Captive Breeding, Reintroduction, and the Conservation of Amphibians

Conservation Biology - Tập 22 Số 4 - Trang 852-861 - 2008
Richard A. Griffiths1, Lissette Pavajeau1
1The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, Marlowe Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NR, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

Abstract:  The global amphibian crisis has resulted in renewed interest in captive breeding as a conservation tool for amphibians. Although captive breeding and reintroduction are controversial management actions, amphibians possess a number of attributes that make them potentially good models for such programs. We reviewed the extent and effectiveness of captive breeding and reintroduction programs for amphibians through an analysis of data from the Global Amphibian Assessment and other sources. Most captive breeding and reintroduction programs for amphibians have focused on threatened species from industrialized countries with relatively low amphibian diversity. Out of 110 species in such programs, 52 were in programs with no plans for reintroduction that had conservation research or conservation education as their main purpose. A further 39 species were in programs that entailed captive breeding and reintroduction or combined captive breeding with relocations of wild animals. Nineteen species were in programs with relocations of wild animals only. Eighteen out of 58 reintroduced species have subsequently bred successfully in the wild, and 13 of these species have established self‐sustaining populations. As with threatened amphibians generally, amphibians in captive breeding or reintroduction programs face multiple threats, with habitat loss being the most important. Nevertheless, only 18 out of 58 reintroduced species faced threats that are all potentially reversible. When selecting species for captive programs, dilemmas may emerge between choosing species that have a good chance of surviving after reintroduction because their threats are reversible and those that are doomed to extinction in the wild as a result of irreversible threats. Captive breeding and reintroduction programs for amphibians require long‐term commitments to ensure success, and different management strategies may be needed for species earmarked for reintroduction and species used for conservation research and education.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030719.x

10.1007/978-94-011-0721-1_13

10.1080/03014223.2004.9518366

10.1007/BF00222519

Buley K. R., 1997, The recovery programme for the Mallorcan midwife toad Aytes muletensis: an update, Dodo, 33, 80

Buley K. R., 2000, The Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust and the Mallorcan midwife toad, Alytes muletensis—into the 21st century, Herpetological Bulletin, 72, 17

10.2307/5542

Cooke A. S., 1995, Establishment of populations of the common frog, Rana temporaria, and common toad, Bufo bufo, in a newly created reserve following translocation, Herpetological Journal, 5, 173

10.1111/j.1748-1090.2003.tb02059.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020349.x

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00016.x

10.1525/california/9780520235922.003.0037

Dodd C. K., 1991, Relocation, repatriation and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: are they conservation strategies that work?, Herpetologica, 47, 336

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89176-4

Fellers G. M., 2007, Demise of repatriated populations of mountain yellow‐legged frogs (Rana mucosa) in the Sierra Nevada of California, Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 2, 5

10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00048-3

Gascon C., 2007, Amphibian conservation action plan

10.1023/A:1023391905158

10.1126/science.245.4917.477

Griffiths R. A., 2008, Amphibian conservation: amphibian biology

10.2307/2404906

10.1111/j.1748-1090.2003.tb02060.x

10.1002/zoo.1430140103

IUCN (World Conservation Union), 1998, IUCN guidelines for reintroductions

IUCN (World Conservation Union), 2006, 2006 Red list of threatened species

IUCN (World Conservation Union), Conservation International, and NatureServe, 2006, Global amphibian assessment

10.1017/CBO9780511549984.020

10.3354/esr001001

Leader‐Williams N., 2007, Zoos in the 21st century: catalysts for conservation?, 236

10.1073/pnas.0506889103

10.1126/science.1128396

Mendelson J. R., 2007, Amphibian conservation action plan, 36

10.1002/zoo.1430120404

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00181.x

10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00202-7

Pavajeau L.2005.Captive breeding and release of amphibians.MSc dissertation. DICE University of Kent Canterbury .

10.1126/science.314.5805.1541

10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00105-X

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01275.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020338.x

10.1126/science.1103538

10.1163/157075405774483067

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041142.x

10.1023/A:1019954801089

Zippel K., 2004, Zoos play a vital role in amphibian conservation

Zvirgzds J., 1995, Reintroductions of the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Latvia, Memoranda Society Fauna Flora Fennica, 71, 139

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Biology

Tập 22 Số 4

852-861

Thông tin tác giả