Building a major transport infrastructure in Hong Kong in the historical context of the 1997 retrocession

Emerald - Tập 3 Số 2 - Trang 168-180 - 2008
YvonDufour1, PeterSteane2, LawrenceWong3
1Graduate School of Management, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
2School of Management, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta, Australia
3Graduate School of Management, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to look into the fate of a troubled initiative in one of Hong Kong's economic engines – the container handling industry – that was developed in the midst of the discussions between Beijing and London leading towards the historical 1997 handover.Design/methodology/approachBased on a qualitative in‐depth analysis of a longitudinal case study, the impact of the historical context is shown.FindingsThe data suggest that the forecasting gaps are residual of prolonged decision‐making processes featuring a diversity of stakeholders pursuing their respective agendas and making the best of the opportunities presented by powerful contextual events such as the historical 1997 restoration.Research limitations/implicationsA few aspects of the forecasting process make a difference in the likelihood that the traffic forecasts will prove more accurate: improving the interconnectedness of the forecasting tasks; eliminating the problem of assumption drag; and developing knowledge in sociopolitical forecasting.Originality/valueThe value of this longitudinal case study lies in showing that major transport infrastructure forecasts are neither a deceptive nor meaningless series of projections to cool down potential opposition, as argued by the proponents of the political approach. Building a major transport infrastructure takes place through a nest of multifarious and unpredictable processes, intertwined with patterns of other strategic decisions and actions undertaken either by the public or by the private organizations involved, and influenced by major contingencies and historical contextual events over time.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ascher, W. (1978), Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy‐Makers and Planners, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

Cheng, L.K. and Wong, Y.C.R. (1997), Port Facilities and Container Handling Services, City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong.

Coeck, C., Notteboom, T., Verbeke, A. and Winkelmans, W. (1996), “Back to the future: an evaluation of traffic forecasting techniques used in Antwerp and Rotterdam”, in Winkelmans, W. and Notteboom, T. (Eds), The Issue of Prognoses in Maritime Transport and Seaport Production in Belgium and Poland: A Conceptual and Empirical Study, Garant, Leuven, pp. 3‐26.

Durand, R. (2003), “Predicting a firm's forecasting ability: the roles of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 821‐38.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2003a), “Machiavellian tunnel”, World Tunnelling, March, p. 43.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2003b), “The lying game”, EuroBusiness, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 60‐2.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2004a), “Misrepresentation drives projects”, Engineering News‐Record, 5 January, p. 87.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2004b), “Procedure for dealing with optimism bias in transport planning – guidance document”, The British Department for Transport, June.

Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M.K. and Buhl, S. (2006), “Inaccuracy in traffic forecasts”, Transport Reviews, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1‐24.

Hogarth, R.M. and Makridakis, S. (1981), “Forecasting and planning: an evaluation”, Management Science,, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 115‐38.

Lovallo, D. and Kahnman, D. (2003), “Delusions of success: how optimism undermines executive decisions”, HBR, OnPoint Enhanced edition, July, pp. 4‐11.

Makridakis, S. and Gapa, A. (1998), “Judgment: its role and value for strategy”, in Wright, G. and Goodwin, P. (Eds), Forecasting with Judgment, Wiley, New York, NY.

Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S.C. and Hyndman, R.J. (1998), Forecasting Methods and Applications, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, NY.

Miller, D. (1987), “The genesis of configuration”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 686‐701.

Miller, D. (1996), “Configurations revisited”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 505‐12.

Miller, D. (1999), “Note on the study of configurations”, Management International Review, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 27‐37.

Miller, D. and Friesen, P. (1982), “Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 591‐614.

Pettigrew, A.M. (1985), The Awakening Giant – Continuity and Change in ICI, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978), The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper and Row, New York, NY.

Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N. and Rothenatter, W. (2003a), Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M.K. and Buhl, S. (2003b), “How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?”, Transport Reviews, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 71‐88.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 3 Số 2

168-180

Thông tin tác giả