Blocking AGE-RAGE Signaling Improved Functional Disorders of Macrophages in Diabetic Wound

Journal of Diabetes Research - Tập 2017 - Trang 1-10 - 2017
Qi Wang1, Guanya Zhu1, Xianyi Cao1, Jiaoyun Dong1, Fei Song1, Yiwen Niu1
1Shanghai Burn Institute, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Tóm tắt

Advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) accumulate in diabetic wounds. Interactions between AGEs and their receptor (RAGE) leads to dermatologic problems in diabetes. Macrophage, which plays important roles in wound healing, highly expresses RAGE. Therefore, we investigated whether RAGE-expressing macrophages might be responsible for impaired wound healing on diabetes. We used anti-RAGE antibody applied topically on diabetic wounds. After confirming that wound healing was improved in anti-RAGE antibody group compared with normal mice, our results showed that macrophages appeared insufficient in the early stage and fading away slowly in the later proliferative phase compared with the control group, which was ameliorated in anti-RAGE antibody-applied wounds. Blocking AGE-RAGE signaling also increased neutrophils phagocytized by macrophages and promoted the phenotypic switch of macrophages from proinflammatory to prohealing activities. In vitro, phagocytosis of THP-1 (M0) and lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced (M1) macrophages was impaired by treatment with AGEs, while IL-4- and IL-13-induced (M2) macrophages was not. Finally, AGEs increased the proinflammatory response of M1 macrophages, while inhibiting the polarization and anti-inflammatory functions of M2 macrophages. In conclusion, inhibition of AGE-RAGE signaling improved functional disorders of macrophages in the early inflammatory phase, which promoted the healing of wounds in diabetic mice.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/wrr.12444

10.1016/j.diabres.2004.09.004

10.1016/s0008-6363(97)00233-2

10.1007/s001250051591

10.1097/01.sap.0000122857.49274.8c

10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2

10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00296-4

10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00772.x

10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.08.003

10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105812

2010, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 3, 643

10.1016/j.imbio.2011.01.001

10.12968/jowc.1998.7.6.281

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000331

10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130304.x

10.1016/s0531-5565(97)00094-6

10.1016/j.archger.2009.11.015

10.1016/j.transci.2003.11.007

10.1038/sj.cdd.4402184

10.1038/ni.2109

10.1016/j.smim.2014.04.006

10.1189/jlb.1012512

10.1189/jlb.0509311

10.3389/fphar.2014.00001

10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2265

10.1189/jlb.0409236

10.1089/wound.2012.0407

10.1172/JCI44490