Community assessment of agroforestry opportunities in GaMothiba, South Africa
Tóm tắt
Evaluating environmentally sustainable and culturally sensitive approaches to natural resource management issues is a necessary step towards improving livelihoods in rural South Africa. This study assessed the applicability of various agroforestry practices to natural resource management issues in the village of GaMothiba located in the northwestern region of South Africa. Agroforestry assessments were carried out using a community based approach through the application of participatory rural appraisal (PRA) methods. These methods were selected in order to assess the acceptability of agroforestry practices according to the perspective of the local people. The assessment process culminated in a variety of community designed agroforestry interventions. The acceptability of agroforestry practices is largely influenced by the degree of community cohesion, land rights, and cooperation between traditional and municipal authority figures. Understanding the opportunities and constraints of agroforestry adoption in rural sub-Saharan Africa furthers the movement towards community based natural resource management and ultimately a more sustainable approach to rural development.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbalu G, Hassan R (1998) Agricultural productivity and natural resource use. South Africa Food Policy 23(6):477–490
Alieri M (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Colorado
Ayisi KK, Mkhari JJ, Mollell NM, Ramudzuli MR (1999) Indigenous agroforestry practices in South Africa. University of Limpopo, South Africa
Barret CB, Place F, Aboud AA (2002) Natural resource management. In: Africa agriculture: understanding and improving current practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
Botha J, Witkowski E, Cock J (2006) The South African experience of conservation and social outreach nurseries. Environ Manage 38:733–749
Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Bath Press, Bath
Cleaver F (2001) Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In: Cooke B, Kathari U (eds) Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books, London
Colfer C (2005) The equitable forest: diversity, community, and resource management. Resources for the Future, USA
Collier P (2007) The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, NY
Cousins B (ed) (2000) At the crossroads: land and agrarian reform in South Africa into the 21st Century. PLAAS, Cape Town
Darkoh MBK (2002) Regional perspectives on agriculture and biodiversity. The drylands of Africa. J Arid Environ 54:261–279
Dipholo K (2002) Trends in participatory development. J Soc Dev Africa 17(1):59–79
Esterhuyse CJ (1994) Agroforestry. In: van der Sijde HANB (ed) Forestry handbook. South African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria
Fabrcius C, Koch E (eds) (2004) Rights, resources and rural development: community-based natural resource management in Southern Africa. Earthscan, London
FAO (2006) Global forest resources assessment 2005. Forestry paper 147. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, UNFAO, Rome
Jackson WJ, Ingles AW (1998) Participatory techniques for community forestry: a field manual. SADAG-01200, Bellegarde
Jama B, Njui A, Njenga K (2003) Management and utilization of dryland forests in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of agroforestry. VITRI/ETFN/IUFRO-SPDC Workshop Trees, Agroforestry and Climate Change in Dryland Africa, Finland 29 June–4 July 2003
James D (2007) Gaining ground? Rights and property in South African Land Reform. Routledge-Cavendish, NY
Kumar S (2002) Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. ITDG Publishing, Southhampton Row
Kwesiga F, Akinnfesi F, Mafongoya P, McDermott M, Agumya A (2003) Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: review and challenges ahead. Agroforest Syst 59:173–186
McCusker B (2004) Land use and cover change as an indicator of transformation on recently redistributed farms in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Hum Ecol 32(1):49–75
Nair PKR (1989) ICRAF’s agroforestry systems inventory project. In: Nair PKR (ed) Agroforestry systems in the tropics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Ngcobo N (2002) State of forest and tree genetic resources in South Africa. Prepared for the SADC regional workshop on forest and tree genetic resources, 5–9 June 2000, Arusha, Tanzania. Forest genetic resources working papers, Working Paper FGR/28E. Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division, FAO, Rome
Ostrom E (1992) Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco
Percy R (1999) The experiential learning cycle and its application towards the transformation of governmental extension services in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Lifelong Educ 18(5):370–384
Rocheleau D, Weber F, Field-Juma A (1988) Agroforestry in dryland Africa. English Press, Nairobi
Sanders D (1991) People’s participation in soil conservation: Lesotho. In: Oakley Peter et al (eds) Projects with people: the practice of participation in rural development. International Labour Office, Geneva
Sinclair FL (1999) A general classification of agroforestry practice. Agroforest Syst 46:161–180
Sturmheit P (1990) Agroforestry and soil conservation needs of smallholders in Southern Zambia. Agroforest Syst 10:265–289
Thirtle C, Van Zyl J, Vink N (2000) South African agriculture at the crossroads. St. Martins Press, NY
Van Zyl J, Kirsten J, Bingswanger H (1996) Agricultural land reform in south South Africa: policies, markets and institutions. Oxford University press, NY
Waisbord S (2001) Family tree of theories, methodologies and strategies in development communication. Communication for Social Change, New Jersey
World Bank (2007) World development report 2008: agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington DC