Commentary on new metrics, measures, and uses for fluency data

Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from tri-annual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109–125. Ardoin, S. P., Christ, T. J., Morena, L. S., Cormier, D. C., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2013a). A systematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.004. Ardoin, S. P., Eckert, T. L., Christ, T. J., White, M. J., Morena, L. S., January, S.-A. A., et al. (2013b). Examining variance in reading comprehension among developing readers: Words in context (curriculum-based measurement in reading) versus words out of context (word lists). School Psychology Review, 42(3), 243–261. Ardoin, S. P., Morena, L. S., Binder, K. S., & Foster, T. E. (2013c). Examining the impact of feedback and repeated readings on oral reading fluency: Let’s not forget prosody. School Psychology Quarterly. doi:10.1037/spq0000027. Baker, D. L. S., Biancarosa, G., Park, B., J., Bousselot, T., Smith. J.-L., Baker, S. K., et al. (2014). Validity of CBM measures of oral reading and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in grades 7 and 8. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4. Ball, C. R., & Christ, T. J. (2012). Supporting valid decision making: Uses and misuses of assessment data within the context of RTI. Psychology in The Schools, 49(3), 231–244. doi:10.1002/pits.21592. Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Test complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 388–404. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.2. Christ, T. J., & Ardoin, S. P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55–75. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.004. Christ, T. J., Silberglitt, B., Yeo, S., & Cormier, D. (2010). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: An evaluation of growth rates and seasonal effects among students served in general and special education. School Psychology Review, 39(3), 447–462. Christ, T. J., Zopluoglu, C., Monaghen, B. D., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 19–57. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.11.001. Cummings, K. D., Stoolmiller, M. L., Baker, S. K., Fien, H., & Eame’enui, E. J. (2014). Using school-level student achievement to engage in formative evaluation: Comparative school-level rates of oral reading fluency growth conditioned by initial skill for second grade students. Reading and Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9512-5. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. I. (1982). Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 6–25. Good, R. H., I. I. I., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. Hosp, M. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Using CBM as an indicator of decoding, word reading, and comprehension: Do the relations change with grade? School Psychology Review, 34, 9–26. Kim, Y.-S., Petscher, Y., & Foorman, B. (2013). The unique relations of silent reading fluency to end-of-year reading comprehension: Understanding individual differences at the student, classroom, school, and district levels. Reading and Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9455-2 Marston, D., Mirkin, P. K., & Deno, S. L. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification. Journal of Special Education, 18, 109–117. Meisinger, E. B., Bradley, B. A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Kuhn, M. R., & Morris, R. D. (2009). Myth and reality of the word caller: The relation between teacher nominations and prevalence among elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(3), 147–159. doi:10.1037/a0017191. Mellard, D. F., McKnight, M., & Woods, K. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress monitoring practices in 41 local school. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 186–195. Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–853. Petscher, Y., & Mitchell, A. M. (2013). Improving the precision of student scores from assessments by using response times: An illustration of conditional item response theory. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Reschly, A. L., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Westmoreland, M. R., & Benjamin, R. G. (2013). Reading fluency skill and the prosodic marking of linguistic focus. Reading and Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9456-1 Shinn, M. R., & Marston, D. (1985). Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 6(2), 31–38. Tindal, G. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement: A brief history of nearly everything from the 1970s to the present. ISRN Education, 2013, 1–29. doi:10.1155/2013/958530. Valle, A., Binder, K. S., Walsh, C. B., Nemier, C., & Bangs, K. E. (2013). Eye movements, prosody, and word frequency among average- and high-skilled second-grade readers. School Psychology Review, 42, 171–190.