Chronic Effects of the Sympathetic Nervous System in Inflammatory Models

NeuroImmunoModulation - Tập 30 Số 1 - Trang 113-134 - 2023
Georg Pongratz1,2, Rainer H. Straub3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, St. John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
2Medical Faculty of the University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
3Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Neuroendocrino-Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

The immune system is embedded in a network of regulatory systems to keep homeostasis in case of an immunologic challenge. Neuroendocrine immunologic research has revealed several aspects of these interactions over the past decades, e.g., between the autonomic nervous system and the immune system. This review will focus on evidence revealing the role of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in chronic inflammation, like colitis, multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis, lupus erythematodes, and arthritis with a focus on animal models supported by human data. A theory of the contribution of the SNS in chronic inflammation will be presented that spans these disease entities. One major finding is the biphasic nature of the sympathetic contribution to inflammation, with proinflammatory effects until the point of disease outbreak and mainly anti-inflammatory influence thereafter. Since sympathetic nerve fibers are lost from sites of inflammation during inflammation, local cells and immune cells achieve the capability to endogenously produce catecholamines to fine-tune the inflammatory response independent of brain control. On a systemic level, it has been shown across models that the SNS is activated in inflammation as opposed to the parasympathetic nervous system. Permanent overactivity of the SNS contributes to many of the known disease sequelae. One goal of neuroendocrine immune research is defining new therapeutic targets. In this respect, it will be discussed that at least in arthritis, it might be beneficial to support β-adrenergic and inhibit α-adrenergic activity besides restoring autonomic balance. Overall, in the clinical setting, we now need controlled interventional studies to successfully translate the theoretical knowledge into benefits for patients.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.autneu.2013.12.007

10.1113/jphysiol.2013.268573

10.1096/fj.99-1082com

10.1136/ard.2009.119701

10.1371/journal.pbio.3001513

10.1186/s12950-023-00336-z

10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02218.x

10.1186/s13075-014-0504-2

10.1159/000362736

10.12703/r/10-83

10.1038/s41583-021-00532-x

10.1159/000087104

10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102946

10.1038/nrrheum.2012.181

10.1126/science.3014662

10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.021

10.4049/jimmunol.1300027

10.1097/00003072-199906000-00001

10.1073/pnas.1310655110

10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.003

10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.020

10.3390/biomedicines10081950

10.1186/s12974-022-02504-z

10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.033

10.1111/nmo.13676

10.1111/nmo.13163

10.1136/gut.2007.125401

10.1007/s10571-022-01246-z

10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.042

10.3892/mmr.2018.8378

10.1038/ni.3321

10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.09.004

10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.019

10.1016/j.bbi.2011.06.011

10.1007/s11481-009-9182-2

10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.10.051

10.1016/j.bbi.2014.01.007

10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.7079

10.3389/fimmu.2021.628065

10.1159/000508109

10.1080/08923973.2017.1286502

10.1016/j.lfs.2016.11.009

10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203925

10.3389/fimmu.2014.00346

10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202944

10.1016/j.bbi.2013.06.003

10.1016/j.niox.2012.06.005

10.1136/ard.2011.153056

10.1016/j.bbi.2011.07.001

10.1002/art.23628

10.1002/art.23869

10.1002/art.24030

10.1002/art.20987

10.1016/j.bbi.2004.02.004

10.1006/brbi.1999.0564

10.1016/0165-5728(95)00150-6

10.3390/ijms23169344

10.1016/0016-5085(94)90803-6

10.3748/wjg.v12.i2.302

10.1016/j.bbi.2016.04.017

10.1152/ajpgi.00330.2019

10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053158

10.3389/fimmu.2017.01452

10.1084/jem.20052362

10.1073/pnas.0803237105

10.1113/expphysiol.2011.061531

10.1016/j.bbi.2018.12.009

10.1016/j.tips.2004.10.007

10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.06.012

10.1111/nmo.13112

10.1097/MEG.0000000000001016

10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.09.003

10.1007/s00401-016-1631-4

10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.019

10.1007/s12026-019-09082-y

10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.12.009

10.1016/j.brainres.2004.11.060

10.1016/j.brainres.2005.05.066

10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb08156.x

10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb00747.x

10.1016/s0165-5728(02)00372-7

10.1191/135248506ms1269oa

10.1093/brain/awq362

10.1016/j.clim.2022.109021

10.1136/lupus-2016-000199

10.1006/brbi.1993.1015

10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2926

10.1002/hup.2306

10.1093/qjmed/92.2.97

10.1177/0961203309351540

10.1177/0961203311425518

10.1177/0961203317725590

10.1186/s13075-016-1087-x

10.3389/fimmu.2022.887460

10.1155/2013/764395

10.1093/rheumatology/kem301

10.1002/cne.20640

10.1136/ard.2005.038059

10.1016/j.autneu.2008.05.005

10.1093/rheumatology/36.12.1262

10.1196/annals.1410.026

10.1007/s10571-012-9805-7

10.1093/rheumatology/41.9.1031

10.1002/art.33431

10.1002/art.30516

10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06640-7

10.1136/ard.60.8.729

10.1038/s41584-020-0373-9

10.1016/s0165-5728(02)00035-8

10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103616

10.1038/s12276-022-00830-z

10.3390/jpm12111905

10.3389/fnins.2021.650971

10.1093/intimm/dxab068

10.1096/fasebj.13.6.715

10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1635

10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00050-x

10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.01.002

10.3390/ijms16035635

10.1189/jlb.2RU1116-474R

10.3389/fimmu.2018.00919

10.1073/pnas.1936664100