Carbon Capture by Fossil Fuel Power Plants: An Economic Analysis

Management Science - Tập 57 Số 1 - Trang 21-39 - 2011
Özge İşlegen1, Stefan Reichelstein1
1Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305

Tóm tắt

For fossil fuel power plants to be built in the future, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies offer the potential for significant reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. We examine the break-even value for CCS adoptions, that is, the critical value in the charge for CO2 emissions that would justify investment in CCS capabilities. Our analysis takes explicitly into account that the supply of electricity at the wholesale level (generation) is organized competitively in some U.S. jurisdictions, whereas in others a regulated utility provides integrated generation and distribution services. For either market structure, we find that emissions charges near $30 per tonne of CO2 would be the break-even value for adopting CCS capabilities at new coal-fired power plants. The corresponding break-even values for natural gas plants are substantially higher, near $60 per tonne. Our break-even estimates serve as a basis for projecting the change in electricity prices once carbon emissions become costly. CCS capabilities effectively put an upper bound on the increase in electricity prices resulting from carbon regulations, and we estimate this bound to be near 30% at the retail level for both coal and natural gas plants. In contrast to the competitive power supply scenario, however, these price increases materialize only gradually for a regulated utility. The delay in price adjustments reflects that for regulated firms the basis for setting product prices is historical cost, rather than current cost. This paper was accepted by Gérard P. Cachon, accounting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/BF02868559

10.2202/1553-3832.1270

Ball J., 2008, Wall Street Journal, A6

10.1016/S1040-6190(00)00124-X

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2006, Presentation, EPRI

Galbraith K., 2009, New York Times, B3

10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.266

10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105630

Kolstad C., Young D. Cost analysis of carbon capture and storage for the Latrobe valley. (2010) . Working paper, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara

Laffont J. J., 1993, A Theory of Incentives in Procurment and Regulation

Leach A., Mason C., van't Veld K. Co-optimization of enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration. (2009) . NBER Working Paper 15035, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

Mas-Colell A., 1995, Microeconomic Theory

National Regulatory Research Institute (NRRI) What generation mix suits your state? Tools for Comparing fourteen technologies across nine criteria. (2007) . Working paper, National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus, OH

Nezlobin A., Rajan M., Reichelstein S. Dynamics of rate of return regulation. (2010) . Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Nicholson W., 2005, Intermediate Microeconomics and Its Applications

10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00334.x

10.1086/262093

10.1086/591909

Rogerson W. P. On the relationship between historic cost, forward-looking cost and long run marginal cost. (2010) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

Ross S., 2005, Corporate Finance

10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.009

10.1007/BF00134962

Schotter A., 2008, Microeconomics: A Modern Approach

10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.020

10.1017/CBO9780511817434

Warner M. Is America ready to quit coal? New York Times (2009) New York Edition(February 14):BU1

Winning D., 2008, Wall Street Journal

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Management Science

Tập 57 Số 1

21-39

Thông tin tác giả