Benefits and resource implications of family meetings for hospitalized palliative care patients: research protocol

BMC Palliative Care - Tập 14 - Trang 1-9 - 2015
Peter L. Hudson1,2, Afaf Girgis3, Geoffrey K. Mitchell4, Jenny Philip1, Deborah Parker5, David Currow6, Danny Liew7, Kristina Thomas1, Brian Le8, Juli Moran9, Caroline Brand7,10
1Centre for Palliative Care St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
2Queens University, Belfast, UK
3Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
4School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
5Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
6Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia
7Melbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia
8Palliative & Supportive Care Melbourne Health & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
9Palliative Care Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
10Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Tóm tắt

Palliative care focuses on supporting patients diagnosed with advanced, incurable disease; it is ‘family centered’, with the patient and their family (the unit of care) being core to all its endeavours. However, approximately 30–50 % of carers experience psychological distress which is typically under recognised and consequently not addressed. Family meetings (FM) are recommended as a means whereby health professionals, together with family carers and patients discuss psychosocial issues and plan care; however there is minimal empirical research to determine the net effect of these meetings and the resources required to implement them systematically. The aims of this study were to evaluate: (1) if family carers of hospitalised patients with advanced disease (referred to a specialist palliative care in-patient setting or palliative care consultancy service) who receive a FM report significantly lower psychological distress (primary outcome), fewer unmet needs, increased quality of life and feel more prepared for the caregiving role; (2) if patients who receive the FM experience appropriate quality of end-of-life care, as demonstrated by fewer hospital admissions, fewer emergency department presentations, fewer intensive care unit hours, less chemotherapy treatment (in last 30 days of life), and higher likelihood of death in the place of their choice and access to supportive care services; (3) the optimal time point to deliver FM and; (4) to determine the cost-benefit and resource implications of implementing FM meetings into routine practice. Cluster type trial design with two way randomization for aims 1-3 and health economic modeling and qualitative interviews with health for professionals for aim 4. The research will determine whether FMs have positive practical and psychological impacts on the family, impacts on health service usage, and financial benefits to the health care sector. This study will also provide clear guidance on appropriate timing in the disease/care trajectory to provide a family meeting. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000200583 .

Tài liệu tham khảo

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Safety and quality of end-of-life care in acute hospitals: A background paper. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2013. p. 56. Hudson P, Payne S. Family caregivers and palliative care: Current status and agenda for the future. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(7):864–9. World Health Organisation (WHO). National cancer control programmes: Policies and managerial guidelines. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002. p. 180. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement on improving end of life care, vol. 21. Kensington: National Institutes of Health; 2004. p. 32. Palliative Care Australia. Standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians. Canberra: Palliative Care Australia; 2005. p. 44. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guidance on cancer services: Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. The manual. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004. p. 209. Ziegler L, Hill K, Neilly L, Bennett MI, Higginson IJ, Murray SA, et al. Identifying psychological distress at key stages of the cancer illness trajectory: A systematic review of validated self-report measures. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(3):619–36. Cherlin E, Fried T, Prigerson HG, Schulman-Green D, Johnson-Hurzeler R, Bradley EH. Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: When do discussions occur and what is said? J Palliat Med. 2005;8(6):1176–85. Boyle DK, Miller PA, Forbes-Thompson SA. Communication and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Patient, family, and clinician outcomes. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2005;28(4):302–16. Hannon B, O'Reilly V, Bennett K, Breen K, Lawlor P. Meeting the family: Measuring effectiveness of family meetings in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit. Palliat Support Care. 2012;10(1):7. Hudson P, Remedios C, Thomas K. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for family carers of palliative care patients. BMC Palliat Care. 2010;9(1):17. Eagar K, Owen A, Williams K, Westera A, Marosszeky N, England R, et al. In: Development CfHS, editor. Effective caring: A synthesis of the international evidence on carer needs and interventions. Brisbane: University of Wollongong; 2007. p. 114. Northouse L, Katapodi M, Song L, Zhang L, Mood D. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):317–39. Hudson P, Thomas K, Quinn K, Cockayne M, Braithwaite M. Teaching family carers about home-based palliative care: Final results from a group education program. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(2):299–308. Hudson P, Aranda S, Hayman-White K. A psycho-educational intervention for family caregivers of patients receiving palliative care: A randomised controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30(4):329–41. Hudson P, Aranda S. The ‘Melbourne family support program (FSP)’: Evidence based strategies that prepare family carers for supporting palliative care patients. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013. McMillan SC. Interventions to facilitate family caregiving at the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S132–9. National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative. Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Camperdown: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2003. p. 246. Pearson P, Proctor S, Wilcockson J, Allgar V. The process of hospital discharge for medical patients: A model. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(5):496–505. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Engelberg RA, Rubenfeld GD. The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Opportunities for improvement. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2 Suppl):N26–33. Weissman D, Quill T, Arnold R. The family meeting: Starting the conversation #223. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(2):204–5. Beach WA, Anderson JK. Communication and Cancer? Part II: Conversation Analysis. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2003;21(4):1–22. Moneymaker K. The family conference. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):157. Stapleton RD, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Goss CH, Curtis JR. Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1679–85. Lautrette A, Ciroldi M, Ksibi H, Azoulay E. End-of-life family conferences: Rooted in the evidence. Critical Care Medicine. 2006;34(11 Suppl):S364–72. Ahrens T, Yancey V, Kollef M. Improving family communications at the end of life: Implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12(4):317–23. discussion 324. Powazki R, Walsh D, Hauser K, Davis MP. Communication in palliative medicine: a clinical review of family conferences. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(10):1167–77. Hudson P, Remedios C, Zordan R, Thomas K, Clifton D, Crewdson M, et al. Guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(6):696–702. Payne S, Hudson P. Assessing the family and caregivers. In: Walsh D, Caraceni A, Fainsinger R, Foley K, Glare P, Goh C, Lloyd-Williams M, Olarte J, Radbruch L, editors. Palliative Medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 320–5. Hudson P, Quinn K, O'Hanlon B, Aranda S. Family meetings in palliative care: Multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines. BMC Palliat Care. 2008;19(7):12. Hudson P, Thomas K, Quinn K, Aranda S. Family meetings in palliative care: Are they effective? Palliat Med. 2009;23(2):150–7. Hudson P, Quinn K, O'Hanlon B, Aranda S. Family meetings in palliative care: Multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines. BMC Palliat Care. 2008;7:12. Hudson P, Thomas K, Trauer T, Remedios C, Clarke D. Psychological and social profile of family caregivers on commencement of palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(3):522–34. Goldberg D, Williams P. Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER Publishing; 1978. Jackson C. The general health questionnaire. Occup Med. 2007;57(1):79. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997;27(1):191–7. Kristjanson LJ, Atwood J, Degner LF. Validity and reliability of the family inventory of needs (FIN): Measuring the care needs of families of advanced cancer patients. J Nurs Meas. 1995;3(2):109–26. Hudson P, Hayman-White K. Measuring the psychosocial characteristics of family caregivers of palliative care patients: Psychometric properties of nine self-report instruments. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;31(3):215–28. Archbold P, Stewart B, Greenlick M, Harvath T. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of role strain. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:375–84. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83. Weitzner MA, McMillan SC. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) Scale: revalidation in a home hospice setting. J Palliat Care. 1999;15(2):13–20. Abernethy AP, Shelby-James T, Fazekas BS, Woods D, Currow DC. The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: A revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice. BMC Palliat Care. 2005;4:7. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Norris K, Asp C, Byock I. A measure of the quality of dying and death: initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2002;24(1):17–31. Downey L, Curtis JR, Lafferty WE, Herting JR, Engelberg RA. The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(1):9–22. Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Neville BA, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ. Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: Is it a quality-of-care issue? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(23):3860–6. Hudson P, Trauer T, Kelly B, O'Connor M. Improving the psychological wellbeing of family caregivers of home based palliative care patients: a randomised controlled trial. National Heath and Medical Research Council - Final report. Canberra: National Heath and Medical Research Council; 2011. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J. 2010;340:c332. Campbell M, Elbourne D, Altman D. CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J. 2004;328(7441):702–8. Lilford RJ, Pauker SG, Braunholtz DA, Chard J. Decision analysis and the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317(7155):405–9. Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(4):397–409. Wesley D. Life table analysis. J Insur Med. 1998;30(4):247–54. Briggs AH. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17(5):479–500. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage. 1998. Guyatt G, Rennie D. JAMA Users’ guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clincial practice. Chicago: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2002. National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC). Beyond the blame game: Accountability and performance benchmarks for the next Australian health care agreements. Canberra: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission; 2008. p. 53.