Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs
Tóm tắt
The authors provide a cautionary note on reporting accurate eta-squared values from multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) designs. They reinforce the distinction between classical and partial eta-squared as measures of strength of association. They provide examples from articles published in premier psychology journals in which the authors erroneously reported partial eta-squared values as representing classical etasquared values. Finally, they discuss broader impacts of inaccurately reported etasquared values for theory development, meta-analytic reviews, and intervention programs.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Psychological Association, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 5
Cohen, J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2
Cohen, J., 2003, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3
Hays, W. L., 1994, Statistics, 5
Johnson, B. T., 1993, DSTAT 1.10: Software for the meta-analytic reviewof research literatures
Keppel, G., 1991, Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook, 3
Maxwell, S. E., 2000, Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective
SPSS, Inc., 2001, SPSS for Windows
Thompson, B., 1994, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837
Zedeck, S., 2002, The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 40, 140