Carbon Monitoring Costs and their Effect on Incentives to Sequester Carbon through Forestry

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 - Trang 273-293 - 2004
Oscar J. Cacho1, Russell M. Wise1, Kenneth G. MacDicken2
1Graduate School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of New England, Armidale
2Forestry R & D Manager, P.T. Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper, Pekanbaru; Propinsi Riau, Indonesia

Tóm tắt

Technically, forestry projects have thepotential to contribute significantly tothe mitigation of global warming, but manysuch projects may not be economicallyattractive at current estimates of carbon(C) prices. Forest C is, in a sense, a newcommodity that must be measured toacceptable standards for the commodity toexist. This will require that credible Cmeasuring and monitoring procedures be inplace. The amount of sequestered C that canbe claimed by a project is normallyestimated based on sampling a number ofsmall plots, and the precision of thisestimate depends on the number of plotssampled and on the spatial variability ofthe site. Measuring C can be expensive andhence it is important to select anefficient C-monitoring strategy to makeprojects competitive in the C market. Thispaper presents a method to determinewhether a forestry project will benefitfrom C trading, and to find the optimalmanagement strategy in terms of forestcycle length and C-monitoring strategyA model of an Acacia mangiumplantation in southern Sumatra, Indonesiais used to show that forestry projects canbe economically attractive under a range ofconditions, provided that the project islarge enough to absorb fixed costs.Modeling results indicate that between 15and 38 Mg of Certified Emission Reductions(CERs) per hectare can be captured by thesimulated plantation under optimalmanagement, with optimality defined asmaximizing the present value of profitsobtained from timber and C. The optimalcycle length ranged from 12 to 16 years andthe optimal number of sample plots rangedfrom 0 to 30. Costs of C monitoring (inpresent-value terms) were estimated to bebetween 0.45 (Mg C)-1 to 2.11 (MgC)-1 depending on the spatialvariability of biomass, the variable costsof C monitoring and the discount rate.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Blair, G.J., Lefroy, R.D.B. and Lisle, L.: 1995, ‘Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems’, Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46, 1459–1466. Blanco, J. and Fornier, C.: 2000, ‘Specialised considerations regarding the “expiring CERs” proposal’, Ministry of Environment Columbia 17. Boscolo, M., Powell, M., Delaney, M., Brown, S. and Faris, R.: 2000, ‘The cost of inventorying and monitoring carbon: lessons from the Noel Kempff climate action project’, Journal of Forestry 98(9), 24–31. Brown, S.: 1997, Estimating Biomass and Biomass Change in Tropical Forests: A Primer, Rome, Italy, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Brown, S.: 2002, ‘Measuring, monitoring and verification of carbon benefits for forest-based projects’, Royal Soc. London Phil. Trans. Ser. 360, 1669–1683. Brown, S., Burnham, M., Delaney, M., Powell, M., Vaca, R. and Moreno, A.: 2000a, ‘Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon offset projects: A case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 5(1), 99–121. Brown, S., Gillespie, A.J.R. and Lugo, A.E.: 1989, ‘Biomass estimation methods for topical forest with applications to forest inventory data’, Forest Sci. 35, 881–902. Brown, S., Masera, O. and Sathaye, J.: 2000b, ‘Project-based activities’, in R.T. Watson, I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, N. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo and D.J. Dokken (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, A special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–338. Cacho, O.J., Hean, R.L. and Wise, R.M.: 2003, ‘Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives’, Aust. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 47(2), 153–179. Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H. and Baumgardner, G.A.: 1997, ‘Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests’, Oecologia 111(1), 1–11. Catchpole, W.R. and Wheeler, C.J.: 1992, ‘Estimating plant biomass: A review of techniques’, Aust. J. Ecol. 17, 121–131. Chambers, J.Q., Higuchi, N., Araujo, T.M. and Santos, J.C.: 2001, ‘Tree damage, allometric relationships and above-ground net primary production’, Forest Ecol. Manag. 152, 73–84. Coomes, D.A., Allen, R.B., Scott, N.A., Goulding, C. and Beets, P.: 2002, ‘Designing systems to monitor carbon stocks in forest and shrublands’, Forest Ecol. Manag. 164, 89–108. Delaney, M., Hairiah, K., Purnomosidhi, P. and Roshetko, J.M.: 2002, ‘Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: Can smallholder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage?’ Amer. J. Alt. Agric. 17(3), 138–148. Hamburg, S.P.: 2000, ‘Simple rules for measuring changes in ecosystem carbon in forestry-offset projects’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 5(1), 25–37. Hanley, N., Shogren, J.F. and White, B.: 1997, Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice, London, MacMillan Press Ltd. Hardiyanto, E.B., Ryantoko, A. and Anshori, S.: 2000, ‘Effects of site management in Acacia mangium plantations at PT. Musi Hutan Persada, South Sumatra, Indonesia’, in J. Ranger (ed.), Site Management and Productivity in Tropical Plantation Forests, Workshop Proceedings 7-11 December 1999, Kerala, India, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), pp. 41–50. Hassall and Associates: 1999, Greenhouse, Carbon Trading and Land Management, Canberra, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation. Kirschbaum, M.U.F.: 1999, ‘CenW, a forest growth model with linked carbon, energy, nutrient and water cycles’, Ecol. Model. 118(1), 17–59. Kurz, W.A., Beukema, S.J. and Apps, M.J.: 1996, ‘Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector’, Can. J. Forest Res. 26, 1973–1979. Lal, R., Kimble, J., Follett, R.F. and Stewart, B.S. (eds.): 2001, Assessment Methods for Soil, Boca Raton, Fla., London, Lewis Publishers. MacDicken, K.G.: 1997, A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects, Forest Carbon Monitoring Program, Arlington, VA, Institute for Agricultural Development. Winrock International. Marland, G., Fruit, K. and Sedjo, R.: 2001, ‘Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence’, Envir. Sci. Pol. 4(6), 259–268. Mooney, S., Antle, J., Capalbo, S. and Paustian, K.H.: 2002, Contracting for Soil Carbon Credits: Design and Costs of Measurement and Monitoring, Long Beach, California, American Agricultural Economics Association. Noble, I.R., Apps, M.J., Houghton, R.A., Lashof, D.A., Makundi, W., Murdiyarso, D., Murray, B., Sombroek, W. and Riccardo, V.: 2000, ‘Implications of different definitions and generic issues’, in R.T. Watson, I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo and D.J. Dokken (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, USA, pp. 53–126. Paul, K.I., Polglase, P.J., Nyakuengama, J.G. and Khanna, P.K.: 2002, ‘Change in soil carbon following afforestation’, Forest Ecol. Manag. 168, 241–257. Phillips, D.L., Brown, S.L., Schroeder, P.E. and Birdsey, R.A.: 2000, ‘Toward error analysis of large-scale forest carbon budgets’, Global Ecol. Biogeo. 9, 305–33. Pienaar, L.V. and Turnbull, K.J.: 1973, ‘The Chapman-Richards generalization of Von Bertalanffy's growth model for basal area growth and yield in even-aged stands’, Forest Sci. 19(1), 2–22. Post, W.M., Izaurralde, R.C. and Mann, L.K.: 2001, ‘Monitoring and verifying changes of organic carbon in soil’, Climate Change 51, 73–99. Thompson, S.K.: 1992, Sampling, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. UNFCCC: 2002, Reports of the Conference of Parties on its Seventh Session, held in Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2. van Noordwijk, M., Kurniatun, H. and Sitompul, S.M.: 2001, ‘Reducing uncertainties in the assessment at national scale of C stock impacts of land use change’, Paper read at Proceedings of the IGES/NIES Workshop on GHG Inventories for Asia-Pacific Region., 9-10 March, 2000, at Hayama, Japan. Vine, E., Sathaye, J. and Makundi, W.: 1999, Guidelines for the Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting, Verification and Certification of Forestry Projects for Climate Change Mitigation, Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Climate Policy and Program Division, Berkeley, Energy Analysis Department Environmental Energy Technologies Division. Watson, R.T., Noble, I.R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N.H., Verardo, D.J. and Dokken, D.J.: 2000, Land use, Land-use Change and Forestry, A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). New York, USA., Cambridge University Press. Wise, R.M. and Cacho, O.L.: 2002, ‘A bioeconomic analysis of soil carbon sequestration in agroforests’, ACIAR Project ASEM 1999/096 Working Paper CC02. http://www.une.edu.au/febl/Economics/carbon/CC02.PDF. Woomer, P.L., Palm, C.A., Alegre, J., Castilla, C., Cordeiro, D.G., Hairiah, K., Kotto-Same, J., Moukam, A., Riese, A., Rodrigues, V. and van Noordwijk, M.: 2000, ‘Slash-and-burn effects on carbon stocks in the humid tropics’, in R. Lal, J.M. Kimble and B.A. Stewart (eds.), Global Climate Change and Tropical Ecosystems, CRC Press, Boca Raton publishing, pp. 99–115.