Bankruptcy stigma and the second chance policy: the impact of bankruptcy stigma on business restructurings in China, Europe and the United States
Tóm tắt
This paper deals with a topic of common concern to China, Europe and the United States: the negative effects of bankruptcy stigma on the second chance (fresh start) policy encouraging restructuring of businesses as an alternative to their liquidation. In most Continental European civil law systems, for example, business restructurings are still only aspirations rather than reality. This is to a great extent due to the ubiquity of intense bankruptcy stigma as a consequence of what, for example, creditors as well as the directors and officers of the bankrupt debtor avoid participating in restructuring proceedings. The resulting dominance of liquidations is perceived as a competitive disadvantage both for China and Europe compared to the United States that possesses the top model enshrined in Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. It was for these practical reasons that the second chance policy was given clear priority by the European Union as best expressed in the Commission Recommendation of 12 March 2014 on a New Approach to Business Failure and Insolvency. Similar policy shift characterizes the 2007 Enterprise Insolvency Law of the People’s Republic of China as visible from Chapter 8 on reorganisation and Chapter 9 on compositions (workouts). While bankruptcy stigma is present also in the United States, its effects are the least “biting” in this country and are an issue primarily in the context of consumer-bankruptcies. In light of the above, this article’s main claim is that without proper understanding and acknowledging the impact of bankruptcy stigma, hardly could lawmakers’ efforts aimed at forging a legal environment that would incentivize restructurings of financially distressed businesses yield success. Although some research on the topic is available, it tends to be focused on consumer bankruptcies only. A comprehensive, empirically based, inter-disciplinary scrutiny of the impact of stigma on business reorganisations is still lacking just like a “handbook” for combating the bankruptcy stigma. This article attempts to open the doors to this new inter-disciplinary area of law with the tools of comparative law. Besides canvassing the pertaining scholarship’s hereinbefore achievements, the paper extends also to such so far neglected niches of the globe as China and the post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Act No. CV of 2015 on Debt Consolidation of Natural Persons (“2015. évi CV. törvény a természetes személyek adósságrendezéséről”)
Ainlay S, Coleman L, Becker G (eds) (1986) The dilemma of difference: a multidisciplinary view of stigma. Springer, Berlin
Ayotte K, Skeel D (2010) Bankruptcy or bailouts. J Corp L 35:469–498
Baird D (2010) The elements of bankruptcy, 5th edn. Foundation Press, New York
Baird D, Rasmussen R (2005) Private debt and the missing lever of corporate governance. Vanderbilt Law Econ Res Pap 05–08: 1–49. http://www.SSRN.com
Bork R (2012) Rescuing companies in England and Germany. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bork R, van Zwieten K (eds) (2016) Commentary on the European insolvency regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carreyrou J, Karnitschnig M (2001) Paris looks to U.S.—on bankruptcy, proposed law would boost firms’ chances of survival: a reward for risk-takers? In: Wall Street Journal Europe, 25 Sept 2001 (issue)
Catan T (2008) Spain’s debtors feel the shame. In: Wall Street Journal, 13 Oct 2008 (issue)
Commission Communication of 5 October 2007 “Overcoming the stigma of business failure—for a second chance policy—Implementing the Lisbon partnership for growth and jobs,” (COM/2007/0584 final)
Commission Recommendation of 12 March 2014 on a new approach to business failure and insolvency (2014/135/EU)
Efrat R (2006) The evolution of bankruptcy stigma. Theor Inq Law 7:365–394
Eidenmüller H (2014) Die Restrukturierungsempfehlung der EU-Kommission und das deutsche Restrukturierungsrecht [The Restructuring Recommendation of the EU Commission and German Insolvency Law] downloadable (in German language) http://www.SSRN.com
Ferguson N (2009) The ascent of money. Penguin Books, New York
Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung der Sanierung von Unternehmen (Act for the further Simplification of Company Restructuring—ESUG)
Goffman E (1990) STIGMA—notes on the management of spoiled identity, Penguin
Gubitz D, Nikoleyczik T, Schult L (2012) Manager liability in Germany. C.H. Beck, München
Havel B (2011) The bankruptcy stigma is gone for airlines, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/12/07/waging-war-on-wages/the-bankruptcy-stigma-is-gone-for-airlines. Accessed 27 June 2017
Hoff MJ, Larose AL, Scatturo FJ (2006) Public companies. Law Journal Press, New York
Howell N, Mason R (2015) Reinforcing stigma or delivering a fresh start: bankruptcy and future engagement in the workforce. UNSWLJ 38(4):1529–1574
Hungary: 1991. évi XLIX. Törvény a csődeljárásról és a felszámolási eljárásról (1991 Act No XLIX on Reorganization and Liquidation Proceedings)
ICSID case Dan Cake v. Hungary No. ARB/12/9
Juhász L (2014) A Magyar fizetésképtelenségi jog kézikönyve (Hungarian insolvency handbook), Novotni Alapítvány kiadó (Novotni Foundation Publications), Miskolc (Hungary)
Krause CS (2011) A practitioner’s guide to prepackaged bankruptcy, American Bankruptcy Institute
LoPucki LM (2017) Californian UCLA-LoPucki bankruptcy research database project, http://lopucki.law.ucla.edu/index.htm. Accessed 27 June 2017
Mallon C, Waisman S (2011) The law and practice of restructuring in the UK and US. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mamić V, Kokot N, Zarković B, Popović N (2015) Croatian Pre-Insolvency Settlement Saves Companies which are ‘too big to fail. In: Olivares-Caminal R (ed) Expedited corporate debt restructuring in the EU. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Maroto M (2012) The scarring effects of bankruptcy: cumulative disadvantage across credit and labor markets. Soc Forces 91(1):99–130
Martin N (2003) Common-law bankruptcy systems: similarities and differences. Am Bankruptcy Inst Law Rev 11(367):368
McCormack G (2009) Apples and oranges? Corporate rescue and functional convergence in the US and UK. Int Insolv Rev 18:109–134
McCormack G, Keay A, Brown S (2017) European insolvency law. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Mols Y (2012) Bankruptcy stigma and vulnerability: questioning autonomy and structuring resilience. Emory Bankruptcy Dev J 29:289–331
Philippe & Partners, Deloitte & Touche (2002) Bankruptcy and a fresh start: stigma on failure and legal consequences of bankruptcy: a study
Piñeiro LC (2014) Towards the reform of the European insolvency regulation: codification rather than modification. Ned Int Priv (NIPR) 2:207–215
Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast)
Ruan V (2013) Stigma holds back bankruptcy law, In: South China Morning Post, 12 Aug 2013 (issue). http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1295985/why-stigma-holds-back-chinas-bankruptcy-law. Accessed 27 June 2017
Shuguang L, Zuofa W (2010) China’s bankruptcy law after three years: the gaps between legislation expectancy and practice and the future Road. Int’l Corp Rescue 7(1):303–312
Skeel D Jr (2001) Debt’s dominion: a history of bankruptcy law in America. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sousa M (2013) Bankruptcy stigma: a socio-legal study. Am Bankruptcy Law J 877:435–482
Spiller P, Tokeley K (2010) Individual consumer redress. In: Howells G, Ramsay I, Wilhelmsson T, Kraft D (eds) Handbook of research on international consumer law. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Sullivan T, Warren E, Westbrook JL (2006) Less stigma or more financial distress: an empirical analysis of the extraordinary increase in bankruptcy filings. Stanf Law Rev 59:213–256
Supreme people’s court releases 2016 bankruptcy data (26 Feb 2017). https://supremepeoplescourtmonitor.com/2017/02/26/supreme-peoples-court-releases-2016-bankruptcy-data/. Accessed 27 June 2017
Tabb HC, Brubaker R (2003) Bankruptcy law: principles, policies and practice. Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati
Tajti T (2002) Comparative secured transactions law. Akadémiai könyvkiadó, Budapest
Tajti T (2015) A csődstigma, a második esély mentalitás és a csődjog viszonyáról - amit az összehasonlító jog sugall, MTA Law Working Papers 2015/6, The Institute for Legal Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. http://jog.tk.mta.hu/uploads/files/mtalwp/2015_06_Tajti.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017
Tajti T (2017) Security rights and insolvency law in the Central and Eastern European systems. In: McCormack G, Bork R (eds) Security rights and the European insolvency regulation, Intersentia, Cambridge-Antwerp-Portland
Ustawa z dnia 9 kwietnia 2015 r.—Prawo Restrukturyzacyjne (Polish Restructuring Act 2015)
Weisberg R (1986) Commercial morality, the merchant characters, and the history of the voidable preferences. Stanf Law Rev 39:3–138
Wickouski S (2007) Bankruptcy crimes. Beard Books, Frederick
World Bank (1966) Convention on the settlement of investment disputes between states and nationals of other states
World Bank (2013) Insolvency and creditor/debtor regimes task force, Report on the treatment of the insolvency of natural persons. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGILD/Resources/WBInsolvencyOfNaturalPersonsReport_01_11_13.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017
Yang Y (2017) Beijing penalises 6.7 m debtors with travel ban, financial times, 16 Feb 2017 (issue)
Zakon o financijskom poslovanju i predstečajnoj nagodbi (2012) (The financial operations and pre-insolvency settlement act of 2012), Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia, NN 108/12
Ziegel J (1990) The new personal property security regimes—have we gone too far? Alberta Law Rev 28(4):739–760