Capacity utilization, factor substitution, and productivity growth in Canadian food processing sector

Agricultural and Food Economics - Tập 10 - Trang 1-16 - 2022
Samuel Gamtessa1
1Department of Economics, University of Regina, Regina, Canada

Tóm tắt

The food processing industry has been confronted with unprecedented challenges as the costs of raw materials have risen rapidly, owing in part to the increased use of grains for ethanol. It is critical to comprehend how these trends affect the industry and potential coping techniques. This study estimates capacity utilization, which is a measurement that is well-suited to identify how input prices affect productivity in the short-run. The results show that capacity utilization decreased significantly after the year 2005 when raw materials input prices skyrocketed. TFP growth has also slowed significantly because of this. According to the estimated elasticities, the industry has little potential to deal with the cost challenge through factor substitution. Another conclusion is that capacity utilization has a positive elasticity with respect to the cost of raw materials. Because it is related to induced capital stock adjustment, which is only achievable in the long run, this is an indicator of how the industry will be affected in the long-run.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson JD, Coble KH (2010) Impact of renewable fuels standard ethanol mandates on the corn market. Agribusiness 26(1):49–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20202 Berndt ER, Hess DM (1986) Measuring and assessing capacity utilization in the manufacturing sectors of nine OECD countries. Eur Econ Rev 30:961–989 Berry ST, Roberts MJ, Schlenker W (2013) Corn Production Shocks in 2012 and Beyond: Implications for Harvest Volatility. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. Blackorby C, Russell RR (1989) Will the real elasticity of substitution please stand up? A comparison of the Allen-Uzawa and Morishima elasticities. Am Econ Rev 79(4):882–888 Congressional Budget Office (2009) The impact of ethanol uses on food prices and greenhouse-gas emissions. CBO. Accessed from http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-2010/reports/04-08-ethanol.pdf Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis. (7th, Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hausman C, Auffhammer M, Berck P (2012) Farm acreage shocks and crop prices: an SVAR approach to understanding the impacts of biofuels. Environ Resour Econ 53(1):117–136 Jorgenso DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1993) Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resour Energy Econ 15(1):7–25 Kennedy C (1964) Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution. Econ J 74:541–547 Kmenta J, Gilbert RF (1968) Small sample properties of alternative estimators of seemingly unrelated regressions. J Am Stat Assoc 63(324):1180–1200 Morrison CJ (1985) Primal and dual capacity utilization: an application to productivity measurement in the US Automobile Industry. J Bus Econ Stat 3(4):312–324 Morrison CJ (1999) Scale economy measures and subequilibrium impacts. J Prod Anal 11:55–66 Morrison CJ (1988) Capacity utilization and productivity measurement: an application to the US automobile industry. In: Färe R (ed) Springer Mueller SA, Anderson JE, Wallington TJ (2011) The impact of biofuel production and other supply and demand factors on food price increases in 2008. Biomass Bioenerg 35(5):1623–1632 Roberts MJ, Schlenker W (2013) Identifying supply and demand elasticities of agricultural commodities: implications for the US ethanol mandate. Am Econ Rev 103(6):2265–2295 Sparling D, Cheney E (2014) The changing face of food manufacturing in Canada: food manufacturing performance. CAPI, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario. Accessed from URL http://www.capi-icpa.ca/proc-food/proc3a.html Sparling D, LeGrow S (2015) The changing face of food manufacturing in Canada: an analysis of plant closings, openings, and investments. CAPI, Ivey School of Business, Western University, London, Ontario. Accessed from David Sparling, Sydney LeGrow: The Changing Face ofhttp://www.capi-icpa.ca/proc-food/proc3b.html The International Council on Clean Transportation (2021) The impact of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on food and feed prices. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/RFS-and-feed-prices-jan2021.pdf; Accessed on November 10, 2021 US EPA (2010) Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory impact analysis US Energy Information Adminstration (2020) U.S. fuel ethanol production capacity increased by 3% in 2019. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45316#.