanyl patch provided effective and similar postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery. However, because of its anti-inflammatory effects, treatment with meloxicam reduced the degree of lameness and resulted in rapid functional recovery of the limb. (J Am Vet Med Assoc2005;227:1768–1774)

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Slingsby LS, 2000, J Small Anim Pract, 41, 447, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2000.tb03139.x

Hellyer PW, 1998, Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet, 20, 140

Pascoe PJ, 2000, Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 30, 757, 10.1016/S0195-5616(08)70005-6

Robinson TM, 1999, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 35, 95, 10.5326/15473317-35-2-95

Egger CM, 1998, Vet Surg, 27, 159, 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00114.x

Hofmeister EH, 2004, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 40, 468, 10.5326/0400468

10.1111/j.1467-2987.2004.00158.x

10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1557

Balmer TV, 1998, J Small Anim Pract, 39, 158, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03623.x

10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1557

Grisneaux E, 1999, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 215, 1105, 10.2460/javma.1999.215.08.1105

10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.882

Pibarot P, 1997, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 211, 438, 10.2460/javma.1997.211.04.438

Slingsby LS, 1998, Vet Rec, 143, 185, 10.1136/vr.143.7.185

10.1111/j.1748-5827.2002.tb00074.x

10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1429

10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1755

Doig PA, 2000, Can Vet J, 41, 296

Forsyth SF, 1998, J Small Anim Pract, 39, 421, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03748.x

10.1007/BF01630479

Yaksh TL, 2001, J Neurosci, 21, 5847, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-05847.2001

10.1097/00000542-200502000-00026

10.1046/j.1435-6935.2002.00007.x

Firth AM, 1999, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 214, 651, 10.2460/javma.1999.214.05.651

Holton L, 2001, Vet Rec, 148, 525, 10.1136/vr.148.17.525

Morton DB, 1985, Vet Rec, 116, 431, 10.1136/vr.116.16.431

Forell EB, 1993, J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 29, 460

Holton LL, 1998, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 212, 61, 10.2460/javma.1998.212.01.61

Conzemius MG, 1997, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 210, 1619, 10.2460/javma.1997.210.11.1619

10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01079-9

Holton LL, 1998, J Small Anim Pract, 39, 469, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03681.x

Busch U, 1998, Drug Metab Dispos, 26, 576

10.1007/PL00000219

10.1002/bdd.446

10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00109.x

Paddleford RR, 1999, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 12

Moiniche S, 1997, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 41, 785, 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04784.x

Melzack R, 2001, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 933, 157, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05822.x

Cross AR, 1997, Am J Vet Res, 58, 626, 10.2460/ajvr.1997.58.06.626

10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04088.x

Laredo FG, 2004, Vet Rec, 155, 667, 10.1136/vr.155.21.667

Lascelles BDX, 2001, J Small Anim Pract, 42, 587, 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2001.tb06034.x

10.1111/j.1748-5827.2002.tb00059.x

Mathews KA, 1996, Can Vet J, 37, 557