Clinicians' and managers' responses to patients' complaints

Emerald - Tập 12 Số 4 - Trang 260-266 - 2007
RobertoNatangelo1
1Italian Society for Quality of Health Care, Milan, Italy

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss the analysis of complaints lodged by patients and how the complainants' letters are handled by health boards and clinicians.Design/methodology/approachA retrospective analysis of patients' complaints lodged with an independent voluntary citizens' association in Milan and, at the same time, against the hospital administration offices or the consultants and responses returned by the hospitals in reply to the patients. The authors assessed: the reasons for the complaints according to the citizen; the nature of the complaint according to a medical expert revue; and the handling of the complaint process by managers.FindingsFor 83 of 151 people (55 per cent), the reason was compensation for injury or pain. According to the medical review, in 54 cases (35.7 per cent), the main themes emerging were mainly “perceived” poor quality of care. Together, or alone, were problems of “technical” quality of care. A total of 94 complaints (62.2 per cent) had been dealt with by the Health Boards, but 48 cases (31.7 per cent) were dealt with by the legal office or the insurance company who replied without showing evidence that they had discussed events with clinicians. Many times the managers did not undertake a systematic investigation, leaving complainants dissatisfied with the process and the outcome.Originality/valueThis paper is the first to report the results of an assessment process of complaints lodged via an independent citizens' association in Italy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen, L.W., Creer, E. and Leggitt, M. (2000), “Developing a patient complaint tracking system to improve performance”, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 217‐26.

Allsop, J. and Mulchay, L. (1995), “Dealing with clinical complaints”, in Vincent, C. (Ed.), Clinical Risk Management, British Medical Journal Publishing Group, London, pp. 411‐32.

Beckman, H.W., Marhakis, K.M., Suchman, A.L. and Frankel, R.M. (1994), “The doctor‐patient relationship and malpractice: lessons from plaintiff depositions”, Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 154 No. 12, pp. 1363‐70.

Coyle, J. (1999), “Exploring the meaning of ‘dissatisfaction’ with health care: the importance of ‘personal identity threat’”, Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 95‐123.

Entwistle, V.A., Andrew, J.E., Emslie, M.J., Walker, K.A., Dorrian, C., Angus, V.C. and Conniff, A.O. (2003), “Public opinion on systems for feeding back views to the National Health Service”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 435‐42.

Liang, B.A. (2000), “Risks of reporting sentinel events”, Health Affairs, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 112‐20.

Mulcahy, L. (2003), Disputing Doctors: The Socio‐Legal Dynamics of Complaints about Medical Care, Open University Press, Suffolk.

Studdert, D.M., Thomas, E.J., Burstin, H.R., Brett, I.W., Zbar, B.A., Orav, E.J. and Brennan, T.A. (2000), “Negligent care and malpractice claiming behaviour in Utah and Colorado”, Medical Care, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 250‐60.

Vincent, C., Young, M. and Phillips, A. (1994), “Why people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action”, The Lancet, Vol. 343 No. 8913, pp. 1609‐13.

Wilson, R.M., Runciman, W.B., Gibberd, R.W., Harrison, B.T., Newby, L. and Hamilton, J.D. (1995), “The quality in Australian health care study”, The Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 153 No. 9, pp. 458‐71.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 12 Số 4

260-266

Thông tin tác giả