Cas-enabled technologies as ‘agents provocateurs’ in teaching and learning mathematical modelling in secondary school classrooms

Beatty, R., & Geiger, V. (2010). Technology, communication and collaboration: Rethinking communities of inquiry, learning and practice. In C. Hoyles, & J-B. Lagrange (Eds.),Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 251–284). New York:Springer.

Blum, W., Galbraith, P., Henn, H. & Niss, M. (Eds.) (2007).Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study. New York:Springer.

Burns, R. (2000).Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Melbourne:Longman.

Burrill, G. (1992). The graphing calculator: A tool for change. In J. F. C. Hirsch (Ed.),Calculators in mathematics education (pp. 14–22). Reston, VA:NCTM

Confrey, J., & Maloney, A. (2007). In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.),Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 57–68). New York:Springer.

Diezmann, C., Faragher, R., Lowrie, T., Bicknell, B., & Putt, I. (2004). Exceptional students in mathematics. In B. Perry, G. Anthony & C. Diezmann (Eds.),Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2000 – 2003. Flaxton, QLD:Post Pressed.

Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143–163.

Drijvers, P. (2000).Learning algebra in a computer algebra environment. Utrecht, The Netherlands:CD-B Press.

Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (1999). Technology, mathematics, and people: Interactions in a community of practice. In J. Truran & K. Truran (Eds.),Making the difference (Proceedings of 22nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Adelaide, pp. 223–230). Sydney:MERGA.

Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2003). Technology-enriched classrooms: Some implications for teaching applications and modelling. In Q. Ye, W. Blum, S. K. Houston, & Q. Jiang (Eds.),Mathematical modelling in education and culture (pp. 111–125). Chichester, UK:Horwood.

Geiger, V. (1998). Students’ perspectives on using computers and graphing calculators during mathematical collaborative practice. In C. Kanes, M. Goos & E. Warren (Eds.),Teaching mathematics in new times (Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 217–224). Gold Coast, QLD:MERGA.

Geiger, V., & Goos, M. (1996). Number plugging or problem solving? Using technology to support collaborative learning. In P. Clarkson (Ed.),Technology in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 229–236). Melbourne:MERGA.

Geiger, V., Faragher, R., Redmond, T., & Lowe, J. (2008). CAS enabled devices as provocative agents in the process of mathematical modelling. In M. Goos, R. Brown & K Maker (Eds.),Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Brisbane, Vol. 1, pp. 246–253). Adelaide:MERGA.

Goos, M., & Cretchley, P. (2004). Computers, multimedia, and the internet in mathematics education. In B. Perry, C. Diezmann & G. Anthony (Eds.),Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2000–2003 (pp. 151–174). Flaxton, QLD:Post Pressed.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000a).Classroom voices: Technology enriched interactions in a community of mathematical practice. Paper presented at the Working Group for Action 11 (The Use of Technology in Mathematics Education) at the 9th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Tokyo/Makuhari, 31 July – 6 August 2000.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000b). Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 303–320.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 73–89.

Huntley, M. A., Rasmussen, C. L., Villarubi, R. S., Santong, J., & Fey, J. T. (2000). Effects of standards-based mathematics education: A study of the Core-Plus Mathematics Project algebra and function strand.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 328–361.

Kissane, B. (1999). The algebraic calculator and mathematics education. In W.-C. Yang, D. Wang, S.-C. Chu, & G. Fitz-Gerald (Eds.),Proceedings of the 4th Asian Technology Conference on Mathematics (pp. 123–132). Guangzhou, China:Program Committee.

Kissane, B. (2001). The algebra curriculum and personal technology: Exploring the links. In A. Rogerson (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Conference: New Ideas in Mathematics Education (pp. 127–132). Palm Cove, QLD:Program Committee.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.

Manouchehri, A. (2004). Using interactive algebra software to support a discourse community.Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(1), 37–62.

Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.),Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 3–32). New York:Springer.

Pea, R. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning.Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.

Pea, R. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.),Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89–122). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ramsden, P. (1997, June).Mathematica in education: Old wine in new bottles or a whole new vineyard? Paper presented at the Second International Mathematica Symposium, Rovamiemi, Finland.

Simonsen, L., & Dick, T. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of graphing calculators in the mathematics classroom.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 239–268.

Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Thomas, M. O. J. (2001). Building a conceptual algebra curriculum: The role of technological tools. In H. Chick, K. Stacey J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.),The future of teaching and learning of algebra (Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference) (pp. 582–589). Melbourne, Australia:Department of Science and Mathematics Education, The University of Melbourne.

Trouche, L. (2005). Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven & L. Trouche (Eds.),The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (pp. 197–230). New York:Springer.

Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2006).Mathematics Victorian Certificate of Education study design. Melbourne: VCAA. Retrieved 20 November 2008 from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/mathematics/mathsstd.pdf

Willis, S., & Kissane, B. (1989). Computer technology and teacher education in mathematics. In Department of Employment, Education and Training (Ed.),Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science (Vol. 3, pp. 57–92). Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Service.

Yerushalmy, M. (2000). Problem solving strategies and mathematics resources: A longitudinal view on problem solving in a functional based approach to algebra.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(2), 125–147.

Zbiek, R. M. (2003). Using research to influence teaching and learning with Computer Algebra Systems. In J. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin, & R. M. Zbieck (Eds.),Computer Algebra Systems in secondary school mathematics education (pp. 197–216). Reston, VA:NCTM.