Phân tích metabolomics và transcriptomics so sánh tiết lộ mạng lưới đồng biểu hiện của con đường chuyển hóa carotenoid trong chùm bông của Setaria italica
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
#carotenoid #kiều mạch #metabolomics #transcriptomics #đất trồng #gene đồng biểu hiện #mạng lưới điều hòa geneTài liệu tham khảo
Doust AN, et al. Foxtail millet: a sequence-driven grass model system. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(1):137–41.
Diao X, Jia G. Origin and domestication of foxtail millet. In: Doust A, Diao X, editors. Genetics and genomics of setaria. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 61–72.
Zhang G, et al. Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(6):549–54.
Bennetzen JL, et al. Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(6):555–61.
Yang Z, et al. A mini foxtail millet with an Arabidopsis-like life cycle as a C4 model system. Nat Plants. 2020;6(9):1167–78.
Wang J, et al. De novo genome assembly of a foxtail millet cultivar Huagu11 uncovered the genetic difference to the cultivar Yugu1, and the genetic mechanism of imazethapyr tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):271.
Peng R, Zhang B. Foxtail millet: a new model for C4 plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26(3):199–201.
Lata C, Gupta S, Prasad M. Foxtail millet: a model crop for genetic and genomic studies in bioenergy grasses. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013;33(3):328–43.
Okarter N, Liu RH. Health benefits of whole grain phytochemicals. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50(3):193–208.
Shen R, et al. Identification of carotenoids in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and the effects of cooking methods on carotenoid content. J Cereal Sci. 2015;61:86–93.
Zhang B, et al. Carotenoid composition and expression of biosynthetic genes in yellow and white foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv]. J Cereal Sci. 2019;85:84–90.
Fiedor J, Burda K. Potential role of carotenoids as antioxidants in human health and disease. Nutrients. 2014;6(2):466–88.
Moreau RA, et al. A comparison of the levels of oil, carotenoids, and lipolytic enzyme activities in modern lines and hybrids of grain sorghum. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2016;93(4):569–73.
Lamberts L, Delcour JA. Carotenoids in raw and parboiled brown and milled rice. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(24):11914–9.
Qin X, et al. Distinct expression and function of carotenoid metabolic genes and homoeologs in developing wheat grains. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):155.
Rodriguez-Concepcion M. Supply of precursors for carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;504(1):118–22.
Vranova E, Coman D, Gruissem W. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:665–700.
Watkins JL, Pogson BJ. Prospects for carotenoid biofortification targeting retention and catabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(5):501–12.
Bae G, Choi G. Decoding of light signals by plant phytochromes and their interacting proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59(1):281–311.
Shi H, et al. Arabidopsis DET1 degrades HFR1 but stabilizes PIF1 to precisely regulate seed germination. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(12):3817.
Lu S, et al. A fruit ripening-associated transcription factor CsMADS5 positively regulates carotenoid biosynthesis in citrus. J Exp Bot. 2015;72(8):3028–43.
Paine JA, et al. Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin a content. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(4):482–7.
Zunjare RU, et al. Influence of rare alleles of β-carotene hydroxylase and lycopene epsilon cyclase genes on accumulation of provitamin a carotenoids in maize kernels. Plant Breed. 2017;136(6):872–80.
Cao H, et al. A neighboring aromatic-aromatic amino acid combination governs activity divergence between tomato phytoene synthases. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(4):1988–2003.
Macrae A, et al. Phenology of the genetic model Setaria viridis (Poaceae) according to the BBCH-scale of development. Bot J Linn Soc. 2020;192(1):224–41.
Nogueira M, et al. Subchromoplast sequestration of carotenoids affects regulatory mechanisms in tomato lines expressing different carotenoid gene combinations. Plant Cell. 2013;25(11):4560–79.
Chen C, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.
Nicolaides NC, Stoeckert CJ Jr. A simple, efficient method for the separate isolation of RNA and DNA from the same cells. Biotechniques. 1990;8(2):154–6.
Pertea M, et al. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(9):1650–67.
Wang L, et al. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):136–8.
Kanehisa M, et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D480–4.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.
Brinkman H-J, et al. High food prices and the global financial crisis have reduced access to nutritious food and worsened nutritional status and health. J Nutr. 2010;140(1):153S–61S.
Digesù AM, et al. Genetic variability in yellow pigment components in cultivated and wild tetraploid wheats. J Cereal Sci. 2009;50(2):210–8.
Leenhardt F, et al. Genetic variability of carotenoid concentration, and lipoxygenase and peroxidase activities among cultivated wheat species and bread wheat varieties. Eur J Agron. 2006;25(2):170–6.
Taylor KL, et al. High-performance liquid chromatography profiling of the major carotenoids in Arabidopsis thaliana leaf tissue. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1121(1):83–91.
Song J, et al. Comparison of carotenoid composition in immature and mature grains of corn (Zea Mays L.) varieties. Int J Food Prop. 2016;19(2):351–8.
Owens BF, et al. A foundation for provitamin a biofortification of maize: genome-wide association and genomic prediction models of carotenoid levels. Genetics. 2014;198(4):1699–716.
Li P, et al. Carotenoid biosynthetic genes in Brassica rapa: comparative genomic analysis, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):492.
Blanc G, Wolfe KH. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution[W]. Plant Cell. 2004;16(7):1679–91.
Carretero-Paulet L, et al. Enhanced flux through the methylerythritol 4-phosphate pathway in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;62(4):683–95.
Walter MH, Hans J, Strack D. Two distantly related genes encoding 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthases: differential regulation in shoots and apocarotenoid-accumulating mycorrhizal roots. Plant J. 2002;31(3):243–54.
Phillips MA, et al. Functional identification and differential expression of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase in induced terpenoid resin formation of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65(3):243–57.
Cordoba E, et al. Functional characterization of the three genes encoding 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase in maize. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(6):2023–38.
Berthelot K, et al. Isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase: a checkpoint to isoprenoid biosynthesis. Biochimie. 2012;94(8):1621–34.
Albrecht M, Sandmann G. Light-stimulated carotenoid biosynthesis during transformation of maize etioplasts is regulated by increased activity of isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase. Plant Physiol. 1994;105(2):529–34.
Sun J, et al. A novel cytoplasmic isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): cloning, expression, and color complementation. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2010;28(3):473–80.
Gallagher C, Cervantes-Cervantes M, Wurtzel E. Surrogate biochemistry: use of Escherichia coli to identify plant cDNAs that impact metabolic engineering of carotenoid accumulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;60(6):713–9.
Jin H, Song Z, Nikolau BJ. Reverse genetic characterization of two paralogous acetoacetyl CoA thiolase genes in Arabidopsis reveals their importance in plant growth and development. Plant J. 2012;70(6):1015–32.
Ye X, et al. Engineering the provitamin a (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science. 2000;287(5451):303.
Fraser PD, et al. Manipulation of phytoene levels in tomato fruit: effects on isoprenoids, plastids, and intermediary metabolism. Plant Cell. 2007;19(10):3194–211.
Tomato Genome C. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012;485(7400):635–41.
Li F, Murillo C, Wurtzel ET. Maize Y9 encodes a product essential for 15-cis-zeta-carotene isomerization. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(2):1181–9.
Xi W, et al. The genes of CYP, ZEP, and CCD1/4 play an important role in controlling carotenoid and aroma volatile apocarotenoid accumulation of apricot fruit. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:2105.
Suematsu K, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis implied a ZEP paralog was a key gene involved in carotenoid accumulation in yellow-fleshed sweetpotato. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20607.
Gonzalez-Jorge S, et al. ZEAXANTHIN EPOXIDASE activity potentiates carotenoid degradation in maturing seed. Plant Physiol. 2016;171(3):1837–51.
Cruet-Burgos C, et al. Advancing provitamin a biofortification in sorghum: Genome-wide association studies of grain carotenoids in global germplasm. Plant Genome. 2020;13(1):e20013.
Schaub P, et al. Nonenzymatic β-carotene degradation in provitamin a-biofortified crop plants. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65(31):6588–98.
Bruno M, et al. Enzymatic study on AtCCD4 and AtCCD7 and their potential to form acyclic regulatory metabolites. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(21):5993–6005.
Ohmiya A, et al. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CmCCD4a) contributes to white color formation in chrysanthemum petals. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(3):1193–201.
García-Limones C, et al. Functional characterization of FaCCD1: a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase from strawberry involved in lutein degradation during fruit ripening. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(19):9277–85.
Campbell R, et al. The metabolic and developmental roles of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase4 from potato. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(2):656–64.
Shin J, et al. Phytochromes promote seedling light responses by inhibiting four negatively-acting phytochrome-interacting factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(18):7660.
Shen H, et al. Light-induced phosphorylation and degradation of the negative regulator PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR1 from Arabidopsis depend upon its direct physical interactions with photoactivated phytochromes. Plant Cell. 2008;20(6):1586–602.
Toledo-Ortiz G, Huq E, Rodríguez-Concepción M. Direct regulation of phytoene synthase gene expression and carotenoid biosynthesis by phytochrome-interacting factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(25):11626.
Zhu L, et al. CUL4 forms an E3 ligase with COP1 and SPA to promote light-induced degradation of PIF1. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):7245.
Alvarez J, Smyth DR. CRABS CLAW and SPATULA, two Arabidopsis genes that control carpel development in parallel with AGAMOUS. Development. 1999;126(11):2377–86.
Tsiantis M. Plant development: multiple strategies for breaking seed dormancy. Curr Biol. 2006;16(1):R25–7.
Josse E-M, et al. A DELLA in disguise: SPATULA restrains the growth of the developing arabidopsis seedling. Plant Cell. 2011;23(4):1337–51.
Penfield S, et al. Cold and light control seed germination through the bHLH transcription factor SPATULA. Curr Biol. 2005;15(22):1998–2006.
Vaistij FE, et al. MOTHER-OF-FT-AND-TFL represses seed germination under far-red light by modulating phytohormone responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(33):8442.
Eriksson EM, et al. Effect of the colorless non-ripening mutation on cell wall biochemistry and gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening. Plant Physiol. 2004;136(4):4184–97.
Wang J-W, Czech B, Weigel D. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. 2009;138(4):738–49.
Gandikota M, et al. The miRNA156/157 recognition element in the 3′ UTR of the Arabidopsis SBP box gene SPL3 prevents early flowering by translational inhibition in seedlings. Plant J. 2007;49(4):683–93.
Wei S, et al. Enhanced seed carotenoid levels and branching in transgenic Brassica napus expressing the Arabidopsis miR156b gene. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(17):9572–8.
Stanley L, Yuan Y-W. Transcriptional regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants: so many regulators, so little consensus. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1017.
Fujisawa M, Nakano T, Ito Y. Identification of potential target genes for the tomato fruit-ripening regulator RIN by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11(1):26.
Fujisawa M, et al. A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Cell. 2013;25(2):371–86.
Giménez E, et al. Functional analysis of the Arlequin mutant corroborates the essential role of the Arlequin/TAGL1 gene during reproductive development of tomato. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14427.
Itkin M, et al. TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 is a component of the fruit ripening regulatory network. Plant J. 2009;60(6):1081–95.
Martel C, et al. The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(3):1568–79.
Shima Y, et al. Tomato FRUITFULL homologues act in fruit ripening via forming MADS-box transcription factor complexes with RIN. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;82(4):427–38.