Can an augmented reality-integrated gamification approach enhance vocational high school students' learning outcomes and motivation in an electronics course?

Cathy Weng1, Khanh Nguyen Phuong Tran1, Chi-Chuan Yang2, Hsuan-I. Huang1, Hsuan Chen1
1Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
2Department of Applied Foreign Languages, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

An augmented reality (AR)-integrated gamification learning approach in an electronics course was developed in this study to help students better understand the concepts while simultaneously increasing their motivation. An experimental study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the AR-integrated gamification approach on students' learning outcomes and motivation. A total of 29 vocational high school students was divided into two groups. The experimental group experienced AR-integrated gamification while the control group adopted conventional gamification. The results indicated that students in the AR-integrated gamification approach outperformed the conventional gamification group in the psychomotor learning outcomes, but no significant difference was found in cognitive and affective domains between the two groups. Concerning learning motivation, the experimental group only performed better intrinsic goal orientation than the control group while the other categories of motivation were insignificant. To compare the pretest and posttest in each group, the experimental group gained higher posttest scores in all domains of learning outcomes than the pretest scores after the intervention, but the control group only improved cognitive and psychomotor domains. Regarding learning motivation, the proposed approach pointed out the better posttest scores in all components compared to the pretest scores in the experimental group while only the posttest scores of extrinsic goal orientation, task value, and control beliefs about learning were higher than the pretest scores in the control group. The practical implications and recommendations for future work are presented.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054 Alawadhi, A., Abu-Ayyash, E.A.S. (2021). Students’ perceptions of Kahoot!: An exploratory mixed-method study in EFL undergraduate classrooms in the UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3629–3658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10425-8 Alcácer, V., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2019). Scanning the industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Engineering science and technology, an international journal, 22(3), 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006 Altmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—Theoretical background and empirical results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900 Awuor, N. O., Weng, C., Matere, I. M., Chen, J.-H., Puspitasari, D., & Nguyen Phuong Tran, K. (2022). The effect of 3D-stereogram mobile AR on engineering drawing course outcomes among first-year vocational high schoolers with different spatial abilities: a Bloom’s taxonomy perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2158477 Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc. Bootzin, R. R., & McKnight, P. E. (2006). Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2022). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617 Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. C. (2019). Tablet-based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12718 Carreira, J. M., Ozaki, K., & Maeda, T. (2013). Motivational model of English learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 41(3), 706–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.017 Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007 Chen, S. C., & Li, Z. W. (2009). Electronics practice. Taiwan: TKDBOOKS Co. Ltd. Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Employing augmented-reality-embedded instruction to disperse the imparities of individual differences in earth science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835–847. Chen, J. Z. (2014). Development and evaluation of an AR-assisted computer hardware assembly on skills learning for vocational high school students [Master’s thesis, University of Taipei]. National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 449–462. Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365. Çolak, A. B., Güzel, T., Yıldız, O., & Özer, M. (2021). An experimental study on determination of the shottky diode current-voltage characteristic depending on temperature with artificial neural network. Physica b: Condensed Matter, 608, 412852. Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Boston, MA. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Motivation and self-determination in human behavior. NY: Plenum Publishing Co. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020 Du, X., Naji, K. K., Ebead, U., & Ma, J. (2021). Engineering instructors’ professional agency development and identity renegotiation through engaging in pedagogical change towards PBL. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1832444 Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22. Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In J. M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. Elen & M. J. Bishop (eds), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). Springer, New York. Echeverría, A., Améstica, M., Gil, F., Nussbaum, M., Barrios, E., & Leclerc, S. (2012). Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative games in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.027 Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students’ academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12350 Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M., García, S., & Barcia, J. (2015). ARBOOK: Development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119–124. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Garcia-Sanjuan, F., Jurdi, S., Jaen, J., & Nacher, V. (2018). Evaluating a tactile and a tangible multi-tablet gamified quiz system for collaborative learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 123, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.011 Gargrish, S., Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Sharma, B. (2021). Measuring effectiveness of augmented reality-based geometry learning assistant on memory retention abilities of the students in 3D geometry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424 Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. Ghanizadeh, A., Razavi, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). Technology-enhanced language learning (TELL): A review of resourses and upshots. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 54, 73–87. Gibson, D., Ostashewski, N., Flintoff, K., Grant, S., & Knight, E. (2015). Digital badges in education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 403–410. Gutiérrez, J. M., & Fernández, M. D. M. (2014). Applying augmented reality in engineering education to improve academic performance & student motivation. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(3), 625–635. Hamari, J., & Eranti, V. (2011). Framework for designing and evaluating game achievements. In C. Marinka, K. Helen, & W. Annika, Eds, Proceedings of the DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play, Hilversum, The Netherlands. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179. Hsu, Y. S., Lin, Y. H., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–14. Huang, M. Y., Shih, K. T., Lin, H. H., & Chen, C. H. (2006). Implementation of the information technology instruction into students' learning motivation and movement skill performance of physical education. In L.M. Hsu (Ed.), Special issue of the 95th annual sports academic symposium for universities and colleges of the republic of china (pp. 110-115). Taipei City: ROC College Athletic Federation. https://doi.org/10.6695/AUES.200604_95.0020 Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3), 163–174. Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). What is gamification in learning and education? In Gamification in learning and education (pp. 25–38). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47283-6 Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: affective domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc. Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327. Liu, W., Cheok, A. D., Mei-Ling, C. L., & Theng, Y. L. (2007). Mixed reality classroom: learning from entertainment. In K. K. W. Wong (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international conference on digital interactive media in entertainment and arts (DIMEA’07) (pp. 65–72). NY: ACM Press. López-Faican, L., & Jaen, J. (2020). EmoFindAR: Evaluation of a mobile multiplayer augmented reality game for primary school children. Computers & Education, 149, 103814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103814 Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019). Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 134, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.002 Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2009.11.003 Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. Meyer, O. A., Omdahl, M. K., & Makransky, G. (2019). Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment. Computers & Education, 140, 103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103603 Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620001 Nah, F. F. H., Zeng, Q., Telaprolu, V. R., Ayyappa, A. P., & Eschenbrenner, B. (2014). Gamification of education: A review of literature. In D. Hutchison, T. Kanade, J. Kittler, J. M. Kleinberg, A. Kobsa, F. Mattern, & F. F. H. Nah (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science. HCIB 2014: HCI in business (pp. 401–409). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_39 Ortiz-Rojas, M., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2019). Gamification through leaderboards: An empirical study in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(4), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.12116 Otter, S. (1992). Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Development Project Report. London: UDACE. Ozdemir, M., Sahin, C., Arcagok, S., & Demir, M. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality applications in the learning process: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(74), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.9 Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement, (pp. 149–172). Boston: Springer US Ryan, K., & Cousins, J. B. (2009). The SAGE international handbook of educational evaluation. California: Sage Publications. Ryan, R. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2009). Self-determination theory in schools of education: Can an empirically supported framework also be critical and liberating? Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104 Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Higher Ed. Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: Gryphon House. Singh, G., Mantri, A., Sharma, O., Dutta, R., & Kaur, R. (2019). Evaluating the impact of the augmented reality learning environment on electronics laboratory skills of engineering students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(6), 1361–1375. Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013 Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (2nd edition). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon Strzys, M. P., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Klein, P., Lukowicz, P., Knierim, P., Schmidt, A., & Kuhn, J. (2018). Physics holo. lab learning experience: using smartglasses for augmented reality labwork to foster the concepts of heat conduction. European Journal of Physics, 39(3), 035703. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aaa8fb Stull, A. T., Gainer, M. J., & Hegarty, M. (2018). Learning by enacting: The role of embodiment in chemistry education. Learning and Instruction, 55, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.008 Sukardjo, M., Khasanah, U., & Rahman, F. (2021). Development of basic electronic practices module in vocational schools. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(1), 64–71. Uz Bilgin, C., & Gul, A. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of gamification on group cohesion, attitude, and academic achievement in collaborative learning environments. TechTrends, 64(1), 124–136. Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217–227. Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning–A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818 Wang, X., Kim, M. J., Love, P. E., & Kang, S. C. (2013). Augmented Reality in built environment: Classification and implications for future research. Automation in Construction, 32, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.021 Weng, C., Rathinasabapathi, A., Weng, A., & Zagita, C. (2019). Mixed reality in science education as a learning support: A revitalized science book. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 777–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/073563311875701 Weng, C., Otanga, S., Christianto, S. M., & Chu, R. J. C. (2020). Enhancing students’ biology learning by using augmented reality as a learning supplement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119884 Weng, C., Puspitasari, D., Tran, K. N. P., Feng, P. J., Awuor, N. O., & Matere, I. M. (2021). The effect of using theodolite 3D AR in teaching measurement error on learning outcomes and satisfaction of civil engineering students with different spatial ability. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1898989 Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 Yip, J., Wong, S. H., Yick, K. L., Chan, K., & Wong, K. H. (2019). Improving quality of teaching and learning in classes by using augmented reality video. Computers & Education, 128, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.014 Yohannes, A., Chen, H. L., & Chang, C. C. (2023). Effect of an interactive e-book on middle school students' mathematics reading and spatial ability. Educational technology research and development, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10225-0 Zhang, Q., & Yu, Z. (2021). A literature review on the influence of Kahoot! On learning outcomes, interaction, and collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4507–4535. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.