Changes in photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in sugarcane during the development of Yellow Canopy Syndrome

Functional Plant Biology - Tập 43 Số 6 - Trang 523 - 2016
Annelie Marquardt1,2, Gerard Scalia1, Priya Joyce1, Jaya Basnayake3, Frederik C. Botha1,2
1Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
2Sugar Research Australia, PO Box 68, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia.
3Sugar Research Australia, PO Box 387, Brandon, Qld 4808, Australia.

Tóm tắt

Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, electron transport, internal CO2 and sugar levels were determined in the leaves of Yellow Canopy Syndrome (YCS) symptomatic sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) plants. Two varieties from two different geographic regions in Australia, KQ228 and Q200 were used. Although visual yellowing was only evident in the lower leaves of the canopy (older than Leaf 5), photosynthesis and stomatal conductance were lower in both the yellowing leaves and those not yet showing any visible symptoms. On a canopy basis, photosynthesis was reduced by 14% and 36% in YCS symptomatic KQ228 and Q200 plants, respectively. Sucrose levels increased significantly in the leaves, reflecting some of the earliest changes induced in YCS symptomatic plants. The electron transport characteristics of dark-adapted leaves showed disruptions on both the electron acceptor and donor side of PSII. Some of these changes are characteristic of a degree of disruption to the protein structure associated with the electron transport chain. Based on the results, we propose that the first change in metabolism in the YCS symptomatic plants was an increase in sucrose in the leaves and that all the other changes are secondary effects modulated by the increased sugar levels.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baker, 2008, Plant Physiology, 146, 1085, 10.1104/pp.107.111476

Braun, 2009, Plant Physiology, 149, 71, 10.1104/pp.108.129049

Chaves, 2002, Annals of Botany, 89, 907, 10.1093/aob/mcf105

Chinnaraja, 2015, Phytoparasitica, 43, 339, 10.1007/s12600-015-0468-z

Du, 1999, Plant, Cell & Environment, 22, 317, 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00415.x

Fontaniella, 2003, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 41, 1027, 10.1016/j.plaphy.2003.09.004

Ghannoum, 2009, Annals of Botany, 103, 635, 10.1093/aob/mcn093

Girma, 1992, Plant Physiology, 99, 577, 10.1104/pp.99.2.577

Jensen, 1996, Phytopathology, 59, 1694

Jiang, 2006, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, 261, 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.007

Kelly, 2013, The Plant Journal, 75, 977, 10.1111/tpj.12258

Krapp, 1995, Planta, 195, 313, 10.1007/BF00202587

Lehrer, 2009, Journal of General Plant Pathology, 75, 288, 10.1007/s10327-009-0172-2

Long, 1996, Journal of Experimental Botany, 47, 1629, 10.1093/jxb/47.11.1629

McCormick, 2008, Journal of Plant Physiology, 165, 1817, 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.01.008

Medrano, 2002, Annals of Botany, 89, 895, 10.1093/aob/mcf079

Moonan, 2000, Virology, 269, 156, 10.1006/viro.1999.0162

M�ller-R�ber, 1992, The EMBO Journal, 11, 1229, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05167.x

Pokorska, 2009, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) ? Bioenergetics, 1787, 1161, 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.05.002

Rodr�guez, 2013, Redox Report, 18, 27, 10.1179/1351000212Y.0000000035

Schansker, 2005, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) ? Bioenergetics, 1706, 250, 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.11.006

Sheen, 1994, Photosynthesis Research, 39, 427, 10.1007/BF00014596

Slewinski, 2010, Plant Science, 178, 341, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.01.010

Slewinski, 2012, Plant Physiology, 160, 1540, 10.1104/pp.112.202473

Tollenaar, 1982, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 62, 855, 10.4141/cjps82-128

T�th, 2011, Plant Physiology, 156, 382, 10.1104/pp.110.171918

Tsimilli-Michael, 2013, Photosynthesis Research, 117, 289, 10.1007/s11120-013-9895-1

van Heerden, 2007, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 61, 124, 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.005

Vega, 1997, Plant Disease Reporter, 81, 21, 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.1.21

Yan, 2008, Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 73, 78, 10.1016/j.pmpp.2009.02.004