Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms

Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 47-62 - 2003
D. P. Hohm1, Michael Ropp1
1Electrical Engineering Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 5700‐2220, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractMaximum power point trackers (MPPTs) play an important role in photovoltaic (PV) power systems because they maximize the power output from a PV system for a given set of conditions, and therefore maximize the array efficiency. Thus, an MPPT can minimize the overall system cost. MPPTs find and maintain operation at the maximum power point, using an MPPT algorithm. Many such algorithms have been proposed. However, one particular algorithm, the perturb‐and‐observe (P&O) method, claimed by many in the literature to be inferior to others, continues to be by far the most widely used method in commercial PV MPPTs. Part of the reason for this is that the published comparisons between methods do not include an experimental comparison between multiple algorithms with all algorithms optimized and a standardized MPPT hardware. This paper provides such a comparison. MPPT algorithm performance is quantified through the MPPT efficiency. In this work, results are obtained for three optimized algorithms, using a microprocessor‐controlled MPPT operating from a PV array and also a PV array simulator. It is found that the P&O method, when properly optimized, can have MPPT efficiencies well in excess of 97%, and is highly competitive against other MPPT algorithms. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

KatanRE AgelidisVG NayarCV.Performance analysis of a solar water pumping system.Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth (PEDES) 1996;81–87.

TahaMS SureshK.Maximum power point tracking inverter for photovoltaic source pumping applications.Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth (PEDES) 1996;883–886.

10.1109/63.903988

WonC‐Y KimD‐H KimS‐C KimW‐S KimH‐S.A new maximum power point tracker of photovoltaic arrays using fuzzy controller.Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC) 1994;396–403.

HuaC ShenC.Comparative study of peak power tracking techniques for solar storage systems.IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition—APEC Proceedings of the 1998 13th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition1998;2:697–685.

10.1049/ip-gtd:19951577

Kim Y, 1996, A new peak power tracker for cost‐effective photovoltaic power systems, IEEE Proceedings, 3, 1673

KawamuraT et al.Analysis of MPPT characteristics in photovoltaic power systems.Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells Proceedings of the 1996 9th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference PVSEC‐91997;47(14):155–165.

10.1109/41.649937

AndersenM AlvstenB.200W low cost module integrated utility interface for modular photovoltaic energy systems.IECON: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Electronics Control and Instrumentation1995;1(1):572–577.

van der Merwe L, 1998, Maximum power point tracking—implementation strategies, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 1, 214, 10.1109/ISIE.1998.707779

10.1016/0379-6787(84)90002-4

10.1016/0038-092X(91)90095-E

BrambillaA et al.New approach to photovoltaic arrays maximum power point tracking.Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Power Electronics Conference 1998;632–637.

Hovel HJ, 1975, Semiconductors and Semimetals: Solar Cells, 64ff

FraasLM AveryJE GruenbaumPE SundaramVS.Fundamental characterization studies of GaSb solar cells.Proceedings of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 1991;80–84.

10.1109/41.661310

WonC‐Y KimD‐H KimS‐C KimW‐S KimH‐S.New maximum power point tracker of photovoltaic arrays using fuzzy controller.Proceedings of the 1994 25th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference1994;2:396–403.