Beyond the smart city: a typology of platform urbanism

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 4 - Trang 1-21 - 2022
Federico Caprotti1, I.-Chun Catherine Chang2, Simon Joss3
1Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Mail Room, The Old Library, Exeter, UK
2Department of Geography, Macalester College, Saint Paul, USA
3Urban Studies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Tóm tắt

Platform urbanism has emerged in recent years as an area of research into the ways in which digital platforms are increasingly central to the governance, economy, experience, and understanding of the city. In the paper, we argue that platform urbanism is an evolution of the smart city, constituted by novel, digitally-enabled socio-technical assemblages that enable new forms of social, economic and political intermediation. We offer a typological framework for a better conceptualization of platform urbanism and its complex socio-economic relationships. We further outline several directions for future research on platform urbanism, specifically: a.) the need to critically investigate new power geometries of corporate, legal and regulatory alignments; b.) how platform urbanism may be expressed in, and affect, cities in the Global South; c.) how it may need to be critically engaged with in regard to its development in response to emergent events such as the Covid-19 pandemic; and d.) how it may shape visions of the current and future city.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM. Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J Urban Technol. 2015;22(1):3–21. Aloisi A. Commoditized workers: case study research on labor law issues arising from a set of on-demand/gig economy platforms. Comp Labor Law Policy J. 2016;37(3):653–84. Aloisi A. The invention of the future. Does ‘platformization’ redefine the notion of the firm? Bocconi University Legal Studies Research Paper No 3124389. 2018. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3124389## Barns S. Smart cities and urban data platforms: designing interfaces for smart governance. City Cult Soc. 2018;12:5–12. Barns S. Platform Urbanism: Negotiating Platform Ecosystems in Connected Cities. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. Barns S. Negotiating the platform pivot: from participatory digital systems to infrastructures of everyday life. Geog Comp 2019;13(9) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12464 Basmi W, Boulmakoul A, Karim L, Lbath A. Distributed and scalable platform architecture for smart cities complex events data collection: Covid19 pandemic use case. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2021;12:75–83. Bettman J, Harris M. Mobile money: the impact of smartphones on the international remittance market. J Payments Strat Syst. 2014;8(3):264–73. Bissell D. Affective platform urbanism: changing habits of digital on-demand consumption. Geoforum. 2020;115:102–10. Boeing G, Besbris M, Wachsmuth D. 2021 Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies. Urban Transformations 3(6) https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2 Boy JD, Uitermark J. Reassembling the city through Instagram. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2017;42:612–24. Bratton BH. The stack: On software and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2016. Bratton BH. 2015. Cloud megastructures and platform utopias. In Geiger J ed Entr’acte: Performing Publics, Pervasive Media, and Architecture. London, Palgrave Macmillan: 35–51. Brenner N, Schmid C. The ‘Urban Age’ in question. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2013;38(3):731–55. Butler S. 2017. How Deliveroo’s ‘dark kitchens’ are catering from car parks. The Guardian, 28 Oct 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/oct/28/deliveroo-dark-kitchens-pop-up-feeding-the-city-london Calzada I. Platform and Data co-operatives amidst european pandemic citizenship. Sustainability. 2020;12(20):8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208309. Cameron D. 2019. Amazon rents more jets to expand next-day delivery. Wall Street Journal 18 Jun 2019. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-rents-more-jets-to-expand-next-day-delivery-11560889819 Caprotti F, Liu D. Emerging platform urbanism in China: reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities. Techn Forecast Soc Ch 2019;151(February 2020):119690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016 Caprotti F, Cowley R. Varieties of smart urbanism in the UK: discursive logics, the state, and local urban context. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2019;44(3):587–601. Caprotti F, Liu D. Platform urbanism and the Chinese smart city: the co-production and territorialisation of Hangzhou City Brain. GeoJournal. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10320-2. Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P. Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol. 2011;18(2):65–82. Cardullo P, Kitchin R. 2018. Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: the neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Envir. Pl. C: Pol. Sp. 2018;37(5):813–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508 Chironga M, De Grandis H, Zouaoui Y. Mobile financial services in Africa: winning the battle for the customer. McKinsey & Company website. 2017. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/mobile-financial-services-in-africa-winning-the-battle-for-the-customer Accessed 22 November 2018. Cowley R, Caprotti F. Smart city as anti-planning in the UK. Environ. Plann. D.: Soc. Sp. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818787506. Cowley R, Joss S, Dayot Y. The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities. Urban Res Pract. 2018;11(1):53–77. Crivello S. Urban policy mobilities: the case of Turin as a smart city. Eur Plan Stud. 2015;23(5):909–21. Dalton CM. Rhizomatic data assemblages: mapping new possibilities for urban housing data. Urban Geogr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1645553. Debord,. The Society of the Spectacle. London: Rebel Press; 1994. de Jong M, Joss S, Schraven D, Zhan C, Weijnen M. Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J. Clean. Prod. 2015;109(16 December 2015):25–38. Dittus M, Wright J and Graham M (2018) Platform criminalism: the ‘last-mile’ geography of the darknet market supply chain. In WWW 2018: The 2018 Web Conference, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, France https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876. 3186094 Drahokoupil J, Piasna A. Work in the platform economy: beyond lower transaction costs. Intereconomics. 2017;52(6):335–40. Fields D, Bissell D, Macrorie R. Platform methods: studying platform urbanism outside the black box. Urban Geogr. 2020;41(3):462–8. Gabrys J. Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Envir Plann D: Soc Sp. 2014;32(1):30–48. Gabrys J. The becoming environmental of computation: from citizen sensing to planetary computerization. Tecnoscienza: Italian J Sci Technol Stud. 2017;8(1):5–21. Gillespie T. The politics of ‘platforms.’ New Media Soc. 2010;12(3):347–64. Graham M, Hjorth I, Lehdonvirta V. Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: Eur Rev Labour Res. 2017;23(2):135–62. Hollands RG. Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City. 2008;12(3):303–20. Hollands RG. Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Camb J Reg Econ Soc. 2015;8(1):61–77. S Jordan. Writing the smart city: ‘relational space’ and the concept of ‘belonging’. Writing in Practice: The Journal of Creative Writing Research. 2015;1: np. Available at: https://www.nawe.co.uk/DB/current-wip-edition/articles/writing-the-smart-city-relational-space-and-the-concept-of-belonging.html Joss S. Sustainable Cities: Governing For Urban Innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. Joss S, Cook M, Dayot Y. Smart cities: towards a new citizenship regime? a discourse analysis of the British Smart City Standard. J Urban Technol. 2017;24(4):29–49. Kanda W, Kuisma M, Kivimaa P, Hjelm O. Conceptualising the systemic activities of intermediaries in sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 2020;36:449–65. Karvonen A, Cugurullo F, Caprotti F. Conclusions: the long and unsettled future of smart cities In Karvonen A, Cugurullo F and Caprotti F (eds) Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation. 2018. p. 291–8. Kitchin R. The real-time smart city: Big Data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal. 2014;79(1):1–14. Kitchin R, Lauriault T. Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. In: Thatcher J, Shears A, Eckert J, editors. Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press; 2018. p. 3–30. Komljenovic J. Linkedin, platforming labour, and the new employability mandate for universities. Glob Soc Educ. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2018.1500275. Lai Y, Yeung W, Celi LA. Urban intelligence for pandemic response: viewpoint. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2): e18873. https://doi.org/10.2196/18873. Langley P, Leyshon A. Platform capitalism: the intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance Soc. 2017a;3(1):11–31. Langley P, Leyshon A. Capitalizing on the crowd: the monetary and financial ecologies of crowdfunding. Environ Plan A. 2017b;49(5):1019–39. Leszczynski A. Digital methods II: digital-visual methods. Prog Hum Geogr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518787997. Leszczynski A. Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environ Plann d: Soc Space. 2020;38(2):189–208. Liceras P. Singapore experiments with its digital twin to improve city life. Tomorrow.Mag. 2019 (Accessed 10 Jul 2020).Available at: https://www.smartcitylab.com/blog/ Lin Y. E-urbanism: e-commerce, migration, and the transformation of Taobao villages in urban China. Cities. 2019;91:202–12. Luque-Ayala A, Marvin S. Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies. 2015;52(12):2105–16. McNeill D. Global firms and smart technologies: IBM and the reduction of cities. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2015;40(4):562–74. McNeill D. Start-ups and the entrepreneurial city. City. 2017;21(2):232–9. Meier LM, Manzerolle VR. Rising tides? Data capture, platform accumulation, and new monopolies in the digital music economy. New Media Soc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818800998. Merrifield A. Planetary urbanisation: une affaire de perception. Urban Geogr. 2018;39(10):1603–7. Mohapatra S, Ratha D. Migrant remittances in Africa: an overview. In: Mohapatra S, Ratha D, editors. Remittance Markets in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011. p. 3–70. Murillo D, Buckland H, Val E. When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: unravelling the controversies. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2017;125:66–76. Nash V, Bright J, Margetts H, Lehdonvirta V. Public policy in the platform society. Policy Internet. 2017;9(4):368–73. Nieborg DB, Helmond A. The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a platform instance. Media Cult Soc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818384. Nooren P, van Gorp N, van Eijk N, Fathaigh Ó, R,. Should we regulate digital platforms? A new framework for evaluating policy options. Policy Internet. 2018;10(3):264–301. Pasquale F. Two narratives of platform capitalism. Yale Law Policy Rev. 2016;35(1):309–20. Pollio A. Uber, airports, and labour at the infrastructural interfaces of platform urbanism. Geoforum. 2021;118:47–55. Qi J, Zheng X, Guo H. The formation of Taobao villages in China. China Econ Rev. 2019;53:106–27. Riemens Carolin R, Peter N, Martijn P, van den Hurk. An assessment framework for safeguarding public values on mobility platforms. Urban Transf. 2021;3(7):1–27. Rose G, Willis A. Seeing the smart city on Twitter: Colour and the affective territories of becoming smart. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818771080. Rose G, Raghuram P, Watson S, Wigley E. Platform urbanism, smartphone applications and valuing data in a smart city. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12400. Rose G. Smart urban: imaginary, interiority, intelligence. 2018. In: Lindner C and Meissner M eds The Routledge Companion to Urban Imaginaries London, Routledge: 105–112. Sadowski J. Cyberspace and cityscapes: on the emergence of platform urbanism. Urban Geogr. 2020;41(3):448–52. Shelton T, Zook M, Wiig A. The ‘actually existing smart city.’ Camb J Reg Econ Soc. 2015;8(1):13–25. Shwarz JA. Platform logic: an interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy. Policy Internet. 2017;9(4):374–94. Snider L. Enabling exploitation: law in the gig economy. Crit Criminol. 2018;26:563–77. Söderstrom O. The three modes of existence of the pandemic smart city. Urban Geogr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1807167. Söderstrom O and Mermet, A-C. When airbnb sits in the control room: platform urbanism as actually existing smart urbanism in Reykjavík. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 2020(14 May 2020) https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.00015 Spangler I. Hidden value in the platform’s platform: Airbnb, displacement, and the un-homing spatialities of emotional labour. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2020;45(3):575–88. Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity; 2017. Tironi M and Valderrama M. Acknowledging the idiot in the smart city: experimentation and citizenship in the making of low-carbon district in Santiago de Chile. 2018. In Karvonen A, Cugurullo F and Caprotti F (eds) Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation 165–181. Townsend AM. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: W W Norton & Company; 2013. van der Graaf S. In Waze we trust: algorithmic governance of the public sphere. Media Comm. 2018;6(4):153–62. van der Graaf S, Ballon P. Navigating platform urbanism. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.027. Wagner J R. Circulating value: convergences of datafication, financialization, and urbanization. Urban Transformations. 2021;3(4) https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00022-4 Webster NA, Zhang Q. Centering social-technical relations in studying platform urbanism: intersectionality for just futures in European cities. Urban Transformations. 2021;3(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00027-z Wiig A. IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City. 2015;19(2–3):258–73. Williamson B. learning in the ‘platform society’: disassembling an educational data assemblage. Res Educ. 2017;98(1):59–82. Winter M, Tomko S. Beyond digital twins – a commentary. Envir Plann B: Urb Anal City Sci. 2019;46(2):395–9.