Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson N. H., 1958, The role of Typhlodromus spp. in British Columbia apple orchards, Proc. 10th Intern. Congr. Ent., Montreal (1956), 4, 659
Andrewartha H. G.andL. C.Birch(1954)The distribution and abundance of animals.University of Chicago Press Chicago.
Chant D. A., 1959, Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the Phytoseiidae, with description of 38 new species, Can. Ent., 91, 1
Chant D. A., 1963, Some mortality factors and the dynamics of orchard mites, Mem. Ent. Soc. Can., 32, 33, 10.4039/entm9532033-1
Dosse G., 1958, Über einige neue Raubmilbenarten (Acar., Phytoseiidae), Pflanzenschtzber., 21, 44
Fransz H. G., 1974, The functional response to prey density in an acarine system.
Hassell M. P., 1971, Proc. Adv. Study Inst. Dynamics Number Popul. (Oosterbeek, 1970, 366
Holling C. S., 1966, The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density, Mem. Ent. Soc. Can., 48, 3
Iwao S., 1971, Proc. Adv. Study Inst. Dynamics Number Popul. (Oosterbeek, 1970, 129
Krantz G. W., 1970, A manual of acarology., 2
Kuchlein J. H., 1965, A reconsideration of the role of predaceous mites in the control of the European red spider mite in orchards, Agric. Bachie. Ser., 113
Kuno E., 1968, Studies on the population dynamics of rice leafhoppers in a paddy field, Bull. Kyushu Agric. Exp. Sta., 14, 131
Laing J. E., 1968, Life history and life table of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias‐Henriot, Acarologia, 10, 578
Mook L. J., 1963, Birds and the spruce budworm. In The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Morris, R. F., ed, Mem. Ent. Soc. Can., 31, 268
Mori H., 1969, Proc. 2nd Intern. Congr. Acarology, Sutton‐Bonnington, England, 149
Mori H.(1975)Biological control of tetranychid mites by the predacious mite Phytoseiulus persimilisAthias‐Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). InJIBP Synthesis 7: Approaches to Biological Control.Yasumatsu K.andH.Mori eds. pp.39–46.
Mori H.andD. A.Chant(1966)The influence of prey density relative humidity and starvation on the predacious behavior ofPhytoseiulus persimilisAthias‐Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)Can.J. Zool.44:483–491.
Oatman E. R., 1965, Predaceous mite controls two‐spotted spider mite on strawberry, California Agr., 19, 6
Rubin A.(1969)Observations on the biology of the Israeli predacious mite Iphiseius degeneransBerlese in the laboratory comparing feeding habits in the citrus orchard and on castor bean.Proc. Ent. Soc. Amer. Yasima Washington(1969). pp.29–30. Abstract No. 53.
Sandness J.N., 1969, Ph. D. thesis
Smith F. F. T. J.HenneberryandA. L.Boswell(1963)The pesticide tolerance ofTyphlodromus fallacis(Garman) andPhytoseiulus persimilisA–H. with some observations on the predator efficiency ofP. persimilis.J. Econ. Ent.56:274–278.
Woods D. L., 1983, Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles, Symp. R. Ent. Soc. London., 6, 101