Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC*

Contemporary Accounting Research - Tập 13 Số 1 - Trang 1-36 - 1996
Patricia M. Dechow1, Richard G. Sloan1, Amy Patricia Sweeney2
1#N# * University of Pennsylvania.
2Harvard University

Tóm tắt

Abstract. This study investigates firms subject to accounting enforcement actions by the Securities and Exchange Commission for alleged violations of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We investigate: (i) the extent to which the alleged earnings manipulations can be explained by extant earnings management hypotheses; (ii) the relation between earnings manipulations and weaknesses in firms' internal governance structures; and (iii) the capital market consequences experienced by firms when the alleged earnings manipulations are made public. We find that an important motivation for earnings manipulation is the desire to attract external financing at low cost. We show that this motivation remains significant after controlling for contracting motives proposed in the academic literature. We also find that firms manipulating earnings are: (i) more likely to have boards of directors dominated by management; (ii) more likely to have a Chief Executive Officer who simultaneously serves as Chairman of the Board; (iii) more likely to have a Chief Executive Officer who is also the firm's founder, (iv) less likely to have an audit committee; and (v) less likely to have an outside blockholder. Finally, we document that firms manipulating earnings experience significant increases in their costs of capital when the manipulations are made public.

Résumé. Les auteurs analysent les entreprises assujetties aux mesures d'exécution prises par la Securities and Exchange Commission dans les cas de présomption de transgression des principes comptables généralement reconnus. Ils s'intéressent aux aspects suivants de la question: i) la mesure dans laquelle les présomptions de manipulations des bénéfices peuvent être expliquées par les hypothèses existantes de gestion des bénéfices; ii) la relation entre les manipulations de bénéfices et les faiblesses des structures de régie interne des entreprises; et iii) la réaction du marché financier à l'endroit des entreprises au sujet desquelles les présomptions de manipulation des bénéfices sont rendues publiques. Les auteurs constatent qu'un incitatif majeur à la manipulation des bénéfices est le désir d'obtenir du financement externe à moindre coût. Ils démontrent que cet incitatif demeure important même après le contrôle des motifs contractuels que mettent de l'avant les travaux théoriques. Ils constatent également que les entreprises qui manipulent les bénéfices sont: i) davantage susceptibles d'avoir des conseils d'administration dominés par la direction; ii) davantage susceptibles d'avoir un chef de la direction qui joue simultanément le rôle de président du conseil; iii) davantage susceptibles d'avoir un chef de la direction qui est également le fondateur de l'entreprise; iv) moins susceptibles d'avoir un comité de vérification; et v) moins susceptibles d'avoir un bloc de titres détenus par un actionnaire extérieur. Enfin, les auteurs établissent le fait que le coût du capital, pour les entreprises qui manipulent les bénéfices, enregistre des hausses appréciables lorsque ces manipulations sont rendues publiques.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aharony J. C.Lin andM. P.Loeb.Initial Public Offerings Accounting Choices and Earnings Management.Contemporary Accounting Research(Fall 1993) 61–81.

10.1016/0304-405X(86)90065-6

Asquith P. andL.Meulbroek.An Empirical Investigation of Short Interests. Working paper Harvard University(1993).

1994, Earnings Announcements: The Incremental Role of Predisclosure Information Asymmetry, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 281

Baiman S. andR.Verrecchia.Earnings and Price‐based Compensation Contracts in the Presence of Discretionary Trading. Working paper University of Pennsylvania(1993).

10.1016/0304-405X(74)90014-2

Botosan C.The Impact of Annual Report Disclosure Level on Investor Base and the Cost of Capital. Working paper University of Washington St. Louis(1995).

10.1086/467134

Brown L. D., 1992, The Impact of Annual Earnings Announcements on Convergence of Beliefs, Accounting Review, 67, 862

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04668.x

10.1016/0165-4101(90)90039-7

10.2307/3665842

DeAngelo L. E.Auditor Size and Audit Quality.Journal‐of Accounting and Economics. (December 1981) 183–199.

Dechow P. M., 1995, Detecting Earnings Management, The Accounting Review, 70, 193

DeFond M. L., 1991, Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors, Accounting Review, 66, 643

DeFond M. L.Factors Related to Auditor‐client Disagreements over Income‐Increasing Accounting Methods.Contemporary Accounting Research(Spring 1993) 415–431.

10.1016/0165-4101(90)90041-2

10.1016/0165-4101(91)90009-D

10.2307/2491006

Frankel R. M. M. F.McNichols andG. P.Wilson.Discretionary Disclosure and External Financing.The Accounting Review(January 1995) 135–150.

Friedlan J. M.Accounting Choices of Issuers of Initial Public Offerings.Contemporary Accounting Research (Summer 1994) 1–31.

Greene W. H., 1993, Econometric Analysis

10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1

Healy P., 1993, The Effect of Firms' Financial Disclosure Strategies on Stock Prices, Accounting Horizons, 7, 1

Healy P. K.PalepuandA. P.Sweeney.Do Firms Benefit from Expanded Voluntary Disclosure. Working paper Harvard University(1995).

Holthausen R. andD.Larcker.Board of Directors Ownership Structure and CEO Compensation. Working paper University of Pennsylvania(1993).

10.1086/296600

Jensen M.The Modern Industrial Revolution Exist and the Failure of Internal Control Systems Journal of Finance. (July 1993) 831–880.

10.2307/2491047

Kellogg I., 1991, Fraud, Window Dressing, and Negligence in Financial Statements

10.1016/0165-4101(94)90004-3

10.2307/2491273

10.1093/rfs/6.2.345

10.2307/41166701

Loughran T. andJ. R.Ritter.The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings.Working paper. University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign. (1994).

Loughran T.The New Issues Puzzle.Journal of Finance (1995).

Opler T. andS.Titman.The Debt‐Equity choices: An Analysis of Issuing Firms.Working paper. Ohio State University. (1994).

Merton R. C.A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information.The Journal of Finance. (July 1987) 483–510.

National Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Cooking the Books:What Every Accountant Should Know about Fraud. NASBA New York NY. (1993).

Palmrose Z., 1988, Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality, Accounting Review, 63, 55

Pincus K., 1988, Reducing the Incidence of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: The Role of the Securities and Exchange Commission

10.1016/0165-4101(90)90042-3

Rangan S.Earnings Around Seasoned Equity Offerings: Are They Overstated? Working paper University of Pennsylvania (1995).

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x

Romano R., 1991, The Shareholder Suit: Litigation without Foundation, Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 7, 55

10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H

Schipper K., 1989, Commentary on earnings management, Accounting Horizons, 3, 91

Securities and Exchange Commission.Fifty‐first Annual Report of the SEC Printing Office(1989).

Sibson and Company., 1989, Annual Report 1989: Executive Compensation

10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W

Spiess D. K. andJ.Affleck‐Graves.Under‐Performance in Long Run Stock Returns Following Seasoned Equity Offerings.Journal of Financial Economics(forthcoming1995).

10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2

Teoh S. H. T. J.Wong andG. R.Rao Incentives and Opportunities for Earnings Management in Initial Public Offerings Working paper University of Michigan Ann Arbor (1994).

Teoh S. H. I.Welch andT. J.Wong Earnings Management and the Post‐Issue Underperformance of Seasoned Equity Offerings Working paper University of Michigan Ann Arbor (1995).

Watts R., 1990, Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective, Accounting Review, 65, 131

Weisbach M. S.Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.Journal of Financial Economics(JanuaryMarch 1988) 431–460.

10.1016/0165-4101(81)90010-0