Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Tóm tắt
Strategies employed by dry bean breeders to improve yield include early generation testing, ideotype breeding, selection for physiological efficiency, and selection based on genotypic performance and combining ability across gene pools of Phaseolus vulgaris. Ideotype breeding has been successfully deployed to improve yield in navy, pinto and great northern seed types. The ideotype method is based on an ideal plant architecture to which breeders target their selection. Breeding for physiological efficiency is important in combining increased biomass, high growth rates and efficient partitioning. Genotypic performance and combining ability are also critical for yield improvement, since crosses between gene pools can exhibit negative combining ability and problems with lethality, whereas interracial crosses within the same gene pool exhibit the greatest potential. Breeders must work within specific constraints for growth habit, maturity, seed quality and disease resistance. A three-tiered pyramidal breeding strategy is proposed to facilitate yield improvement in dry bean. Breeding of elite, agronomically acceptable germplasm within the same market class is restricted to the apex of the pyramid. The intermediate level has fewer constraints and greater access to diverse germplasm. Interracial crosses within the same gene pool are utilized to exploit genetic differences within adapted material. Extracting genetic diversity from unadapted sources, including wild germplasm and other Phaseolus species, is conducted at the base of the pyramid. The objective of this breeding strategy is the movement of improved germplasm towards the apex, using different breeding procedures to optimize improvement at each tier of the breeding pyramid.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., J.Z. Castellanos, S. Nunez-Gonzales, R. Ochoa-Marquez, R. Rosales-Serna & S.P. Singh, 1995a. Registration of 'Flor de Mayo M38' common bean. Crop Sci 35: 941-942.
Acosta Gallegos, J.A., R. Ochoa-Marquez, F. Ibarra-Perez, A. Pajarito-Ravelero & I. Sanchez-Valdez, 1995b. Registration of 'Pinto Villa' common bean. Crop Sci 35: 1211.
Adams, M.W., 1967. Basis of yield component compensation in crop plants with special reference for field beans, Phaseolus vulgaris. Crop Sci 7: 505-510.
Adams, M.W., 1973. Plant architecture and physiological efficiency. In: Potential of Field Beans and other Food Legumes in Latin America, pp. 226-278. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
Adams, M.W., 1982. Plant architecture and yield breeding in Phaseolus vulgarisL. Iowa State J Res 56: 225-254.
Beaver, J.S. & J.D. Kelly, 1994. Comparison of two selection methods for the improvement of dry bean populations derived from crosses between gene pools. Crop Sci 34: 34-37.
Beaver, J.S., C. Paniagua, D. Coyne & G. Freytag, 1985. Yield stability of dry bean genotypes in the Dominican Republic. Crop Sci 25: 923-926.
Beaver, J.S., E. Arnaud-Santana & D.P. Coyne, 1996. Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate red mottled beans. J Agric Univ P R 80: 187-189.
Beebe, S.E., I. Ochoa, P. Skroch, J. Nienhuis & J. Tivang, 1995. Genetic diversity among common bean breeding lines developed for Central America. Crop Sci 35: 1178-1183.
Bett, K.E. & T.E. Michaels, 1994. Accumulation of blight resistance using a conical cross. Ann Rep Bean Improv Crop 37: 75-76.
Bliss, F.A., 1993. Breeding common bean for improved nitrogen fixation. Plant and Soil 152: 71-79.
Brothers, M.E. & J.D. Kelly, 1993. Interrelationship of plant architecture and yield components in the pinto bean ideotype. Crop Sci 33: 1234-1238.
Castellanos, J.Z., H. Guzman-Maldonado, A. Jimenez, C. Mejia, J. Munoz-Ramos, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, G. Hoyos, E. Lopez-Salinas, D. Gonzales-Eguiarte, R. Salinas-Perez, J. Gonzales-Acuna, J.A. Munoz-Villalobos, P. Fernandez-Hernandez & B. Caceres, 1997. Preferential habits of consumers of common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) in Mexico (English summary). Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion 47: 163-167.
Cooper, R.L., 1985. Breeding semidwarf soybeans. Plant Breed Rev 3: 289-311.
Coyne, D.P., J.R. Steadman, D.T. Lindgren & D.S. Nuland, 1991. "starlight' - Great northern dry bean. HortScience 26: 441-442.
Coyne, D.P., D.S. Nuland, D.T. Lindgren & J.R. Steadman, 1994. 'Chase' pinto dry bean. HortScience 29: 44-45.
Cramer, M.M. & L.W. Kannenberg, 1992. Five years of HOPE: the hierarchical open-ended corn breeding system. Crop Sci 32: 1163-1171.
Donald, C.M., 1968. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385-403.
Elia, F.M., G.L. Hosfield, J.D. Kelly & M.A. Uebersax, 1997. Genetic analysis and interrelationships between traits for cooking time, water absorption, and protein and tannin content of Andean dry beans. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 122: 512-518.
Fehr, W.., 1987. In: J.R. Wilcox (Ed.), Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses, pp. 250-255. ASA 16.
Fouilloux, G. & H. Bannerot, 1988. Selection methods in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). In: P. Gepts (Ed.), Genetic Resources of PhaseolusBeans, pp. 503-542. Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Freytag, G.F. & D.G. Debouck, 1996. Phaseolus costaricensis. A new wild bean species (Phaseolinae leguminosae) from Costa Rica and Panama, Central America. Novon 6: 157-163.
Gepts, P. & F.A. Bliss, 1985. F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean. J Hered 76: 447-450.
Grafton, K.F., J.R. Venette & K.C. Chang, 1997a. Registration of 'Hatton' pinto bean. Crop Sci 37: 288.
Grafton, K.F., J.R. Venette & K.C. Chang, 1997b. Registration of 'Maverick' pinto bean. Crop Sci 37: 1672.
Ininda, J., W.R. Fehr, S.R. Cianzio & S.R. Schnebly, 1996. Genetic gain in soybean populations with different percentages of plant introduction parentage. Crop Sci 36: 1470-1472.
Kami, J., V. Becerra Velasquez, D.G. Debouck & P. Gepts, 1995. Identification of presumed ancestral DNA sequences of phaseolin in Phaseolus vulgaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 1101-1104.
Kannenberg, L.W., 1981. Activation and deployment of genetic resources in a maize breeding program. In: G.G.E. Scudder & J.L. Reveal (Eds.), Evolution Today, pp. 393-399. Proc 2nd Intl Congr of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kannenberg, L.W. & D.E. Falk, 1995. Models for activation of plant genetic resources for crop breeding programs. Can J Plant Sci 75: 45-53.
Kelly, J.D. & M.W. Adams, 1987. Phenotypic recurrent selection in ideotype breeding of pinto beans. Euphytica 36: 69-80.
Kelly, J.D., M.W. Adams & G.V. Varner, 1987. Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate dry bean cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 74: 516-521.
Kelly, J.D., M.W. Adams, A.W. Saettler, G.L. Hosfield, G.V. Varner, M.A. Uebersax & J. Taylor, 1990. Registration of "sierra' pinto bean. Crop Sci 30: 745-746.
Kelly, J.D., G.L. Hosfield, G.V. Varner, M.A. Uebersax, P.N. Miklas & J. Taylor, 1992a. Registration of 'Alpine' great northern bean. Crop Sci 32: 1509-1510.
Kelly, J.D., G.L. Hosfield, G.V. Varner, M.A. Uebersax, N. Wassimi & J. Taylor, 1992b. Registration of 'Aztec' pinto bean. Crop Sci 32: 1509.
Kisha, T.J., C.H. Sneller & B.W. Diers, 1997. Relationship between genetic distance among parents and genetic variance in populations of soybean. Crop Sci 37: 1317-1325.
Koinange, E.M.K., S.P. Singh & P. Gepts, 1996. Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci 36: 1037-1045.
Kornegay, J., J.W. White & O. Ortiz de la Cruz, 1992. Growth habit and gene pool effects on inheritance of yield in common bean. Euphytica 62: 171-180.
McClean, P.E., J. Myers & J.J. Hammond, 1993. Coefficient of parentage and cluster analysis of North American dry bean cultivars. Crop Sci 33: 190-197.
Nienhuis, J.& S.P. Singh, 1985. Effects of location and plant density on yield and architectural traits of common bean. Crop Sci 25: 579-584.
Nienhuis, J. & S.P. Singh, 1986. Combining ability analysis and relationships among yield, yield components and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Sci 26: 21-27.
Nienhuis, J. & S.P. Singh, 1988. Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) of Middle American origin. II. Genetics, variance, heritability and expected response from selection. Plant Breed 101: 155-163.
Panter, D.M. & F.L. Allen, 1995. Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean: I. Choosing parents. Crop Sci 35: 397-405.
Parades, O.M. & P. Gepts, 1995. Extensive introgression of Middle American germplasm into Chilean common bean cultivars. Gen Res and Crop Evol 42: 29-41.
Park, S.J. & J.C. Tu, 1987. Comparison of near-isogenic lines for anthracnose Are aregenes in common bean, Phaseolus vulgarisL. Euphytica 36: 251-256.
Patino, H. & S.P. Singh, 1989. Visual selection for seed yield in the F2 and F3 generations of nine common bean crosses. Ann Rep Bean Improv Coop 32: 79-80.
Patterson, A.H., 1998. Molecular dissection of complex traits. pp. 187-195. CRC Press NY.
Rasmusson, D.C., 1987. An evaluation of ideotype breeding. Crop Sci 27: 1140-1146.
Singh, S.P., 1991. Breeding for seed yield. In: A. Van Schoonhoven & O. Voysest (Eds.), Common beans. Research for Crop Improvement. CAB Int CIAT, Colombia.
Singh, S.P., 1992. Common bean improvement in the tropics. Plant Breed Rev 10: 199-269.
Singh, S.P., 1994. Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci 34: 352-355.
Singh, S.P., 1995a. Selection for water-stress tolerance in interracial populations of common bean. Crop Sci 35: 118-124.
Singh, S.P., 1995b. Selection for seed yield in Middle American versus Andean Middle American interracial common bean populations. Plant Breed 114: 269-271.
Singh, S.P., 1996. Effect of random intermating in early generations on seed yield in interracial populations of common bean. Can J Plant Sci 76: 683-688.
Singh, S.P., 1997. Single seed descent versus gamete selection for breeding beans for resistance to insects. Agron Abstracts p. 71.
Singh, S.P. & J.A. Gutierrez, 1990. Effect of plant density on selection for seed yield in two population types of Phaseolus vulgarisL. Euphytica 51: 173-178.
Singh, S.P. & C.A. Urrea, 1995. Inter-and intraracial hybridization and selection for seed yield in early generations of common bean. Euphytica 81: 131-137.
Singh, S.P., C. Cijiao, J.A, Gutierrez, J. Garcia, M.A. Pastor-Corrales & F.J. Morales, 1989a. Selection for seed yield in inter-gene pool crosses of common bean. Crop Sci 29: 1126-1131.
Singh, S.P., C.A. Urrea, J.A. Gutierrez & J. Garcia, 1989b. Selection for yield at two fertilizer levels in small-seeded common bean. Can J Plant Sci 69: 1011-1017.
Singh, S.P., R. Lepiz, J.A. Gutierrez, C. Urrea, A. Molina & H. Teran, 1990. Yield testing of early generation populations of common bean. Crop Sci 30: 874-878.
Singh, S.P., H. Teran, A. Molina & J.A. Gutierrez, 1992a. Combining ability for seed yield and its components in common bean of Andean origin. Crop Sci 32: 81-84.
Singh, S.P., C.A. Urrea, A. Molina & J.A. Gutierrez, 1992b. Performance of small-seeded common bean from the second selection cycle and multiple-cross intra-and interracial populations. Can J Plant Sci 72: 735-741.
Singh, S.P., A. Molina, C.A. Urrea & J.A. Gutierrez, 1993. Use of interracial hybridization in breeding the race Durango common bean. Can J Plant Sci 73: 785-793.
Singh, S.P., A. Molina & P. Gepts, 1995. Potential of wild common bean for seed yield improvement of cultivars in the tropics. Can J Plant Sci 75: 807-813.
Singh, S.P., C. Cardona, F.J. Morales, M.A. Pastor-Corrales & O. Voysest, 1996. Gamete selection for upright Carioca beans with resistance to leaf hopper and four diseases. Ann Rep Bean Improv Coop 39: 86-87.
Stewart-Williams, K. & J. Myers, 1995. 46th Annual Report of the National Cooperative Dry Bean Nurseries. Univ of Idaho, SP 17.
Tanksley, S.D. & S.R. McCouch, 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066.
Tanksley, S.D., S. Grandillo, T.M. Fulton, D. Zamir, Y. Eshed, V. Petiard, J. Lopez & T. Beck-Bunn, 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 213-224.
Tohme, J., D.O. Gonzalez, S. Beebe & M.C. Duque, 1996. AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection. Crop Sci 36: 1375-1384.
Urrea, C.A. & S.P. Singh, 1995. Comparison of recurrent and congruity backcrossing for interracial hybridization in common bean. Euphytica 81: 21-26.
Voysest, O., M.C. Valencia & M.C. Amezquita, 1994. Genetic diversity among Latin American, Andean and Mesoamerican common bean cultivars. Crop Sci 34: 1100-1110.
Wallace, D.H., J.P. Baudoin, J.S. Beaver, D.P. Coyne, D.E. Halseth, P.N. Masaya, H.M. Munger, J.R. Myers, M. Silbernagel, K.S. Yourstone & R.W. Zobel, 1993. Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor Appl Genet 86: 27-40.
Wallace, D.H., P.N. Masaya, R. Rodriquez & R.W. Zobel, 1995. Genotype, temperature, and genotype temperature interaction effects on yield of bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.). In: M. Pessarakli (Ed.), Handbook of Plant & Crop Physiology, pp. 893-915. Marcel Dekker, NY.
Welsh, W., W. Bushuk, W. Roca & S.P. Singh, 1995. Characterization of agronomic traits and markers of recombinant inbred lines from intra-and interracial populations of Phaseolus vulgarisL. Theor Appl Genet 91: 169-177.
White, J. & A. Gonzales, 1990. Characterization of the negative association between seed yield and seed size among genotypes of common bean. Field Crops Res 23: 159-175.
White, J.W.& S.P. Singh, 1991. Sources and inheritance of earliness in tropically adapted indeterminate common bean. Euphytica 55: 15-19.
White, J.W., J. Kornegay, J. Castillo, C.H. Cajiao & G. Tejeda, 1992. Effect of growth habit on yield of large-seeded bush cultivars of common bean. Field Crops Res 29: 151-161.
Xiao, J., J. Li, S. Grandillo, S.N. Ahn, L. Yuan, S.D. Tanksley & S.R. McCouch, 1997. Identification of heterosis-enhancing QTL alleles from a wild rice relative, Oryza rufipogon. Plant & Animal Genome V, P147, abstract.