Bridging gaps: a systematic literature review of brokerage in educational change

References included in the analysis are marked with an asterisk (*). American Heritage Dictionary. (2020). The American heritage dictionary of the English language. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company. https://ahdictionary.com/ Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4 *Brown, C. (2020). What is the research brokerage role that can be played by social relationships? Learning from a quantitative study from England. In J. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 108–122). New York: Routledge. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2011). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in sociology of education (pp. 127–162). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1576-9_7 Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432 Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carboni, I., & Gilman, R. (2012). Brokers at risk: Gender differences in the effects of structural position on social stress and life satisfaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028753 *Carmichael, P., Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R., & Honour, L. (2006). Teachers’ networks in and out of school. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615729 *Chang, E. (2020). Digital meritocracy: Intermediary organizations and the construction of policy knowledge. Educational Policy, 34(5), 760–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818802116 Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2015). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press. *Cooper, A. (2012). Knowledge mobilization intermediaries in education: A cross-case analysis of 44 Canadian organizations [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. TSpace Repository. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/32688 *Cooper, A., Rodway, J., MacGregor, S., Shewchuk, S., & Searle, M. (2020). Knowledge brokering: Not a place for novices or new conscripts. In J. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 90–107). New York: Routledge. *Cooper, J. (2019). Mathematicians and teachers sharing perspectives on teaching whole number arithmetic: Boundary-crossing in professional development. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0995-4 *Corbin, B., McNamara, O., & Williams, J. (2003). Numeracy coordinators: ‘Brokering’ change within and between communities of practice? British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(4), 344–368. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8527.2003.00243.x Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2007). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York: Routledge. Crossley, N., Bellotti, E., Edwards, G., Everett, M. G., Koskinen, J., & Tranmer, M. (2015). Social network analysis for ego-nets: Social network analysis for actor-centred networks. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9. Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 39–79. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210368990 *Daly, A. J., Finnigan, K. S., Jordan, S., Moolenaar, N. M., & Che, J. (2014a). Misalignment and perverse incentives: Examining the politics of district leaders as brokers in the use of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813513149 *Daly, A. J., Finnigan, K. S., Moolenaar, N. M., & Che, J. (2014b). The critical role of brokers in the access and use of evidence at the school and district level. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill (pp. 13–31). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04690-7_3 *Davidson, K. L., & Penuel, W. R. (2020). The role of brokers in sustaining partnership work in education. In J. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 154–167). New York: Routledge. DuFour, R. B. (2003). Central office support for learning communities. School Administrator, 60(5), 15–16. *Durand, F. T., Lawson, H. A., Wilcox, K. C., & Schiller, K. S. (2015). The role of district office leaders in the adoption and implementation of the Common Core State Standards in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15615391 Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33 *Fahy, E., & Kenny, A. (2022). ‘Bridging the gap’: The role of an arts broker in supporting partnerships with teachers. Arts Education Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2022.2037483 *Farley-Ripple, E. (2019). What is research brokerage and why does it matter? A report from the Center for Research Use in Education. University of Delaware. https://www.research4schools.org/what-is-research-brokerage-and-why-does-it-matter/ Farley-Ripple, E., & Grajeda, S. (2020). Avenues of Influence: An exploration of school-based practitioners as knowledge brokers and mobilizers. In J. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 65–89). New York: Routledge. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543 Fullan, M. (2016). The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9289-1 Gentemann, K. M., & Whitehead, T. L. (1983). The cultural broker concept in bicultural education. Journal of Negro Education, 52(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295029 Giudici, A. (2021). Teacher politics bottom-up: Theorising the impact of micro-politics on policy generation. Journal of Education Policy, 36(6), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1730976 Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.2307/270949 Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (2014). International handbook of educational change: Part two (Vol. 5). New York: Springer. Harris, A., Jones, M., Ismail, N., & Nguyen, D. (2019) Middle leaders and middle leadership in schools: Exploring the knowledge base (2003–2017). School Leadership & Management, 39(3–4), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578738 *Hashim, A. K. (2020). Coaching and districtwide improvement: Exploring the systemic leadership practices of instructional coaches. Teachers College Record, 122(10), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201005 Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498032000153025 Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Mixed methods research synthesis: Definition, framework, and potential. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9538-6 Honig, M. I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737028004357 Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016 Honig, M. I., & Ikemoto, G. (2008). Adaptive assistance for learning improvement efforts: The case of the Institute for Learning. Peabody Journal of Education, 83, 328–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560802222327 *Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., Jakopovic, P., & Heaton, R. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics: Formal structure and teacher leadership. Elementary School Journal, 114(2), 200–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/671935 *Hopkins, M., Weddle, H., Gluckman, M., & Gautsch, L. (2019). Boundary crossing in a professional association: The dynamics of research use among state leaders and researchers in a research-practice partnership. AERA Open, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419891964 *Hopkins, M., Wiley, K. E., Penuel, W. R., & Farrell, C. C. (2018). Brokering research in science education policy implementation: The case of a professional association. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 14(3), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426418X15299595170910 Horn, I., Garner, B., Chen, I.-C., & Frank, K. A. (2020). Seeing Colleagues as Learning Resources: The Influence of Mathematics Teacher Meetings on Advice-Seeking Social Networks. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420914898 Hubers, M. D. (2020). Paving the way for sustainable educational change: Reconceptualizing what it means to make educational changes that last. Teaching and Teacher Education, 93, 103083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103083 *Hubers, M. D., Moolenaar, N. M., Schildkamp, K., Daly, A. J., Handelzalts, A., & Pieters, J. M. (2018). Share and succeed: The development of knowledge sharing and brokerage in data teams’ network structures. Research Papers in Education, 33(2), 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1286682 *Jabbar, H., La Londe, P. G., Debray, E., Scott, J., & Lubienski, C. (2014). How policymakers define ‘evidence’: The politics of research use in New Orleans. Policy Futures in Education, 12(8), 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.8.1013 Jesacher-Roessler, L. A. J. (2021). The travel of ideas: The dual structure of mobilized knowledge in the context of professional learning networks. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 6(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0048 *Jusinski, M. M. (2021). Knowledge broker teachers and professional development. Teacher Development, 25(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1879922 *Kisiel, J. F. (2010). Exploring a school–aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20350 Kislov, R., Wilson, P., & Boaden, R. (2017). The ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 22(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819616653981 Kolleck, N. (2016). Uncovering influence through social network analysis: The role of schools in education for sustainable development. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1119315 Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In S. M. Bacharach, S. B. Andrews, & D. Knoke (Eds.), Networks in and around organizations (Research in sociology of organizations) (Vol. 16, pp. 183–210). Emerald: Bingley. Krippendorff, K. (2011). Computing Krippendorff's alpha-reliability. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43 *Kubiak, C. (2009). Working the interface: Brokerage and learning networks. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100300 Kwon, S. W., Rondi, E., Levin, D. Z., De Massis, A., & Brass, D. J. (2020). Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1092–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320914694 Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864 Kyriakides, L., Charalambous, E., Creemers, B. P. M., Antoniou, P., Devine, D., Papastylianou, D., & Fahie, D. (2019). Using the dynamic approach to school improvement to promote quality and equity in education. An European study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31, 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9289-1 *LeChasseur, K., Donaldson, M., Fernandez, E., & Femc-Bagwell, M. (2017). Brokering, buffering, and the rationalities of principal work. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2016-0129 Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 Lomas, J. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ, 334(7585), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-158 Louis, K. S., & Dentler, R. A. (1988). Knowledge use and school improvement. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1988.11076025 Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163415 Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E. (2014). The politics of research production, promotion, and utilization in educational policy. Educational Policy, 28(2), 131–144. Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (Vol. 35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Malin, J. R. (2020). Mediated, evidence-informed practice as impact. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 16(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n8a955 Malin, J. R., & Brown, C. (2020). Joining worlds: Knowledge mobilization and evidence-informed practice. In J. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge. Malin, J. R., Brown, C., & Trubceac, A. S. (2018). Going for broke: A multiple-case study of brokerage in education. AERA Open, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418769297 *Malin, J. R., & Paralkar, V. K. (2017). Educational knowledge brokerage and mobilization: The “Marshall Memo” case. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 12(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2017v12n7a790 Malouf, D. B., & Taymans, J. M. (2016). Anatomy of an evidence base. Educational Researcher, 45(8), 454–459. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16678417 Marsden, P. V. (1982). Brokerage behavior in restricted exchange networks. In N. Lin & P. V. Marsden (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 341–410). Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/63.3.854 McGrath, C., & Krackhardt, D. (2003). Network conditions for organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303258267 Meredith, C., Van den Noortgate, W., Struyve, C., Gielen, S., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Information seeking in secondary schools: A multilevel network approach. Social Networks, 50, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.006 Meyer, M. (2010). The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication, 32(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009359797 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2011). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. New York: Routledge. Mollenhorst, G., Edling, C., & Rydgren, J. (2015). Psychological well-being and brokerage in friendship networks of young Swedes. Social Indicators Research, 123, 897–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0766-8 *Morel, R. P., & Coburn, C. (2019). Access, activation, and influence: How brokers mediate social capital among professional development providers. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 247–288. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218788528 *Neal, J. W., Neal, Z. P., Mills, K. J., Lawlor, J. A., & McAlindon, K. (2019). What types of brokerage bridge the research-practice gap? The case of public school educators. Social Networks, 59, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.05.006 *Ng-A-Fook, N., Kane, R., Butler, J., Glithero, L., & Forte, R. (2015). Brokering knowledge mobilization networks: Policy reforms, partnerships, and teacher education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(122), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2090 *Nordholm, D. (2016). Knowledge transfer in school-to-school collaborations: The position of boundary objects and brokers. Education Inquiry, 7(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.28013 Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100 *Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School Leadership & Management, 29(5), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430903162541 Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2013). Qualitative Studies Checklist. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In L. Crothers & C. Lockhart (Eds.), Culture and politics (pp. 223–234). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_12 Rechsteiner, B., Compagnoni, M., Wullschleger, A., Schäfer, L. M., Rickenbacher, A., & Maag Merki, K. (2022a). Teachers involved in school improvement: Analyzing mediating mechanisms of teachers’ boundary-crossing activities between leadership perception and teacher involvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 116(103774), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103774 Rechsteiner, B., Compagnoni, M., Maag Merki, K., & Wullschleger, A. (2022b). “Title does not dictate behavior”—Associations of Formal, Structural, and Behavioral Brokerage with School Staff Members’ Professional Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885616 Rice, R. E., & Danowski, J. A. (1993). Is it really just like a fancy answering machine? Comparing semantic networks of different types of voice mail users. Journal of Business Communication, 30(4), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369303000401 Robinson, V. M. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863299 RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development for R. R Studio, Inc. https://cran.r-project.org/ Rycroft-Smith, L. (2022). Knowledge brokering to bridge the research-practice gap in education: Where are we now? Review of Education, 10(1), e3341. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3341 Sabatino, D. A. (1982). RX for better secondary programing: A teacher-broker. Academic Therapy, 17(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345128201700305 Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004 *Sharples, J., & Sheard, M. (2015). Developing an evidence-informed support service for schools: Reflections on a UK model. Evidence & Policy, 11(4), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426415X14222958889404 Shen, J., Gao, X., & Xia, J. (2017). School as a loosely coupled organization? An empirical examination using national SASS 2003–04 data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628533 Sinnema, C., Liou, Y.-H., Daly, A., Cann, R., & Rodway, J. (2021). When seekers reap rewards and providers pay a price: The role of relationships and discussion in improving practice in a community of learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103474 Slavin, R. E. (2020). How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1611432 *Slavit, D., & Roth McDuffie, A. (2013). Self-directed teacher learning in collaborative contexts. School Science and Mathematics, 113(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12001 Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678 *Spillane, J. P., & Kim, C. M. (2012). An exploratory analysis of formal school leaders’ positioning in instructional advice and information networks in elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/667755 Stairs, A. (1995). Roles in native education: Cultural base and cultural brokerage. In M. Battiste & J. Barman (Eds.), First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (pp. 139–155). Vancouver: UBC Press. Stovel, K., & Shaw, L. (2012). Brokerage. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150054 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. *Supovitz, J. (2008). Melding internal and external support for school improvement: How the district role changes when working closely with external instructional support providers. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560802222426 *Swinnerton, J. (2007). Brokers and boundary crossers in an urban school district: Understanding central-office coaches as instructional leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460701700203 Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0688 Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003453 *Van den Boom-Muilenburg, S., Poortman, C., Daly, A., Schildkamp, K., de Vries, S., Rodway, J., & van Veen, K. (2022). Key actors leading knowledge brokerage for sustainable school improvement with PLCs: Who brokers what? Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103577 *Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Brokerage for data use in schools: Potential, occurcence and facilitators. In D. Godfrey & C. Brown (Eds.), An ecosystem for research-engaged schools: Reforming education through research (pp. 108–122). New York: Routledge. Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Knowledge brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 5(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120 Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875 Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. White, J. J. (1987). The teacher as broker of scholarly knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800404 *Wilkie, K. J. (2019). The challenge of changing teaching: Investigating the interplay of external and internal influences during professional learning with secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9376-0 *Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Struyven, K., & Engels, N. (2016). How to become a broker: The role of teacher educators in developing collaborative teacher research teams. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247721 *Wong, J. L. N. (2012). How has recent curriculum reform in China influenced school-based teacher learning? An ethnographic study of two subject departments in Shanghai, China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.724654 Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 *Zuckerman, S. J., Wilcox, K. C., Schiller, K. S., & Durand, F. T. (2018). Absorptive capacity in rural schools: Bending not breaking during disruptive innovation implementation. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 34(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18113/p8jrre3403