Comparative ecophysiology of two representativeQuercus species appearing in different stages of succession

Ecological Research - Tập 1 - Trang 129-140 - 1986
Akio Takenaka1
1Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Tóm tắt

Ecophysiological comparisons were made of the growth and photosynthetic characteristics between seedlings of deciduousQuercus serrata and evergreenQuercus myrsinaefolia. Q. myrsinaefolia seedlings naturally occurring in secondary coppice forests showed exponential-like growth in height with age, while sympatricQ. serrata seedlings were considerably smaller in height, their growth being limited by shortage of light. The photosynthetic characteristics measured under laboratory conditions showed no bases for the differences in growth between the two species on the forest floor: Light compensation points of the seedlings raised under 5% daylight were almost identical for the two species, being about 6.0 μE·m−2·s−1. Growth analysis of seedlings planted in a coppice forest showed that bothQ. serrata andQ. myrsinaefolia could hardly grow during the summer under the shrub layer, when relative photon flux density (RPFD) was 0.9±0.5%. In the winter, when RPFD under the leafless canopy increased to 29.3±2.7%, the dry matter production of the evergreen seedlings ofQ. myrsinaefolia was much improved. Current-year seedlings of the species showed NAR of 0.102±0.021 g·dm−2·mo−1 during the winter. Temperature dependency of photosynthesis and increment of leaf temperature by direct solar beam also indicated active photosynthesis ofQ. myrsinaefolia on the forest floor during the winter.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bazzaz, F. A. (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.10: 351–371. — &Pickett, S. T. A. (1980) Physiological ecology of tropical succession: A comparative review. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.11: 287–310. Bourdeau, P. E. &Laverick, M. L. (1958) Tolerance and photosynthetic adaptability to light intensity in white pine, red pine, hemlock and ailanthus seedlings. For. Sci.4: 196–207. Boysen Jensen, P. (1932) Die Stoffproduktion der Pflanzen. 108 pp. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena. Chabot, B. F. &Hicks, D. J. (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.,13: 229–259. Clements, F. E. (1928) Plant succession and indicators. 453 pp. Hafner Press, New York. Grime, J. P. (1965) Shade tolerance in flowering plants. Nature208: 161–163. Hutchinson, T. C. (1967) Comparative studies of the ability of species to withstand prolonged periods of darkness. J. Ecol.55: 291–299. Forcier, L. K. (1975) Reproductive strategies and the cooccurrence of climax tree species. Science198: 808–809. Kimura, M., Funakoshi, M., Sudo, S., Masuzawa, T., Nakamura, T. &Matsuda, K. (1982) Productivity and mineral cycling in an oak coppice forest. 1. Structure and phytomass of the forest. Bot. Mag. Tokyo95: 19–33. Kimura, M., Ohya, M. & Tanaka, E. (1972) Production processes ofOphiopogon planiscapus population grown in a mixed forest stand. JIBP/PP-Photosynthesis level III report 1971: 76–79. Kramer, P. J. &Decker, J. P. (1944) Relation between light intensity and rate of photosynthesis of loblolly pine and certain hardwoods. Plant Physiol.19: 350–358. — &Kozlowski, T. T. (1979) Physiology of woody plants. 811 pp. Academic Press, New York-London. Lassoie, J. P., Dougherty, P. M., Reich, P. B., Hinckley, T. M., Metcalf, C. M. &Dina, S. J. (1983) Ecophysiological investigations of understory eastern redceder in central Missouri. Ecology64: 1355–1366. Loach, K. (1967) Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. I. Leaf photosynthesis and respiration in plants raised under artificial shade. New Phytol.66: 607–621. Matsuda, K. (1982) Studies on the early phase of the regeneration of a Konara oak (Quercus serrata Thunb.) secondary forest. I. Development and premature abscissions of Konara oak acorns. Jap. J. Ecol.32: 293–302. Okutomi, K. (1979) Vegetation of Tokyo and its conservation and management. Bull. Yokohama Phytosociol. Soc.16: 145–160. Okutomi, K. & Tsuji, S. (1978) Potential natural-vegetation of Tama district, Tokyo. “Papers on plant ecology to the memory of Dr.Kuniji Yoshioka” 150–176. Sendai, Japan (In Japanese). —— &Kodaira, T. (1976) Secondary forest vegetation of southern Kanto, central Japan. Bull. Exp. For. Tokyo Univ. Agr. Technol.13: 55–66 (In Japanese with English summary). Ormsbee, P., Bazzaz, F. A. &Boggess, W. R. (1976) Physiological ecology ofJuniperus virginiana in oldfields. Oecologia23: 75–82. Schaedle, M. (1975) Tree photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.26: 101–115. Schulze, E. D. (1982) Plant life forms and their carbon, water and nutrient relations “Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New Ser 12B, Physiological plant ecology II”, 615–676. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York. Vaatraja, O. (1962) The relationship of fungi to survival of shaded tree seedlings. Ecology43: 547–549. Woods, K. D. (1979) Reciprocal replacement and the maintenance of codominance in a beech-maple forest. Oikos33: 31–39.