Những người không bị suy giảm nhận thức với gánh nặng Aβ thấp có hồ sơ sinh học chất lỏng não tủy khác biệt

Marta Milà‐Alomà1, Mahnaz Shekari2,1, Gemma Salvadó1, Juan Domingo Gispert1, Eider M. Arenaza‐Urquijo1, Grégory Operto1, Carles Falcón1, Natàlia Vilor‐Tejedor1, Oriol Grau‐Rivera1, Aleix Sala‐Vila1, Gonzalo Sánchez‐Benavides1, José María González‐de‐Echávarri1, Carolina Minguillón1, Karine Fauria1, Aida Niñerola‐Baizán3, Andrés Perissinotti3, Maryline Simon4, Gwendlyn Kollmorgen5, Henrik Zetterberg6, Kaj Blennow7,8, Marc Suárez‐Calvet9, José Luís Molinuevo10,11
1Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005, Barcelona, Spain.
2Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
4Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
5Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
6Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Molndal, Sweden
7Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
8Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
9Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005, Barcelona, Spain. [email protected].
10Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005, Barcelona, Spain. [email protected].
11Present address: H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark. [email protected].

Tóm tắt

Tóm tắt Đặt vấn đề Hiểu những thay đổi xảy ra trong giai đoạn chuyển tiếp giữa tình trạng không có và tình trạng có amyloid-β (Aβ) rõ ràng trong tiếp diễn của bệnh Alzheimer là rất quan trọng để phát triển các chiến lược điều trị và phòng ngừa. Mục tiêu của nghiên cứu này là kiểm tra xem liệu những người không bị suy giảm nhận thức với gánh nặng Aβ thấp có một hồ sơ dấu ấn sinh học chất lỏng não tủy (CSF), hình ảnh não cấu trúc và chức năng khác biệt hay không. Phương pháp Nghiên cứu cắt ngang với 318 cá nhân trung niên không bị suy giảm nhận thức từ nhóm ALFA+. Chúng tôi đã đo CSF Aβ42/40, tau phosphoryl hóa (p-tau), tau tổng (t-tau), neurofilament nhẹ (NfL), neurogranin, sTREM2, YKL40, GFAP, IL6, S100B, và α-synuclein. Các đối tượng cũng đã trải qua các đánh giá nhận thức, phân tích gen APOE, MRI cấu trúc, [18F]-FDG, và [18F]-flutemetamol PET. Để đảm bảo tính chính xác của kết quả, chúng tôi đã sử dụng ba định nghĩa về gánh nặng Aβ thấp: (1) CSF Aβ42/40 dương tính và < 30 Centiloids trong PET Aβ, (2) CSF Aβ42/40 dương tính và đọc hình ảnh Aβ PET âm tính, và (3) phạm vi 20–40 Centiloid trong PET Aβ. Chúng tôi đã kiểm tra sự khác biệt về CSF và dấu ấn sinh học hình ảnh não giữa nhóm gánh nặng thấp và nhóm Aβ âm tính tương ứng, đã điều chỉnh theo tuổi và giới. Kết quả Tỷ lệ và đặc điểm nhân khẩu học của nhóm gánh nặng thấp khác nhau giữa ba định nghĩa. CSF p-tau và t-tau tăng lên ở nhóm gánh nặng thấp so với Aβ âm tính trong tất cả các định nghĩa. CSF neurogranin tăng lên trong nhóm gánh nặng thấp theo định nghĩa 1 và 3, trong khi CSF NfL chỉ tăng lên trong nhóm gánh nặng thấp theo định nghĩa 1. Không có nhóm gánh nặng thấp nào cho thấy dấu hiệu teo hoặc chuyển hóa glucose giảm. Thay vào đó, chúng tôi phát hiện những tăng nhẹ về độ dày vỏ não và chuyển hóa trong định nghĩa 2. Kết luận Có những tác động sinh học có ý nghĩa về Aβ downstream ở những cá nhân có gánh nặng Aβ thấp, trong khi những thay đổi cấu trúc và chức năng vẫn còn tinh tế hoặc không có. Những phát hiện này ủng hộ việc xem xét những cá nhân có gánh nặng Aβ thấp cho các thử nghiệm lâm sàng. Đăng ký thử nghiệm NCT02485730

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Hampel H, Molinuevo JL, Blennow K, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(6):614–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0.

Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003.

Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Feldman HH, Frisoni GB, et al. A / T / N : An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology. 2016:1–10.

Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:535–62.

Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, Scheltens P, Aisen P, Andrieu S, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(3):292–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002.

Milà-Alomà M, Suárez-Calvet M, Molinuevo JL. Latest advances in cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019;12:175628641988881.

Bos I, Vos S, Verhey F, Scheltens P, Teunissen C, Engelborghs S, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration, synaptic integrity, and astroglial activation across the clinical Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(5):644–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.01.004.

Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Öhrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M, et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(7):673–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00070-3.

Fagan AM, Xiong C, Jasielec MS, Bateman RJ, Goate AM, Benzinger TLS, et al. Longitudinal change in CSF biomarkers in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:226ra30.

Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TLS, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795–804. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1202753.

Villeneuve S, Rabinovici GD, Cohn-Sheehy BI, Madison C, Ayakta N, Ghosh PM, et al. Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation. Brain. 2015;138(7):2020–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv112.

Bischof GN, Jacobs HIL. Subthreshold amyloid and its biological and clinical meaning. Neurology. 2019;93(2):72–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007747.

Leal SL, Lockhart SN, Maass A, Bell RK, Jagust WJ. Subthreshold amyloid predicts tau deposition in aging. J Neurosci. 2018;38(19):4482–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0485-18.2018.

Landau SM, Horng A, Jagust WJ. Memory decline accompanies subthreshold amyloid accumulation. Neurology. 2018;90(17):e1452–60. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005354.

Bischof GN, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Devous MD, Park DC. Amyloid deposition in younger adults is linked to episodic memory performance. Neurology. 2016;87:2562–6.

Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O, et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(4):357–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9.

Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Lesnick TG, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Vemuri P, et al. Brain β-amyloid load approaches a plateau. Neurology. 2013;80(10):890–6. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182840bbe.

Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Therneau TM, Lowe VJ, Knopman DS, et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:205–16.

Sutphen CL, McCue L, Herries EM, Xiong C, Ladenson JH, Holtzman DM, et al. Longitudinal decreases in multiple cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neuronal injury in symptomatic late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(7):869–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.012.

Molinuevo JL, Gramunt N, Gispert JD, Fauria K, Esteller M, Minguillon C, et al. The ALFA project: a research platform to identify early pathophysiological features of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;2:82–92.

Teunissen CE, Tumani H, Engelborghs S, Mollenhauer B. Biobanking of CSF: international standardization to optimize biomarker development. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:288–92.

Milà-Alomà M, Salvadó G, Gispert JD, Vilor-Tejedor N, Grau-Rivera O, Sala-Vila A, et al. Amyloid beta, tau, synaptic, neurodegeneration, and glial biomarkers in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer’s continuum. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(10):1358–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12131.

Lifke V, Kollmorgen G, Manuilova E, Oelschlaegel T, Hillringhaus L, Widmann M, et al. Elecsys® Total-Tau and Phospho-Tau (181P) CSF assays: analytical performance of the novel, fully automated immunoassays for quantification of tau proteins in human cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Biochem. 2019;72:30–8.

Bittner T, Zetterberg H, Teunissen CE, Ostlund RE, Militello M, Andreasson U, et al. Technical performance of a novel, fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitation of β-amyloid (1-42) in human cerebrospinal fluid. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:517–26.

Agency EM. ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vizamyl-epar-product-information_en.pdf

Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, Benzinger TL, Devous MD, Jagust WJ, et al. The Centiloid project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:1–15.e4.

Salvadó G, Molinuevo JL, Brugulat-Serrat A, Falcon C, Grau-Rivera O, Suárez-Calvet M, et al. Centiloid cut-off values for optimal agreement between PET and CSF core AD biomarkers. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11:27.

Landau SM, Harvey D, Madison CM, Koeppe RA, Reiman EM, Foster NL, et al. Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(7):1207–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.07.002.

Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012:774–81.

Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Therneau TM, Knopman DS, Lowe V, et al. Age-specific and sex-specific prevalence of cerebral β-amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration in cognitively unimpaired individuals aged 50–95 years: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(6):435–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30077-7.

Landau SM, Lu M, Joshi AD, Pontecorvo M, Mintun MA, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Comparing positron emission tomography imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measurements of β-amyloid. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(6):826–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23908.

Fortea J, Sala-Llonch R, Bartrés-Faz D, Lladó A, Solé-Padullés C, Bosch B, et al. Cognitively preserved subjects with transitional cerebrospinal fluid ß-amyloid 1-42 values have thicker cortex in Alzheimer’s disease vulnerable areas. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70:183–90.

La Joie R, Ayakta N, Seeley WW, Borys E, Boxer AL, DeCarli C, et al. Multisite study of the relationships between antemortem [11 C]PIB-PET Centiloid values and postmortem measures of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:205–16.

Amadoru S, Doré V, McLean CA, Hinton F, Shepherd CE, Halliday GM, et al. Comparison of amyloid PET measured in Centiloid units with neuropathological findings in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12:22.

Leuzy A, Chiotis K, Hasselbalch SG, Rinne JO, de Mendonça A, Otto M, et al. Pittsburgh compound B imaging and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β in a multicentre European memory clinic study. Brain. 2016;139(9):2540–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww160.

Rowe CC, Doré V, Jones G, Baxendale D, Mulligan RS, Bullich S, et al. 18F-Florbetaben PET beta-amyloid binding expressed in Centiloids. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:2053–9.

AHEAD 3-45 study: a study to evaluate efficacy and safety of treatment with BAN2401 in participants with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and elevated amyloid and also in participants with early preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and intermediate amyloid - Fu [Internet]. [cited 2020 Oct 15]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04468659?term=NCT04468659&draw=2&rank=1

Benjamini, Yoav ; Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.

Palmqvist S, Mattsson N, Hansson O. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-β accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain. 2016;139(4):1226–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww015.

Mattsson N, Insel PS, Donohue M, Landau S, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, et al. Independent information from cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β and florbetapir imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2015;138(3):772–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu367.

Milà-Alomà M, Salvadó G, Shekari M, Grau-Rivera O, Sala-Vila A, Sánchez-Benavides G, et al. Comparative analysis of different definitions of Amyloid-B positivity to detect early downstream pathophysiological alterations in preclinical Alzheimer. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis. 2021;8(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.51.

Chen CPC, Chen RL, Preston JE. The influence of ageing in the cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of proteins that are derived from the choroid plexus, brain, and plasma. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(4):323–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2012.01.008.

Masseguin C, LePanse S, Corman B, Verbavatz JM, Gabrion J. Aging affects choroidal proteins involved in CSF production in Sprague-Dawley rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26:917–27.

Chiu C, Miller MC, Caralopoulos IN, Worden MS, Brinker T, Gordon ZN, et al. Temporal course of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and amyloid accumulation in the aging rat brain from three to thirty months. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2012;9:3.

Van Harten AC, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Mielke MM, Kremers WK, Eichenlaub U, et al. CSF biomarkers in Olmsted County: evidence of 2 subclasses and associations with demographics. Neurology. 2020;95(3):E256–67. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009874.

Toledo JB, Zetterberg H, Van Harten AC, Glodzik L, Martinez-Lage P, Bocchio-Chiavetto L, et al. Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarker in cognitively normal subjects. Brain. 2015;138:2701–15.