Combined Use of Airborne Lidar and DBInSAR Data to Estimate LAI in Temperate Mixed Forests

Remote Sensing - Tập 4 Số 6 - Trang 1758-1780
Alicia Peduzzi1, Randolph H. Wynne1, Valerie A. Thomas1, Ross Nelson2, James J. Reis3, Mark Sanford4
1Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 319 Cheatham Hall (Mail Code 0324), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2NASA/GSFC, Mail Code 618, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
3IEEE, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
4Fugro EarthData Inc., 7320 Executive Way, Frederick, MD 21704, USA

Tóm tắt

The objective of this study was to determine whether leaf area index (LAI) in temperate mixed forests is best estimated using multiple-return airborne laser scanning (lidar) data or dual-band, single-pass interferometric synthetic aperture radar data (from GeoSAR) alone, or both in combination. In situ measurements of LAI were made using the LiCor LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer on 61 plots (21 hardwood, 36 pine, 4 mixed pine hardwood; stand age ranging from 12-164 years; mean height ranging from 0.4 to 41.2 m) in the Appomattox-Buckingham State Forest, Virginia, USA. Lidar distributional metrics were calculated for all returns and for ten one meter deep crown density slices (a new metric), five above and five below the mode of the vegetation returns for each plot. GeoSAR metrics were calculated from the X-band backscatter coefficients (four looks) as well as both X- and P-band interferometric heights and magnitudes for each plot. Lidar metrics alone explained 69% of the variability in LAI, while GeoSAR metrics alone explained 52%. However, combining the lidar and GeoSAR metrics increased the R2 to 0.77 with a CV-RMSE of 0.42. This study indicates the clear potential for X-band backscatter and interferometric height (both now available from spaceborne sensors), when combined with small-footprint lidar data, to improve LAI estimation in temperate mixed forests.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Watson, D.J. (1947). Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Ann. Bot, 41–76.

Spanner, 1990, The seasonality of AVHRR data of temperate coniferous forests: Relationship with leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ, 33, 97, 10.1016/0034-4257(90)90036-L

Turner, 1999, Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites, Remote Sens. Environ, 70, 52, 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00057-7

Anderson, 2004, Upscaling ground observations of vegetation water content, canopy height, and leaf area index during SMEX02 using aircraft and Landsat imagery, Remote Sens. Environ, 92, 447, 10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.019

Vose, 1995, Vertical leaf area distribution, light transmittance, and application of the Beer-Lambert law in four mature hardwood stands in the southern Appalachians, Can. J. For. Res, 25, 1036, 10.1139/x95-113

Sampson, D.A., Vose, J.M., and Allen, H.L. (1997, January 25–27). A Conceptual Approach to Stand Management Using Leaf Area Index as the Integral of Site Structure, Physiological Function, and Resource Supply. Clemson, SC, USA.

Barilotti, A., Turco, S., and Alberti, G (2006, January 14–15). LAI Determination in Forestry Ecosystem by Lidar Data Analysis. Vienna, Austria.

Kwak, D.-A., Lee, W.-K., and Cho, H.-K. Estimation of LAI Using Lidar Remote Sensing in Forest. Espoo, Finland.

Sasaki, 2008, Estimation of leaf area index and canopy openness in broad leaved forest using an airborne laser scanner in comparison with high-resolution near-infrared digital photography, Landscape Ecol. Eng, 4, 47, 10.1007/s11355-008-0041-8

Solberg, 2009, Mapping LAI in a Norway spruce forest using airborne laser scanning, Remote Sens. Environ, 113, 2317, 10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.010

Hopkinson, 2009, Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones, Remote Sens. Environ, 113, 275, 10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.012

Zhao, 2009, Lidar-based mapping of leaf area index and its use for validating GLOBCARBON satellite LAI product in a temperate forest of the southern USA, Remote Sens. Environ, 113, 1628, 10.1016/j.rse.2009.03.006

Richardson, 2009, Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR, Agr. For. Meteorol, 149, 1152, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.007

Jensen, 2008, Discrete return lidar-based prediction of leaf area index in two conifer forests, Remote Sens. Environ, 112, 3947, 10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.001

Solberg, 2010, Mapping gap fraction, LAI and defoliation using various ALS penetration variables, Int. J. Remote Sens, 31, 1227, 10.1080/01431160903380672

Valladares, 2004, Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (lidar) in two contrasting forests, Agr. For. Meteorol, 124, 269, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.02.005

Korhonen, 2011, Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ, 115, 1065, 10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.011

Thomas, 2011, Leaf area and clumping indices for a boreal mixed-wood forest: lidar, hyperspectral, and Landsat models, Int. J. Remote Sens, 32, 8271, 10.1080/01431161.2010.533211

Cerrillo, 2010, LIDAR-based estimation of leaf area index on Holm oak Quercus ilex L. subsp ballota (Desf.) Samp. trees, For. Syst, 19, 61, 10.5424/fs/2010191-01167

Williams, M.L., Milne, T., Tapley, I., Reis, J.J., Sanford, M., Kofman, B., and Hensley, S (2009, January 12–17). Tropical Forest Biomass Recovery Using GeoSAR Observations.. Capte Town, South Africa.

Sexton, 2009, A comparison of lidar, radar, and field measurements of canopy height in pine and hardwood forests of southeastern North America, For. Ecol. Manage, 257, 1136, 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.022

Williams, M.L., Silman, M., Saatchi, S., Hensley, S., Sanford, M., Yohannan, A., Kofman, B., Reis, J., and Kampes, B (2010, January 25–30). Analysis of GeoSAR Dual-Band InSAR Data for Peruvian Forest. Honolulu, HI, USA.

Carson, 2008, Topographic mapping in the equatorial belt using dual-frequency airborne IFSAR (GeoSAR). Photogramm., Eng Reote Sensing, 74, 939

Williams, 2009, GeoSAR and DBInSAR: Combining “X” With “P” for Tropical Forest “C”. Photogramm. Eng., Reote Sensing, 75, 738

Svoray, 2001, Relationship between green leaf biomass volumetric density and ERS-2 SAR backscatter of four vegetation formations in the semi-arid zone of Israel, Int. J. Remote Sens, 22, 1601, 10.1080/01431160116869

Sun, 2011, Forest biomass mapping from lidar and radar synergies, Remote Sens. Environ, 115, 2906, 10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.021

Solberg, 2010, Simulating X-Band Interferometric Height in a Spruce Forest From Airborne Laser Scanning, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, 48, 3369, 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2046493

Durden, 1995, Microwave backscatter and attenuation dependence on leaf area index for flooded rice fields, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, 33, 807, 10.1109/36.387599

Paloscia, 1998, An empirical approach to estimating leaf area index from multifrequency SAR data, Int. J. Remote Sens, 19, 361, 10.1080/014311698216323

Manninen, 2005, Leaf area index estimation of boreal forest using ENVISAT ASAR, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, 43, 2627, 10.1109/TGRS.2005.857325

Jenkins, 2003, National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species, For. Sci, 49, 12

Means, 1999, Use of large-footprint scanning airborne lidar to estimate forest stand characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon, Remote Sens. Environ, 67, 298, 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00091-1

Wynne, 2006, Forest volume and biomass estimation using small-footprint lidar-distributional parameters on a per-segment basis, For. Sci, 52, 636

Popescu, 2002, Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar: Local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size, Comput. Electron. Agr, 37, 71, 10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00121-7

(2010). FV2000 the LAI-2000 Data File Viewer, LI-COR Biosciences.

Welles, 1991, Instrument for indirect measurement of canopy architecture, Agron. J, 83, 818, 10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050009x

Holmgren, 2004, Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning, Scand. J. Forest Res, 19, 543, 10.1080/02827580410019472

Barilotti, A., Turco, S., Napolitano, R., and Bressan, E (2005, January 12–14). La Tecnologia LiDAR per lo Studio Della Biomassa Negli Ecosistemi Forestali. Torino, Italy.

2002, Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data, Remote Sens. Environ, 80, 88, 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5

(2010). The SAS System for Windows Release 9.1.3, SAS Institute Inc.

Hocking, 1976, The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression, Biometrics, 32, 1, 10.2307/2529336

Akaike, 1969, Fitting autoregressive models for prediction, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math, 21, 243, 10.1007/BF02532251

Schwarz, 1978, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Stat, 6, 461, 10.1214/aos/1176344136

Belsley, 1984, Demeaning conditioning diagnostics through centering (with discussion), Amer. Statistician, 38, 73, 10.1080/00031305.1984.10483169

Marquart, 1980, Comment: you should standarize the predictor variables in your regression models, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc, 75, 87, 10.1080/01621459.1980.10477430

Rawlings, J.O., Pantula, S.G., and Dickey, D.A. (2001). Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool, Springer. [2nd ed.].

Allen, D The Prediction Sum of Squares as a Criterion for Selection of Predictor Variables, Tech. Report 23.

Solberg, 2006, Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning, Remote Sens. Environ, 102, 364, 10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.001

Nasahara, 2008, Vertical integration of leaf area index in a Japanese deciduous broad-leaved forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol, 148, 1136, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.011

Gower, 1991, Rapid Estimation of Leaf Area Index in Conifer and Broad-Leaf Plantations, Ecology, 72, 1896, 10.2307/1940988

Sampson, 1995, Direct and indirect estimates of leaf-area index (LAI) for lodgepole and loblolly-pine stands, Trees-Struct. Funct, 9, 119, 10.1007/BF02418200