Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 is the best predictor of clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints

Alzheimer's & Dementia - Tập 9 - Trang 481-487 - 2013
Argonde C. van Harten1,2, Pieter Jelle Visser1,2,3, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg1,2, Charlotte E. Teunissen4, Marinus A. Blankenstein4, Philip Scheltens1,2, Wiesje M. van der Flier1,2,5
1Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology/Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
4Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackgroundThe need to recognize Alzheimer's disease (AD) as early as possible led us to evaluate the predictive value of amyloid β(1‐42) (Aβ42), total tau (tau), and phosphorylated tau (ptau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints.MethodsWe recruited nondemented patients with subjective complaints (i.e., criteria for mild cognitive impairment [MCI] not fulfilled) from our memory clinic. We assessed the predictive value of CSF Aβ42, tau, and ptau for clinical progression using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, and baseline findings on the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). Clinical progression was defined as progression to MCI or AD.ResultsWe included 127 patients with subjective complaints (age 60 ± 10 years, 61 [48%] females, MMSE 29 ± 1). At baseline, Aβ42 and tau were abnormal in 20 patients (both 16%), and ptau in 32 patients (25%). Thirteen patients (10%) progressed to MCI (n = 11) or AD (n = 2). Aβ42 was the strongest predictor of progression to MCI or AD with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 16.0 (3.8–66.4). The adjusted HR associated with tau was 2.8 (0.9–9.2) and with ptau 2.6 (0.8–8.2). Combinations of biomarkers had a lower predictive value than Aβ42 alone.ConclusionLow Aβ42 was the strongest predictor of clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints. These results are in line with the hypothesis that the cascade of pathologic events starts with deposition of Aβ42, whereas neuronal degeneration and hyperphosphorylation of tau are more downstream events, closer to clinical manifestation of AD.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181919a48 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003 10.1212/WNL.46.3.707 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.30 Geerlings MI, 1999, Association between memory complaints and incident Alzheimer's disease in elderly people with normal baseline cognition, Am J Psychiatry., 156, 531, 10.1176/ajp.156.4.531 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4 10.1001/jama.2009.1064 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70139-5 10.1080/15622970701535502 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00530-1 10.1001/archneur.64.3.noc60123 10.1136/jnnp.2006.100529 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267428.62582.aa 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 10.1007/BF03074823 Brandt J, 1988, The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol., 1, 111 10.1373/clinchem.2009.130518 10.1212/WNL.52.8.1555 10.1016/0165-6147(91)90609-V 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06181.x 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6 Rossum IA, 2010, Biomarkers as predictors for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer‐type dementia: Implications for trial design, J Alzheimers Dis., 20, 881, 10.3233/JAD-2010-091606 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bd8271 10.1001/archneur.59.11.1729 10.3233/JAD-2009-0999 10.1212/01.wnl.0000286944.22262.ff 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181af79fb CETeunissen NAVerwey MIKester KvanUffelen MABlankenstein.Standardization of assay procedures for analysis of the CSF biomarkers amyloid beta((1‐42)) tau and phosphorylated tau in Alzheimer's disease: Report of an international workshop.Int J Alzheimers Dis.2010 Sep 27;2010 10.1002/ana.22248 10.1001/archneur.65.11.1509 10.1093/brain/awm238 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.011 10.1159/000105017 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820af900 10.1001/archneurol.2009.269 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182563bbe 10.1136/jnnp.2008.167791 10.1001/archneur.63.5.665 10.1159/000321352 10.1176/ajp.152.10.1476 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.002