Capitalizing research & development and ‘other information’: the incremental information content of accruals versus cash flows

Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung - Tập 22 - Trang 241-278 - 2011
Tami Dinh Thi1, Wolfgang Schultze2
1School of Accounting, Australian School of Business, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2Department of Accounting and Control, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

This paper studies the role of the accrual process for providing value relevant information on intangibles. Expensing research & development (R&D) expenditures is, by nature, equivalent to cash accounting. Prior studies have found that accrual information has superior explanatory power for market values compared to cash flows (Dechow in J. Account. Econ. 18(1):3–42, 1994). We demonstrate, for a sample of German firms, that this also holds true for R&D accounting. By adjusting the earnings we create two samples reflecting R&D capitalization and expensing, respectively. We demonstrate that capitalizing R&D expenditures creates an additional accrual component of earnings which increases the explanatory power of earnings compared to cash flows (expensing) while internalizing ‘other information’ into the accounting system. This explains the higher value relevance of capitalized R&D compared to expensing established in prior research (Lev and Sougiannis in J. Account. Econ. 21(1):107–138, 1996).

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd edn.). Chichester: Wiley.

Bowen, R. M., Burgstahler, D., & Daley, L. A. (1987). The incremental information content of accrual versus cash flows. The Accounting Review, 62(4), 723–747.

Bryant, L. (2003). Relative value relevance of the successful efforts and full cost accounting methods in the oil and gas industry. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(1), 5–28.

Daley, L. A., & Vigeland, R. L. (1983). The effects of debt covenants and political costs on the choice of accounting methods: The case of accounting for R&D costs. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(1), 195–211.

Ewelt, C., & Knauer, T. (2010). Zum Zielkonflikt der Unternehmenspublizität zu Forschung & Entwicklung – eine empirische Untersuchung der HDAX-Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung, 21(1), 37–58.

Green, J. P., Stark, A. W., & Thomas, H. M. (1996). UK evidence on the market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23(2), 191–216.

Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics (4th edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Hand, J. R. M. (2003). The increasing return-to-scale of intangibles. In J. R. M. Hand & B. Lev (Eds.), Intangibles—values, measures, risks (pp. 303–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1999). Penetrating the book-to-market box: The R&D effect. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(3/4), 419–449.

Möller, H. P., & Hüfner, B. (2002). Zur Bedeutung der Rechnungslegung für den deutschen Aktienmarkt – Begründung, Messprobleme und Erkenntnisse empirischer Forschung. In G. Seicht (Ed.), Österreichisches Jahrbuch für Controlling und Rechnungswesen, Wien (pp. 405–463).

Shi, C. (2002). Accounting for intangibles, earnings variability and analyst’s forecasts: Evidence from the software industry. Working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California.

Wilson, G. P. (1987). The incremental information content of the accrual and funds components of earnings after controlling for earnings. The Accounting Review, 62(2), 293–322.

Wooldridge, J. R. (1988). Competitive decline and corporate restructuring: Is a myopic stock market to blame? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1(1), 26–36.

Zantout, Z. Z., & Tsetsekos, G. P. (1994). The wealth effects of announcements of R&D expenditure increases. The Journal of Financial Research, 17(2), 205–216.