CHOP and AP-1 cooperatively mediate PUMA expression during lipoapoptosis

Sophie C. Cazanave1, Nafisa A. Elmi2, Yuko Akazawa2, Steven F. Bronk2, Justin L. Mott3,2, Gregory J. Gores2
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3Biochemistry & Molecular Biology,

Tóm tắt

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated apoptosis is a key feature of hepatocyte cytotoxicity by saturated free fatty acids (FFA). This lipoapoptosis is dependent, in part, on the transcriptional upregulation of the BH3-only protein PUMA (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis). Although the activator protein (AP)-1 complex facilitates PUMA expression by saturated FFA, the transcription factor CAAT/enhancer binding homologous protein (CHOP) is also induced by ER stress and promotes apoptosis. To integrate the role of these two transcription factors in ER stress-induced apoptosis, we examined the relative contribution of CHOP and AP-1 in mediating PUMA induction by saturated FFA. Our results demonstrate that short-hairpin RNA-targeted knockdown of CHOP attenuates palmitate-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Loss of CHOP induction also reduced the increase in PUMA mRNA and protein levels as well as Bax activation by palmitate. No functional CHOP binding sites were identified in the PUMA promoter sequence. Rather, we observed that CHOP physically interacts with the AP-1 complex protein c-Jun upon palmitate treatment, and a CHOP:phosphorylated c-Jun heteromeric complex binds to the AP-1 consensus binding sequence within the PUMA promoter region. Finally, loss of function studies suggest that both transcription factors are necessary for maximal PUMA induction. Collectively, these data suggest that CHOP and AP-1 cooperatively mediate PUMA induction during hepatocyte lipoapoptosis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.014

10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.003

10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.10.x

10.1074/jbc.M704391200

10.1056/NEJMoa060326

10.1074/jbc.M109.022491

10.1002/jnr.21292

10.1242/jcs.026062

10.1002/hep.21327

10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00907-7

10.1083/jcb.200809153

10.1074/jbc.272.21.13829

10.1097/01.alc.0000174691.03751.11

10.1002/hep.23253

10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.030

10.1007/s10495-009-0352-8

10.1074/jbc.M509868200

10.3390/ijms9060978

10.1136/gut.2006.118059

10.1074/jbc.M510660200

10.1074/jbc.M109.039545

10.1172/JCI0214550

10.1038/sj.cdd.4401373

10.1073/pnas.191207498

10.1152/ajpendo.00642.2009

10.1371/journal.pone.0005468

10.1002/hep.21763

10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.039

10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.027

10.1002/hep.21391

10.1083/jcb.200305149

Richieri GV, 1995, J Lipid Res, 36, 229, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)39899-0

10.1053/gast.2001.23256

10.1073/pnas.87.7.2466

10.1128/MCB.19.11.7589

10.1016/S1388-1981(02)00342-6

10.1210/en.2005-0570

10.1007/s11010-009-0142-1

10.1152/ajpendo.00644.2005

10.1074/jbc.M406933200

10.1038/nrm2308

10.1091/mbc.E08-11-1109

10.1101/gad.12.7.982