Cardiac vagal flexibility and accurate personality impressions: Examining a physiological correlate of the good judge

Journal of Personality - Tập 86 Số 6 - Trang 1065-1077 - 2018
Lauren J. Human1, Wendy Berry Mendes2
1Department of Psychology, McGill University
2Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectiveResearch has long sought to identify which individuals are best at accurately perceiving others' personalities or are good judges, yet consistent predictors of this ability have been difficult to find. In the current studies, we revisit this question by examining a novel physiological correlate of social sensitivity, cardiac vagal flexibility, which reflects dynamic modulation of cardiac vagal control.MethodWe examined whether greater cardiac vagal flexibility was associated with forming more accurate personality impressions, defined as viewing targets more in line with their distinctive self‐reported profile of traits, in two studies, including a thin‐slice video perceptions study (N = 109) and a dyadic interaction study (N = 175).ResultsAcross studies, we found that individuals higher in vagal flexibility formed significantly more accurate first impressions of others' more observable personality traits (e.g., extraversion, creativity, warmth). These associations held while including a range of relevant covariates, including cardiac vagal tone, sympathetic activation, and gender.ConclusionIn sum, social sensitivity as indexed by cardiac vagal flexibility is linked to forming more accurate impressions of others' observable traits, shedding light on a characteristic that may help to identify the elusive good judge and providing insight into its neurobiological underpinnings.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1037/h0075237

10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431

Bartz J. A., 2011, Social effects of oxytocin in humans: Context and person matter, Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 301

10.18637/jss.v067.i01

10.1017/S0954579401002012

10.1037/a0017376

10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729

10.1080/00273171.2010.519262

10.1177/0956797610364121

Biesanz J. C. &Schrager S. M.(2017).Sample size planning with effect size estimates. Unpublished manuscript.

10.1177/0963721416651960

10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.004

10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009

10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.001

10.1177/1948550617691097

10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.861

10.1037/h0044919

10.1037/10001-000

10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.008

10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.009

10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652

10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50025-1

10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.409

10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x

10.1080/10615806.2016.1259473

10.1007/s10919-009-0070-5

10.1007/s11031-009-9128-2

10.1111/jopy.12262

10.1111/jopy.12097

10.1037/a0023782

10.1037/a0021850

10.1177/1948550612463735

10.1177/1948550616644964

10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.03.002

Human L. J. West T. V. &Mendes W. B.(2018). Just be yourself? Effects of an explicit authenticity motivation on the accuracy and positivity of first impressions. Manuscript in preparation.

10.1037/emo0000369

10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02455.x

Kenny D. A., 1994, Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis

10.1177/0146167201276007

10.1037/a0032725

10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.001

10.1037/pspp0000016

10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.79

10.1037/met0000036

R Development Core Team, 2016, R: A language and environment for statistical computing

10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.06.006

10.1177/014662167700100306

10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01394.x

10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009

Rogers K. H., 2015, The “good dyad”: Examining the impact of personality and behavior on dyadic accuracy in first impressions

10.1037/a0039587

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02765.x

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00289.x

10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8

Swann W. B., 1983, Social psychological perspectives on the self, 33

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00251.x

10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00882.x

10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

10.1177/1088868315581119

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x