Between exchange and development

Emerald - Tập 17 Số 1 - Trang 69-85 - 2010
Klaus‐PeterSchulz1, SilkeGeithner2
1Department of Organization Studies and Work Research, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
2Department of Organization Studies, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss how communication and cooperation in inter‐organizational networks may bring about organizational learning. A case study of 13 inter‐organizational school networks in Germany is carried out for this purpose.Design/methodology/approachResults of a quantitative survey assessing the performance of the 13 networks are presented. A subsequent qualitative survey of two highly innovative networks takes into account the learning effects in school practice. The analysis is predicated on an activity theoretic view on learning and development.FindingsTwo levels of consideration are distinguished: the learning platform where representatives of the schools regularly meet and the operational work at the schools. The perception of how the representatives in the network learned how the colleagues at the schools who are not directly involved learned and how the school as a whole learned is appreciated differently. Outcomes vary from “exchange of new ideas” to “implementation of school development.”Research limitations/implicationsThe paper is based on empirical research carried out at one point in time. A longitudinal study of inter‐organizational network performance could shed more light on the dynamic validity of the model.Practical implicationsUnderstanding networks allow to appreciate their outcomes. The outcomes of this paper provide guides on how to design more effective learning networks.Originality/valueThe conceptual model distinguishes between two network levels, its interrelated learning effects and the different stages of learning and development. Learning networks can be assessed due to the learning categories, and success factors can be identified.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballantine Books, New York, NY.

Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M. and Jensen, U.J. (Eds) (1999), Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural‐Historical Approaches, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus.

Ciborra, C. (1996), “The platform organization: recombining strategies, structures, and surprises”, Organization Science, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 103‐18.

Czarniawska, B. (2004), “On time, space, and action nets”, Organization, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 773‐91.

Czerwanski, A. (2003a), “Ergebnisse einer Evaluation: Der Nutzen der Lernnetzwerke Teilnehmersicht” (“Findings of the evaluation: the benefit of the network participants”), in Czerwanski, A. (Ed.), Schulentwicklung durch Netzwerkarbeit, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, pp. 203‐21.

Czerwanski, A. (Ed.) (2003b), Schulentwicklung durch Netzwerkarbeit (School Development Through Networking), Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh.

Engeström, Y. (1987), Learning by Expanding, Orienta‐Konsultit, Helsinki.

Engeström, Y. (2000a), “A story of four umpires”, Organization, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 301‐10.

Engeström, Y. (2000b), “From individual action to collective activity and back: developmental work research as an interventionist methodology”, in Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (Eds), Workplace Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 150‐68.

Engeström, Y. (2001), “Expansive learning at work: towards an activity theoretical reconceptualization”, Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 133‐56.

Engeström, Y. (2005), Developmental Work Research: Expanding Activity Theory in Practice, Lehmanns Media, Berlin.

Engeström, Y. (2008), From Teams to Knots: Activity‐theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Engeström, Y. and Blackler, F. (2005), “On the life of the object”, Organization Science, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 307‐30.

Engeström, Y. and Kerosuo, H. (2007), “From workplace learning to inter‐organizational learning and back: the contribution of activity theory”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 336‐41.

Geithner, S. (2003), “Wie kann Netzwerkarbeit innerschulisch greifen? Acht Thesen aus der Praxis für die Praxis (How can networking lead to school development? Eight assumptions from practice for practice)”, in Czerwanski, A. (Ed.), Schulentwicklung durch Netzwerkarbeit, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, pp. 223‐33.

Kerosuo, H. (2006), Boundaries in Action: An Activity‐theoretical Study of Development, Learning and Change in Health Care for Patients with Multiple and Chronic Illnesses, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki.

Mayring, P. (2000), “Qualitative content analysis forum”, Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 1 No. 2, available at: http://qualitative‐research.net/fqs/fqs‐e/2‐00inhalte.htm (accessed March 2009).

Miettinen, R. (2000), “The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action”, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 54‐72.

Picot, A., Reichwald, R. and Wigand, R.T. (2003), Die Grenzenlose Unternehmung, Information, Organisation und Management (The Boundless Enterprise – Information, Organization and Management), Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Schulz, K.‐P. (2005), “Learning in complex organizations as practicing and reflecting. A model development and application from a theory of practice perspective”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 17 No. 8, pp. 493‐507.

Schulz, K.‐P. (2008), “Shared knowledge and understandings in organizations – its development and impact in organizational learning processes”, Management Learning, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 457‐73.

Schulz, K.‐P., Pérez, F.G. and Geithner, S. (2006), “Network communication and organizational development”, paper presented at 56th Annual International Communication Association Conference, Dresden.

Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L. and DeFillippi, R. (2004), “Project‐based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: editorial”, Organization Studies, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 1475‐89.

Toiviainen, H. (2003), Learning Across Levels: Challenges of Collaboration in a Small‐Firm Network, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki.

Toiviainen, H. (2007), “Inter‐organizational learning across levels: an object‐oriented approach”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 343‐58.

Victor, B. and Boynton, A. (1998), Invented Here: Maximizing Your Organization's Internal Growth and Profitability, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

West, M. (2002), “Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 355‐424.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 17 Số 1

69-85

Thông tin tác giả