Case Study of Ecstatic Meditation: fMRI and EEG Evidence of Self-Stimulating a Reward System

Neural Plasticity - Tập 2013 - Trang 1-12 - 2013
Michael R. Hagerty1, Julian Isaacs2, Leigh Brasington3, Larry Shupe4, Eberhard E. Fetz5, Steven C. Cramer6
1University of California, Davis and Wellspring Institute, Davis, CA 95616, USA. [email protected]
2Wellspring Institute, San Rafael, CA 94903, USA
3Barre Center for Buddhist Studies, Barre, MA 01005, USA
4University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
5Physiology & Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
6Department of Neurology and Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

Tóm tắt

We report the first neural recording during ecstatic meditations called jhanas and test whether a brain reward system plays a role in the joy reported. Jhanas are Altered States of Consciousness (ASC) that imply major brain changes based on subjective reports: (1) external awareness dims, (2) internal verbalizations fade, (3) the sense of personal boundaries is altered, (4) attention is highly focused on the object of meditation, and (5) joy increases to high levels. The fMRI and EEG results from an experienced meditator show changes in brain activity in 11 regions shown to be associated with the subjective reports, and these changes occur promptly after jhana is entered. In particular, the extreme joy is associated not only with activation of cortical processes but also with activation of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the dopamine/opioid reward system. We test three mechanisms by which the subject might stimulate his own reward system by external means and reject all three. Taken together, these results demonstrate an apparently novel method of self-stimulating a brain reward system using only internal mental processes in a highly trained subject.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1902

1964

10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.98

2008

10.1037/a0015952

2001

10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.060

10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00175-0

2006

10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005

10.1371/journal.pone.0001897

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.061

10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19

10.1073/pnas.0606552104

10.1177/0956797610370159

10.1097/01.PSY.0000077505.67574.E3

10.1073/pnas.0707678104

10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.227

10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00052-7

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.068

2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 199, 10.1038/35044563

10.1038/nrn2357

10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.021

10.1038/nrn1747

10.1073/pnas.191355898

10.1093/cercor/13.10.1064

2002, Brain, 125, 1014, 10.1093/brain/awf108

10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00751-7

10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003

10.1073/pnas.0706929105

10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.021

10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403

10.1177/1073858406293154

10.1126/science.1150605

10.1002/hbm.10040

10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00169-1

2002, NeuroImage, 16

10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.004

10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010

10.1073/pnas.0407401101

10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02094-8

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.026

10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00286-6

1978, Science, 199, 852, 10.1126/science.341314

10.1038/nn868

10.1006/ccog.1999.0403

2009

2008