Biased Visuospatial Attention in Cervical Dystonia

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society - Tập 24 Số 1 - Trang 22-32 - 2018
Gaetana Chillemi1,2,3,4, Caterina Formica1,2,3,4, Adriana Salatino1,2,3,4, Alessandro Calamuneri1,2,3,4, Paolo Girlanda1,2,3,4, Francesca Morgante1,2,3,4, Demetrio Milardi1,2,3,4, Carmen Terranova1,2,3,4, Alberto Cacciola1,2,3,4, Angelo Quartarone1,2,3,4, Raffaella Ricci1,2,3,4
12Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
23IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", S.S. 113, Messina, Italy
34Department of Biomedicai and Dentai Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
4Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Messina, Italy

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectives: There is increasing evidence of non-motor, sensory symptoms, mainly involving the spatial domain, in cervical dystonia (CD). These manifestations are likely driven by dysfunctional overactivity of the parietal cortex during the execution of a sensory task. Few studies also suggest the possibility that visuospatial attention might be specifically affected in patients with CD. Therefore, we asked whether non-motor manifestations in CD might also comprise impairment of higher level visuospatial processing. Methods: To this end, we investigated visuospatial attention in 23 CD patients and 12 matched healthy controls (for age, gender, education, and ocular dominance). The patients were identified according to the dystonia pattern type (laterocollis vs. torticollis). Overall, participants were right-handers, and the majority of them was right-eye dominant. Visuospatial attention was assessed using a line bisection task. Participants were asked to bisect horizontal lines, using their right or left hand. Results: Participants bisected more to the left of true center when using their left hand to perform the task than when using their right hand. However, overall, torticollis patients produced a significantly greater leftward deviation than controls. Conclusions: These data are consistent with preliminary findings suggesting the presence of biased spatial attention in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia. The presence of an attentional bias in patients with torticollis seem to indicate that alterations of attentional circuits might be implicated in the pathophysiology of this type of CD. (JINS, 2018, 24, 23–32)

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Wilkins, 1996, Neurosurgery, 4159

Yang, 2010, A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance, Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics, 51, 588

10.1371/journal.pone.0138379

10.1016/j.nbd.2010.08.025

10.1007/s00221-014-4056-0

10.1093/brain/awf210

10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61592-4

10.1212/WNL.37.11.1762

Nutt, 1988, Epidemiology of dystonia in Rochester, Minnesota, Advances in Neurology Journal, 50, 361

10.1002/ana.10610

10.1002/mds.22983

10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.062

10.1007/s12311-009-0133-5

10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7

10.3389/fnhum.2012.00326

Ricci R. , Mazzeo G. , Celentano B. , Nobili M. , & Salatino A. (2015). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex for the treatment of focal dystonia. Proceedings of XXIII National Congress of the Italian Society of Psychophysiology. Neuropsychological Trends - ISSN:1970-321X.

10.3389/fnagi.2014.00113

10.1097/00001756-199708180-00009

10.1002/mds.26725

10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00663.x

10.1007/BF00878528

10.1080/00223980.1962.9713115

10.1017/neu.2015.23

10.1007/s12311-010-0237-y

10.1111/1469-8986.3710013

10.1212/01.WNL.0000026474.12594.0D

10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92070-2

10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00163

10.1017/S1355617715000338

10.1038/nn.2905

10.1002/mds.25475

10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

10.1002/mds.10308

10.1016/j.otot.2004.03.004

10.1212/WNL.30.5.509

10.2466/pms.1994.78.3c.1363

10.1016/0304-3959(95)00156-5

10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70544-6

10.1002/mds.870060206

10.1212/WNL.14.4.287

10.1017/S1355617703910083

10.3389/fnhum.2014.00458

10.1002/mds.23709

10.1155/2013/908741

10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01238

10.1007/s00221-007-0857-8

10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.006

10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00704

10.1093/brain/awm143

10.3389/fnhum.2014.00956

10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.038

10.1037/a0031618

10.14802/jmd.16014

10.1620/tjem.161.329

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.050

10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00129-8

10.1002/mds.25532

10.1017/S135561771600045X

10.1007/s12311-015-0731-3

10.1212/WNL.44.5.846

10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00054-9

10.3389/fneur.2017.00066

10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7

10.1002/mds.22490

10.1212/WNL.54.6.1324

10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00862.x