CMR trong đặc trưng cơ tim ở bệnh lý tim thiếu máu cục bộ: công nghệ tiên tiến và phát triển trong tương lai
Tóm tắt
Bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ và những hệ lụy của nó là một trong những nguyên nhân chính gây ra tình trạng bệnh tật và tử vong trên toàn thế giới. Trong những thập kỷ qua, các phát triển công nghệ đã củng cố vai trò của hình ảnh không xâm lấn trong việc phát hiện, phân loại nguy cơ và quản lý bệnh nhân mắc bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ. Hình ảnh cộng hưởng từ tim (CMR) kết hợp cả đặc trưng chức năng và hình thái của tim để xác định sự hiện diện, tính cấp tính và mức độ nghiêm trọng của bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ thông qua việc đánh giá chuyển động và chức năng của cơ tim, sự hiện diện và mức độ phù nề cơ tim, thiếu máu và sẹo. Các quy trình lâm sàng hiện tại đã chứng minh giá trị chẩn đoán và tiên lượng của chúng. Tuy nhiên, có những công nghệ hình ảnh mới nổi cung cấp thông tin bổ sung dựa trên định lượng tinh vi của các dấu ấn hình ảnh và độ chính xác chẩn đoán cao hơn, do đó có khả năng cho phép giảm hoặc tránh sử dụng thuốc cản quang và/hoặc tác nhân gây căng thẳng. Mục tiêu của bài đánh giá này là tóm tắt tình trạng công nghệ hiện tại của hình ảnh CMR cho bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ và cung cấp những cái nhìn về các phát triển hứa hẹn trong tương lai.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Steg PG, James SK, Atar D et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215
Jennings RB, Ganote CE (1974) Structural changes in myocardium during acute ischemia. Circ Res 35(Suppl 3):156–172
Basuk WL, Reimer KA, Jennings RB (1986) Effect of repetitive brief episodes of ischemia on cell volume, electrolytes and ultrastructure. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:33A–41A. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80026-2
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2019) Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Russ J Cardiol 24:107–138. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-3-107-138
Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM et al (2017) Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2 and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imagin. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8
Eitel I, de Waha S, Wöhrle J et al (2014) Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1194
Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-35
Kloner RA (2020) Stunned and Hibernating Myocardium: Where Are We Nearly 4 Decades Later? J Am Heart Assoc 9:e015502. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015502
Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2020) Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6
Carità P, Corrado E, Pontone G et al (2016) Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insights from multimodality imaging and electrocardiography. A brief review. Int J Cardiol 225:402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.037
Pontone G, Guaricci AI, Andreini D et al (2016) Prognostic Benefit of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Over Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment of Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients Referred for the Evaluation of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator T. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004956
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C et al (2020) Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1
Vermersch M, Longère B, Coisne A et al (2020) Compressed sensing real-time cine imaging for assessment of ventricular function, volumes and mass in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 30:609–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06341-2
Ibrahim E-SH (2011) Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques--pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-36
Claus P, Omar AMS, Pedrizzetti G et al (2015) Tissue Tracking Technology for Assessing Cardiac Mechanics: Principles, Normal Values, and Clinical Applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1444–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.001
Karthikeyan B, Sonkawade SD, Pokharel S et al (2020) Tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging to quantify regional mechanical changes after acute myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Imaging 66:208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.09.010
Roujol S, Weingärtner S, Foppa M et al (2014) Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility of Four T1 Mapping Sequences: A Head-to-Head Comparison of MOLLI, ShMOLLI, SASHA, and SAPPHIRE. Radiology 140296. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140296
Mghaieth Zghal F, Boudiche S, Haboubi S et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of strain imaging in predicting myocardial viability after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Medicine (Baltimore) 99:e19528. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019528
Stathogiannis K, Mor-Avi V, Rashedi N et al (2020) Regional myocardial strain by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for detection of scar in ischemic heart disease. Magn Reson Imaging 68:190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2020.02.009
Elias J, van Dongen IM, Hoebers LP et al (2020) Recovery and prognostic value of myocardial strain in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with a concurrent chronic total occlusion. Eur Radiol 30:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06338-x
Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Lange T et al (2018) Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking for Optimized Prediction of Cardiovascular Events Following Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:1433–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.034
Nucifora G, Muser D, Tioni C et al (2018) Prognostic value of myocardial deformation imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking in patients with a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 271:387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.082
Romano S, Romer B, Evans K et al (2020) Prognostic Implications of Blunted Feature-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain During Vasodilator Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress Imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.002
Barreiro-Pérez M, Curione D, Symons R et al (2018) Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms. Eur Radiol 28:5137–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5538-4
Mantilla J, Paredes J, Bellanger J-J et al (2015) Classification of LV wall motion in cardiac MRI using kernel Dictionary Learning with a parametric approach. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf 2015:7292–7295. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320075
Ruijsink B, Puyol-Antón E, Oksuz I et al (2020) Fully Automated, Quality-Controlled Cardiac Analysis From CMR: Validation and Large-Scale Application to Characterize Cardiac Function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:684–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.05.030
Bai W, Sinclair M, Tarroni G et al (2018) Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0471-x
Lowe JE, Reimer KA, Jennings RB (1978) Experimental infarct size as a function of the amount of myocardium at risk. Am J Pathol 90:363–379
Reimer KA, Jennings RB (1979) The “wavefront phenomenon” of myocardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk) and collateral flow. Lab Investig 40:633–644
de Waha S, Eitel I, Desch S et al (2014) Prognosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A study on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical routine. Trials 15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-249
Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ et al (1983) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am J Cardiol 52:184–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(83)90093-0
Eitel I, Friedrich MG (2011) T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-13
Dall'Armellina E, Karia N, Lindsay AC et al (2011) Dynamic Changes of Edema and Late Gadolinium Enhancement After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Their Relationship to Functional Recovery and Salvage Index. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.963421
Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S et al (2011) Direct T2 Quantification of Myocardial Edema in Acute Ischemic Injury. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.09.023
McCann GP, Khan JN, Greenwood JP et al (2015) Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:2713–2724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099
Ubachs JFA, Sörensson P, Engblom H et al (2012) Myocardium at risk by magnetic resonance imaging: head-to-head comparison of T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes091
Nordlund D, Heiberg E, Carlsson M et al (2016) Extent of Myocardium at Risk for Left Anterior Descending Artery, Right Coronary Artery, and Left Circumflex Artery Occlusion Depicted by Contrast-Enhanced Steady State Free Precession and T2-Weighted Short Tau Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imagin. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:e004376. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004376
Hansen ESS, Pedersen SF, Pedersen SB et al (2019) Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury. Int J Card Imaging 35:1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01569-x
Moon JC, Messroghli DR, Kellman P et al (2013) Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-92
Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E et al (2012) Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-42
Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S et al (2004) Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magn Reson Med 52:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20110
Piechnik SK, Ferreira VM, Dall’Armellina E et al (2010) Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-69
Chow K, Flewitt JA, Green JD et al (2014) Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping. Magn Reson Med 71:2082–2095. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24878
Weingärtner S, Akçakaya M, Basha T et al (2014) Combined saturation/inversion recovery sequences for improved evaluation of scar and diffuse fibrosis in patients with arrhythmia or heart rate variability. Magn Reson Med 71:1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24761
Robson MD, Piechnik SK, Tunnicliffe EM, Neubauer S (2013) T1 measurements in the human myocardium: the effects of magnetization transfer on the SASHA and MOLLI sequences. Magn Reson Med 70:664–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24867
McNamara MT, Higgins CB, Schechtmann N et al (1985) Detection and characterization of acute myocardial infarction in man with use of gated magnetic resonance. Circulation 71:717–724. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.71.4.717
Giri S, Chung Y-C, Merchant A et al (2009) T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-56
van Heeswijk RB, Feliciano H, Bongard C et al (2012) Free-breathing 3 T magnetic resonance T2-mapping of the heart. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.010
Sprinkart AM, Luetkens JA, Träber F et al (2015) Gradient Spin Echo (GraSE) imaging for fast myocardial T2 mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0127-z
Ugander M, Bagi PS, Oki AJ et al (2012) Myocardial edema as detected by pre-contrast T1 and T2 CMR delineates area at risk associated with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:596–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.016
Goldfarb JW, Arnold S, Han J (2007) Recent myocardial infarction: assessment with unenhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 245:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451061590
Bulluck H, White SK, Rosmini S et al (2015) T1 mapping and T2 mapping at 3T for quantifying the area-at-risk in reperfused STEMI patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0173-6
Dall’Armellina E, Piechnik SK, Ferreira VM et al (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance by non contrast T1-mapping allows assessment of severity of injury in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-15
Zia MI, Ghugre NR, Connelly KA et al (2012) Characterizing myocardial edema and hemorrhage using quantitative T2 and T2* mapping at multiple time intervals post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973222
Suranyi P, Elgavish GA, Schoepf UJ et al (2018) Myocardial tissue characterization by combining late gadolinium enhancement imaging and percent edema mapping: a novel T2 map-based MRI method in canine myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol Exp 2:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0037-6
Captur G, Bhandari A, Brühl R et al (2020) T(1) mapping performance and measurement repeatability: results from the multi-national T(1) mapping standardization phantom program (T1MES). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00613-3
Giannini F, Palmisano A, Baldetti L et al (2019) Patterns of Regional Myocardial Perfusion Following Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation: Insights by Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 12:e009148
Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K et al (2008) Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-10-18
Thomson LEJ, Wei J, Agarwal M et al (2015) Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002481
Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF et al (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet (London, England) 379:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4
Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S et al (2001) Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 103:2230–2235. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.18.2230
Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP et al (2019) Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med 380:2418–2428. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716734
Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Nagel E (2009) Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance. Curr Heart Fail Rep 6:142–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-009-0021-9
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W et al (1999) Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 99:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.6.763
Hundley WG, Morgan TM, Neagle CM et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis. Circulation 106:2328–2333. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000036017.46437.02
Korosoglou G, Elhmidi Y, Steen H et al (2010) Prognostic value of high-dose dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging in 1,493 consecutive patients: assessment of myocardial wall motion and perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.020
Kotecha T, Martinez-Naharro A, Boldrini M et al (2019) Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:1958–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.022
Kellman P, Hansen MS, Nielles-Vallespin S et al (2017) Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0355-5
Knott KD, Seraphim A, Augusto JB et al (2020) The Prognostic Significance of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion: An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach Using Perfusion Mapping. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.119.044666
Engblom H, Xue H, Akil S et al (2017) Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0388-9
Scannell CM, Veta M, Villa ADM et al (2020) Deep-Learning-Based Preprocessing for Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 51:1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26983
Milidonis X, Nazir MS, Schneider T et al (2020) Pixel-wise assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion using a cardiac phantom mimicking transmural myocardial perfusion gradients. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28296
Korosoglou G, Lehrke S, Wochele A et al (2010) Strain-encoded CMR for the detection of inducible ischemia during intermediate stress. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.015
Schneeweis C, Qiu J, Schnackenburg B et al (2014) Value of additional strain analysis with feature tracking in dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detecting coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-014-0072-2
Schuster A, Paul M, Bettencourt N et al (2015) Myocardial feature tracking reduces observer-dependence in low-dose dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance. PLoS One 10:e0122858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122858
Craven TP, Tsao CW, La Gerche A et al (2020) Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Development, current utility and future applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00652-w
Rerkpattanapipat P, Gandhi SK, Darty SN et al (2003) Feasibility to detect severe coronary artery stenoses with upright treadmill exercise magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 92:603–606 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00734-3
Raman SV, Dickerson JA, Jekic M et al (2010) Real-time cine and myocardial perfusion with treadmill exercise stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients referred for stress SPECT. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-41
Sukpraphrute B, Drafts BC, Rerkpattanapipat P et al (2015) Prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance upright maximal treadmill exercise testing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0208-z
Raman SV, Dickerson JA, Mazur W et al (2016) Diagnostic Performance of Treadmill Exercise Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: The Prospective, Multicenter Exercise CMR’s Accuracy for Cardiovascular Stress Testing (EXACT) Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 5. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003811
Piechnik SK, Neubauer S, Ferreira VM (2018) State-of-the-art review: stress T1 mapping-technical considerations, pitfalls and emerging clinical applications. MAGMA 31:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-017-0649-5
Dongworth RK, Campbell-Washburn AE, Cabrera-Fuentes HA et al (2017) Quantifying the area-at-risk of myocardial infarction in-vivo using arterial spin labeling cardiac magnetic resonance. Sci Rep 7:2271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02544-z
Do HP, Ramanan V, Qi X et al (2018) Non-contrast assessment of microvascular integrity using arterial spin labeled cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0468-5
Javed A, Nayak KS (2020) Single-shot EPI for ASL-CMR. Magn Reson Med 84:738–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28165
Kober F, Jao T, Troalen T, Nayak KS (2016) Myocardial arterial spin labeling. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0235-4
Friedrich MG, Karamitsos TD (2013) Oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-43
Guensch DP, Fischer K, Flewitt JA et al (2014) Breathing manoeuvre-dependent changes in myocardial oxygenation in healthy humans. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15:409–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet171
Fischer K, Yamaji K, Luescher S et al (2018) Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to detect oxygenation deficits in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease triggered by breathing maneuvers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0446-y
van den Boomen M, Manhard MK, Snel GJH et al (2020) Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MRI of the Myocardium with Multiecho Gradient-Echo Spin-Echo Imaging. Radiology 294:538–545. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191845
Varga-Szemes A, van der Geest RJ, Spottiswoode BS et al (2016) Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Accuracy of T1 Mapping-based Synthetic Inversion-Recovery Imaging. Radiology 278:374–382. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150162
Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al (1999) Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100:1992–2002. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.19.1992
Schwitter J, Arai AE (2011) Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 32:799–809. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq481
Karamitsos TD, Dall’Armellina E, Choudhury RP, Neubauer S (2011) Ischemic heart disease: comprehensive evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 162:16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.011
Ibrahim T, Bülow HP, Hackl T et al (2007) Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.047
McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK et al (2003) Differentiation of Heart Failure Related to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Coronary Artery Disease Using Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 108:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000078641.19365.4C
Lee S-A, Yoon YE, Kim J-E et al (2016) Long-Term Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Am J Cardiol 118:1647–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.043
Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al (2000) The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Reversible Myocardial Dysfunction. N Engl J Med 343:1445–1453. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200011163432003
Mastrodicasa D, Elgavish GA, Schoepf UJ et al (2018) Nonbinary quantification technique accounting for myocardial infarct heterogeneity: Feasibility of applying percent infarct mapping in patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25973
Varga-Szemes A, van der Geest RJ, Schoepf UJ et al (2016) MRI Post-Processing Methods for Myocardial Infarct Quantification. Curr Radiol Rep 4:30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-016-0159-7
Flett AS, Hasleton J, Cook C et al (2011) Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.11.015
Fröhlich GM, Meier P, White SK et al (2013) Myocardial reperfusion injury: looking beyond primary PCI. Eur Heart J 34:1714–1722. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht090
Robbers LFHJ, Eerenberg ES, Teunissen PFA et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging-defined areas of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction represent microvascular destruction and haemorrhage. Eur Heart J 34:2346–2353. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht100
Stone GW, Selker HP, Thiele H et al (2016) Relationship Between Infarct Size and Outcomes Following Primary PCI: Patient-Level Analysis From 10 Randomized Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:1674–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.069
Gerber BL, Rochitte CE, Melin JA et al (2000) Microvascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 101:2734–2741. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.23.2734
Pontone G, Guaricci AI, Andreini D et al (2017) Prognostic Stratification of Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PROSPECT): A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006428
Ørn S, Manhenke C, Greve OJ et al (2009) Microvascular obstruction is a major determinant of infarct healing and subsequent left ventricular remodelling following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 30:1978–1985. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp219
Kim HW, Rehwald WG, Jenista ER et al (2018) Dark-Blood Delayed Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance of Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:1758–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.021
Muscogiuri G, Rehwald WG, Schoepf UJ et al (2017) T(Rho) and magnetization transfer and INvErsion recovery (TRAMINER)-prepared imaging: A novel contrast-enhanced flow-independent dark-blood technique for the evaluation of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement in patients with myocardial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:1429–1437. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25498
Kellman P, Xue H, Olivieri LJ et al (2016) Dark blood late enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0297-3
Holtackers RJ, Chiribiri A, Schneider T et al (2017) Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement without additional magnetization preparation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0372-4
Holtackers RJ, Van De Heyning CM, Nazir MS et al (2019) Clinical value of dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance without additional magnetization preparation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 21:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0556-1
Puntmann VO, Peker E, Chandrashekhar Y, Nagel E (2016) T1 Mapping in Characterizing Myocardial Disease. Circ Res 119:277 LP–277299
Puntmann VO, Carr-White G, Jabbour A et al (2018) Native T1 and ECV of Noninfarcted Myocardium and Outcome in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:766–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.020
Bulluck H, Rosmini S, Abdel-Gadir A et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of T(1) and T(2) mapping to detect intramyocardial hemorrhage in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:877–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25638
Montesi SB, Désogère P, Fuchs BC, Caravan P (2019) Molecular imaging of fibrosis: recent advances and future directions. J Clin Invest 129:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI122132
Caravan P, Das B, Dumas S et al (2007) Collagen-targeted MRI contrast agent for molecular imaging of fibrosis. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng 46:8171–8173. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200700700
Helm PA, Caravan P, French BA et al (2008) Postinfarction myocardial scarring in mice: molecular MR imaging with use of a collagen-targeting contrast agent. Radiology 247:788–796. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473070975
Sosnovik DE, Garanger E, Aikawa E et al (2009) Molecular MRI of cardiomyocyte apoptosis with simultaneous delayed-enhancement MRI distinguishes apoptotic and necrotic myocytes in vivo: potential for midmyocardial salvage in acute ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:460–467. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.859678
Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, Chen JW et al (2008) Activatable magnetic resonance imaging agent reports myeloperoxidase activity in healing infarcts and noninvasively detects the antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation 117:1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756510
Protti A, Lavin B, Dong X et al (2015) Assessment of Myocardial Remodeling Using an Elastin/Tropoelastin Specific Agent with High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). J Am Heart Assoc 4:e001851. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.001851