Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics - Tập 86 Số 7 - Trang 697-706 - 2018
L. Mitchell1, Lucy J. Colwell1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

AbstractNanobodies are a class of antigen‐binding protein derived from camelids that achieve comparable binding affinities and specificities to classical antibodies, despite comprising only a single 15 kDa variable domain. Their reduced size makes them an exciting target molecule with which we can explore the molecular code that underpins binding specificity—how is such high specificity achieved? Here, we use a novel dataset of 90 nonredundant, protein‐binding nanobodies with antigen‐bound crystal structures to address this question. To provide a baseline for comparison we construct an analogous set of classical antibodies, allowing us to probe how nanobodies achieve high specificity binding with a dramatically reduced sequence space. Our analysis reveals that nanobodies do not diversify their framework region to compensate for the loss of the VL domain. In addition to the previously reported increase in H3 loop length, we find that nanobodies create diversity by drawing their paratope regions from a significantly larger set of aligned sequence positions, and by exhibiting greater structural variation in their H1 and H2 loops.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.dci.2005.06.006

10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01790-X

10.1038/nbt.2782

ApostoaeiAI TrabalkaJR.Review Synthesis and Application of Information on the Human Lymphatic System to Radiation Dosimetry for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. SENES Oak Ridge Oak Ridge Tennessee March. [SRDB Ref ID: 119510];2012.

10.1038/nbt1336

10.1073/pnas.1401131111

10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449

10.3389/fimmu.2017.01589

10.1016/j.sbi.2015.01.001

10.1093/emboj/19.5.921

10.1038/nature18636

10.1016/j.sbi.2011.06.011

10.1093/protein/gzt020

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002388

10.3389/fimmu.2013.00302

10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.07.006

10.1093/nar/gkt1043

10.1021/jp3075496

10.4049/jimmunol.1100116

10.1002/prot.22319

10.1093/nar/28.1.235

10.1093/bioinformatics/btw197

Dunbar J, 2015, ANARCI: antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification, Bioinformatics., 32, 298, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552

10.1006/jmbi.2001.4662

10.1101/gr.849004

Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) 2015.1001. Montreal: Chemical Computing Group Inc.;2017.

10.1107/S0567739478001680

10.1016/j.molimm.2012.06.001

10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.12.007

Li X, 2016, Comparative analysis of immune repertoires between Bactrian Camel's conventional and heavy‐chain antibodies, PLoS One., 49, 1

10.1073/pnas.1001705107

10.1016/j.sbi.2015.06.002

10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.019

10.1016/j.dci.2005.06.010

10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00138-6

10.1038/342877a0

10.1006/jmbi.2000.3839

10.1002/prot.10096

Marks C, 2017, Sphinx: merging knowledge‐based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction, Bioinformatics (Oxford, Engl)., 33, 1346

10.1371/journal.pbio.1001120