Community perspectives on the extent to which transactional sex is viewed as sexual exploitation in Central Uganda

BMC International Health and Human Rights - Tập 20 - Trang 1-16 - 2020
N. Kyegombe1, R. Meiksin2, S. Namakula3, J. Mulindwa3, R. Muhumuza4, J. Wamoyi5, L. Heise6, A. M. Buller1
1Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
3Independent researcher, Kampala, Uganda
4MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
5Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania
6Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and JHU School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA

Tóm tắt

Definitions of child sexual exploitation vary. Sexual exploitation violates children’s rights and exposes them to mental and physical harm. There exist differences in views of behaviour that is considered exploitative, including transactional sex. This paper explores community perspectives on the extent to which transactional sex is considered exploitative. In 2014, we conducted 19 focus group discussions and 44 in-depth interviews with young people and adults in two communities in Uganda. Participants were presented with vignettes describing sexual encounters between adolescent girls and young women and men to explore under what conditions participants considered the scenario to be exploitative and why. Interviews were conducted in Luganda using a semi-structured tool, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was thematic and complemented by constant comparison and deviant case analysis techniques. Definitions by multilateral, bilateral, and non-governmental organisations of the sexual exploitation of children shared similarities with community conceptualisations of wrong or unfair sex. Although in community conceptualisations there was no consensus on what constituted sexual exploitation, transactional sex was condemned to the extent to which it involved sex with a minor or misled a naïve or immature girl; involved lack of consent, particularly in relationships characterised by power differentials; or worsened the pre-existing status of the girl. Also relevant was the extent to which a man’s intentions were considered inappropriate; the adolescent girl or young woman was considered vulnerable; and the adolescent girl or young woman was considered responsible for ‘her situation’. Existing social norms that condemn sex with a minor or sex that involves deception, sexual coercion or misleading an immature girl, present opportunities to mobilise communities to protect adolescent girls and young women at risk. Any intervention must, however, be designed with full cognisance of the social and structural drivers that underlie transactional sex and limit adolescent girls’ and young women’s opportunities to provide for themselves without recourse to sexual relationships with men. Interventions must also be designed to recognise that girls in transactional sex relationships may not consider themselves as exploited, thus requiring engagement with them based on their own concerns, aspirations, and expectations.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sommarin C. Overview of sexual exploitation: definitions, types and evidence. New York: UNICEF; 2014. Butchart A, Harvey AP, Mian M, Furniss T. Preventing child maltreatment: a guide to taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: WHO; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/violence/child_maltreatment/en/. Melrose M, Pearce J. Critical perspectives on child exploitation and related trafficking. 1 ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Council of Europe. Council of Europe Convention on the protection of children against sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. France: Council of Europe; 2007. Barnardo's. Child Sexual Exploitation Essex: Barnardo's; 2017 [Available from: http://www.barnardos.org.uk/what_we_do/our_work/sexual_exploitation/about-cse. Accessed 22 Mar 2020. Sample RJ. Exploitation: what it is and why It's wrong. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield; 2003. Waldman M. A theory of wrongful exploitation. Philosophers' Imprint. 2009;9(6):1–14. Fetterman DM. Ethnography in applied social research. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. Hunter M. The political economy of concurrent partners: toward a history of sex–love–gift connections in the time of AIDS. Rev Afr Polit Econ. 2015;42(145):362–75. Leclerc-Madlala S. Transactional sex and the pursuit of modernity. Soc Dyn. 2003;29(2):213–33. Hunter M. The materiality of everyday sex: thinking beyond 'prostitution'. Afr Stud. 2002;61(1):99–120. Mojola SA. Love, money and HIV: becoming a modern African woman in the age of AIDS. California: University of California Press; 2014. Ankomah A. Premarital sexual relationships in Ghana in the era of AIDS. Health Policy Plan. 1992;7(2):135–43. Standing H. AIDS: conceptual and methodological issues in researching sexual behaviour in sub-Saharan Africa. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(5):475–83. Stoebenau K, Heise L, Wamoyi J, Bobrova N. Revisiting the understanding of 'transactional sex' in sub-Saharan Africa: a review and syntheis of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2016;168:186–97. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Transactional sex among women in Soweto, South Africa: prevalence, risk factors and association with HIV infection. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(8):1581–92. Fielding-Miller R, Dunkle KL, Jama-Shai N, Windle M, Hadley C, Cooper HLF. The feminine ideal and transactional sex: navigating respectability and risk in Swaziland. Soc Sci Med. 2016;158:24–33. Hawkins K, Price N, Mussá F. Milking the cow: young women's construction of identity and risk in age-disparate transactional sexual relationships in Maputo. Mozambique Global Public Health. 2009;4(2):169–82. Luke N, Goldberg RE, Mberu BU, Zulu EM. Social exchange and sexual behavior in young Women's premarital relationships in Kenya. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73(5):1048–64. Ranganathan M, Heise L, Pettifor A, et al. Transactional sex among young women in rural South Africa: prevalence, mediators and association with HIV infection. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20749. Published 2016 Jul 27. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.20749. Bantebya G, Ochen E, Pereznieto P, Walker D. Cross-generational and transactional sexual relations in Uganda: income poverty as a risk factor for adolescents. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2014. Choudhry V, Ambresin A-E, Nyakato VN, Agardh A. Transactional sex and HIV risks - evidence from a cross-sectional national survey among young people in Uganda. 2015;2015:8. Choudhry V, Östergren P-O, Ambresin A-E, Kyagaba E, Agardh A. Giving or receiving something for sex: a cross-sectional study of transactional sex among Ugandan University students. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112431. Nyanzi S, Pool R, Kinsman J. The negotiation of sexual relationships among school pupils in South-Western Uganda. AIDS Care. 2001;13(1):83–98. Hulton LA, Cullen R, Khalokho SW. Perceptions of the risk of sexual activity and their consquences among Ugandan adolescents. Stud Fam Plann. 2000;31:35–46. Bohmer L, Kirumbira E. Socio-economic context and the sexual behaviour of Ugandan out of school youth. Cult Health Sex. 2000;2(3):269–85. Bell SA. Young people and sexual agency in rural Uganda. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(3):283–96. Bell SA, Aggleton P. Economic vulnerability and young people's sexual relationships in rural Uganda. J Youth Stud. 2014;17(6):814–28. UNAIDS. Adolescent girls and young women. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2014. Dellar RC, Dlamini S, Karim QA. Adolescent girls and young women: key populations for HIV epidemic control. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(2 Suppl 1):19408. Published 2015 Feb 26. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.2.19408. Pettifor AE, Rees HV, Kleinschmidt I, Steffenson AE, MacPhail C, Hlongwa-Madikizela L, et al. Young people's sexual health in South Africa: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviours from a nationally representative household survey. AIDS. 2005;19(14):1525–34. Rositch AF, Cherutich P, Brentlinger P, Kiarie JNM, Nduati R, Farquhar C. HIV infection and sexual partnerships and behaviour among adolescent girls in Nairobi, Kenya. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23(7):468–74. Wamoyi J, Stobeanau K, Bobrova N, Abramsky T, Watts C. Transactional sex and risk for HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20992. Published 2016 Nov 2. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.20992. Jewkes R, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai NJ. Transactional sex and HIV incidence in a cohort of young women in the Stepping Stones trial. J AIDS Clinic Res. 2012;3(5). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.100015. Wamoyi J, Fenwick A, Urassa M, Zaba B, Stones W. “Women’s bodies are shops”: beliefs about transactional sex and implications for understanding gender power and HIV prevention in Tanzania. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(1):5–15. Maganja RK, Maman S, Groves A, Mbwambo JK. Skinning the goat and pulling the load: transactional sex among youth in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS Care. 2007;19(8):974–81. Groes-Green C. “To put men in a bottle”: eroticism, kinship, female power, and transactional sex in Maputo, Mozambique. Am Ethnol. 2013;40(1):102–17. Nagoshi CT, Nagoshi JL. Feminist theoretical framework 2017 2020/02/18. In: The SAGE encyclopedia of abnormal and clinical psychology [internet]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-abnormal-and-clinical-psychology. Accessed 22 Mar 2020. Barnes M. Research in midwifery — the relevance of a feminist theoretical framework. Aust Coll Midwives Inc J. 1999;12(2):6–10. Ssetuba I. The hold of patriarchy: An appraisal of Ganda proverbs in modern gender relations. In: Gender, Literature and Religion in Africa. Dakar: CODERISA; 2005. p. 37–48. Jakobsen H. The good beating: social norms supporting men's partner violence in Tanzania. Dakar: University of Bergen; 2015. Hughes R, Huby M. The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Soc Work Soc Sci Rev. 2012;11(1):36–51. World Health Organization. Putting women first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001. Graham A, Powell M, Taylor N, Anderson D, Fitzgerald R. Ethical research involving children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti; 2013. Berger PL, Luckman T. The social construction of reality. Garden City: Doubleday; 1966. Teater B. Social work theory. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 813–20. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967. McLellan E, MacQueen KM, Neidig JL. Beyond the qualitative interview: data preparation and transcription. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):63–84. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2012;Version 10. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for Health Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2004. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis: the call for transparency. Build Res Capacity. 2004;7:2–4. Luke N, Kurz KM. Cross-generational and transactional sexual relationships in sub-saharan Africa: prevalence of behaviour and implications for negotiating safer sexual practices. Washington: ICRW and PSI; 2002. Wamoyi J, Heise L, Meiksin R, Kyegombe N, Nyato D, Buller AM. Is transactional sex exploitative? A social norms perspective, with implications for interventions with adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214366. Wamoyi J, Buller AM, Nyato D, Kyegombe N, Meiksin R, Heise L. "Eat and you will be eaten" A qualitative study on motivations and perceptions of exploitation for intergenerational transactional sex: implications for girls' sexual and reproductive health interventions. Reproductive Health. 2018;15(1). Wamoyi J, Wight D, Plummer M, Mshana G, Ross D. Transactional sex amongst young people in rural northern Tanzania: an ethnography of young women's motivations and negotiation. Reprod Health. 2010;7(1):2. Pulerwitz J, Blum RW, Cislaghi B, Costenbader E, Harper C, Heise L et al. Proposing a conceptual framework to address social norms that influence adolescent sexual and reproductive health. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(4):S7–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.014. Cislaghi B, Manji K, Heise L. Social norms and gender-related harmful practices: what assistance from the theory to the practice? 2017. Fielding-Miller R, Dunkle K. Constrained relationship agency as the risk factor for intimate partner violence in different models of transactional sex. Afr J AIDS Res. 2017;16(4):283–93. Kyegombe N, Meiksin R, Wamoyi J, Heise L, Stoebenau K, Buller AM. Sexual health of adolescent girls and young women in Central Uganda: exploring perceived coercive aspects of transactional sex. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):1700770. International Labour Office. The demand side of the commercial sexual exploitation of adolescents: qualitative study in South America (Chile, Colombia, Paraguay and Peru): International Labour Office; 2007. International Labour Office. The commercial sexual exploitation of children and adolescents in Belize. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2006. Anderson PM, Coyle KK, Johnson A, Denner J. An exploratory study of adolescent pimping relationships. J Prim Prev. 2014;35(2):113–7. Buller AM, Schulte MC. Aligning human rights and social norms for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(52):38–45.